Slashback: Mods, Books, Checkmate 335
Quick, Danny, write faster! Danny Yee has written additional reviews of Jessica Litman's Digital Copyright , Naomi Klein's No Logo , and John Sundman's Acts of the Apostles . (You might want to flashback to earlier reviews of these by Michael Sims and Jon Katz, Warren A. Layton, and Hemos.)
From the Persian for "King" Frederic Friedel of Chessbase contributed some links which are especially interesting in light of the recently announced match between Deep Fritz and Vladimir Kramnik. He points to this link and this other link, saying "The latter has some nice quotes from Kramnik."
In addition, Frederic has links with more on Kasparov vs. Deep Blue, and Fritz in Space.
But the name is already perfect for a MAD parody ... RFINN writes: "If you haven't heard by now, Lucasfilm announced the name of Episode II. It's going to be called 'Attack of the Clones.' If you're like me, this stirs up pictures of Jedi running from giant red tomatoes and such. Do your civic duty and help change the name that has become the laughing stock of the sci-fi movie going community (and some of the actors themselves) by signing a petition to be sent to George Lucas."
Sold! to the man with the large contingent of lawyers!
ncmusic writes "For all of you readers that have been following Bid For Power the DragonballZ Q3 mod. Funimation has issued a cease and desist order to the group. Funimation has excluse rights to DBZ in the US (and EU I think) and has sold exclusive video game rights to Infograms. Below is the announcement made on the site about the order. My question to the slashdot community is do you think this is fair? BFP is a FREE mod to an already existing game. Have their been any other precedence set for making mods based on characters from copyrighted work? And what advice do you have for the Bid For Power group?
'As many of you know Funimation owns the copyrights to Dragonball Z in the USA and has sold the exclusive rights to publish video games to Infogrames. On December 1st, 2000, the Bid For Power team received a cease and desist order from Funimation.
However, they seemed receptive to the notion of allowing Bid For Power to be released so long as certain conditions were met. We were put in touch with Infogrames who asked us, among other things, to recreate Bid For Power on Wild Tangent, a java-based engine, which would then be posted on the Dragonball Z website for people to play. This engine is incapable of running something as detailed as Bid For Power and we would have had to start work from scratch. Most of the team rejected the idea and talks went downhill from there. Without contact with Infogrames or Funimation the progress of Bid For Power slowed down even though we were sitting on a finished product and had been for some time.
We began dealing with Funimation directly in April when they asked us to send videos of gameplay to them so that they could have TOEI Japan review it. We sent the videos and heard nothing until we emailed them in July asking that we be allowed to release in August, since no objections had be made from TOEI Japan that we knew of. We were then sent another Cease and Desist order by way of Funimation.'"
So the confirmed-as-rumor rumor has become real? This is the sort of thing that would be best kept in the realm of rumor.
The ST:TNG Mod for Doom 2 (Score:1)
Re:The ST:TNG Mod for Doom 2 (Score:2)
"He wanted to go to the Holodeck!"
Video Game Copy Rights (Score:4, Funny)
However, if the game qualifies as a parody then most of the copyrights are extremely difficult to maintain. Having had some exposure to DBZ, i'm sure that it won't be that hard to get from serious DBZ to a Parody of DBZ.
Flashback... (Score:1)
Christ, get a life (Score:5, Insightful)
I swear, Lucas can do nothing right anymore.
Re:Christ, get a life (Score:2, Insightful)
Star Wars has always been sci-fi space opera fluff--GREAT sci-fi space opera fluff. It's the stuff of cheap, easy teenage male fantasy, with slimy green aliens keeping our women in bondage fetish wear, big explosions, simple farmboys secretly being born to be galactic heros, etc.
"Attack of the Clones" is a perfect title in this tradition.
Re:Christ, get a life (Score:3, Funny)
(You are L. Ron Hubbard, posting from Mars orbit, and still bitter about Heinlein being a better writer than you. Lord Xenu demands that you take back what you said. "Friday" was not space-opera fluff, and the aliens in it were neither slimy nor green!
Re:Christ, get a life (Score:2)
I swear, Lucas can do nothing right anymore.
Funny, I was just thinking how Lucas can do no wrong. He is absolutely masterful at keeping the Star Wars hype going with pre-release rumors. In other words, he gets to keep selling action figures by the ton, with little promotional expense. Hell, he doesn't even have to make a good movie any more and it grosses $430 million [imdb.com], nevermind the action figures.
Come on, why do you think he re-re-released the original trilogy? Just to make the public happy? Do you think it was coincidental that shortly after he re-re-re-released the same triology but now in a gold case with new scenes and animated critters? Why do you really think the DVD isn't coming out yet?
He knows he's got a pile of suckers and is milking us for all we're worth. Personally, as long as he keeps entertaining me (via the movies, the pre-movie hype, or the action figures, I don't care), I'm more than happy to keep playing the sucker.
Thank you. (Score:2)
Even "Star Wars" is a hokey name. That's the point, isn't it?
Re:Christ, get a life (Score:2)
Ok, and here comes your own clever revelation:
"Attack of the Clones" sucks, bottom line, end of story.
Wow, touche. Now I see the light.
Re:Christ, get a life (Score:3, Interesting)
The Phantom Menace
The Clone Wars
The Fall of the Jedi
A New Hope
The Empire Strikes Back
The Return of the Jedi
That would truly be awesome.
Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary (Score:2)
Some of us hackers/geeks do it differently for a reason [tuxedo.org]. Not sure if that applies here, though.
Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary (Score:2)
WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.wildtangent.com/developer/downloads/ove rviews/WebDriverOverview/index.html
Bypasses all the marketing fluff and explains what the product actually is.
Re:WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. (Score:2)
Just?
Tomatoes, please, not Tomato's (Score:2)
It's already extremely unlikely Lucas will pay any attention, but we might as well be grammatically correct in our attempt, so as not to be discarded before he even sees the petition.
Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:5, Insightful)
I refer them to this handy guide: Bob The Angry Flower's Quick Guide to the Apostrophe, You Idiots [angryflower.com]
Hopefully that'll clear things right up.
---
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:2)
That being said, I'm opting not to use it because it looks freaky weird to write VCR's.
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:2)
Who was the idiot that thought *that* was a good idea?
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:1)
The apostrophe as an indicator of possession is an accident of orthography, not grammar or syntax. The apostrophe traditionally represents sounds that are left out, usually vowels. The genitive (or possessive) case in the singular was generally formed in English by adding -es to a noun. The plural was generally -a. With a few exceptions, the e was gradually lost in pronunciation, and spelling conventions followed suit, putting an apostrophe in place of the e in every genitive - except for pronouns. I'm not sure if the use of an apostrophe without the "s" for the plural genitive arose at the same time. So from a historical perspective, the apostrophe in Tom's and the apostrophe in isn't are actually doing the same thing, not different things.
Gradually, however, the concept of -es as the genitive marker was lost, and the "rule" of 's and ' (for plural) being the possessive markers was extrapolated from common orthographic usage. Most of the other case formations were regularised, and the genitive (marked now by the apostrophe) is really the only vestige remaining of the old case system, with the exception, again, of the pronouns.
Pronouns were and still are irregular. "Its" as the accepted form of the third-person neuter genitive pronoun was well-established before "Tomes" would have been shortened to "Tom's". (As an aside, the dominant Anglo-Saxon form was "his", from the nominative "hit", consonant with masculine "he" and feminine "heo". The "h" was dropped in the dominant dialect, though some dialect populations in England and America still retain the old "h" pronunciation, however.)
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:5, Funny)
Sorry- I meant billion's.
It does depress me that to avoid lowering the self esteem of million's of illiterate's, we need to condone their mistake's. These are prople that can't even find their (there?) country on a map two out of three time's. I'm all for language evolving, but I refuse to follow the lead of the hillbilly's. I suppose that after a few more generation's of homeschooling these folk's will be writing Webster's for us. I think I'll just move to Canada and speak French. They might have stupid idea's about language, but they're better than your's.
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:2, Funny)
Out of curiosity, do you consider a VCR to be a letter, a number, or a figure?
:) (Please accept this in the humorous spirit it was intended, as if we were old friends or something instead of complete strangers on the Internet.)
Re:Grammar Nazi, again. (Score:1)
And by the way you'd pluralise it VCR's, as with all acronyms I can think of. Probably.
Bloody Petition (Score:3, Funny)
My first response when seeing the petition to change the god awful name of Episode II was happiness at being able to voice my mind and support an effort to improve a series I care about.
On consideration however, I think that signing that thing ignores the real problem -- quality of content. It is my expectation that Ep II will suffer a weak storyline, lame characters, jackass explanations (i.e., the Force comes from bugs in your cells or whatever the hell that was) just as Ep I did. Given this near certainty, I think the title is great. Let shit be called shit and we can save ourselves some grief.
Re:Bloody Petition (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bloody Petition (Score:2)
There are other qualitative and quantitative differences between the first movies and ep 1, but I've spent enough time discussing what went from a series that was targeted at 14-20 year olds to a series that's targeted for 6-12 year olds.
Re:Bloody Petition (Score:2)
I did. Phantom Menace just wasn't as good. At least not if judged as a movie intended for adults.
Re:Bloody Petition (Score:2)
I don't like to admit it, but I grew up. And I still like Empire Strikes Back. So just because something is aimed at kids, that doesn't mean it has to suck. A good storyteller can go after the kids and still be attractive to other groups as well. But somewhere along the way, Lucas forgot how to do this, or decided that it wasn't important.
There are better things to petition (Score:5, Interesting)
What might be better? Well, for one:
Anti-DMCA Petition:
http://www.dibona.com/dmca/
Programmers speak in Code.
http://www.anti-dmca.org
You really need to start acting or there won't be any net...
Re:There are better things to petition (Score:1)
Do something useful with your time instead of bitching about someone else's story. Write your own or read one who's title you can live with.
Harbinger
Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:5, Insightful)
Stupid people get no sympathy here.
(Karma, goodbye...)
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:4, Insightful)
I think there is a case to be made that this mod would fall under the category of parody. This means that it is protected from claims of copyright infringement under the first ammendment.
Besides, if you want to take such an exclusive view...where do you draw the line? Can I use a DBZ skin for my player? Can I use a DBZ character name for my player?
IMHO, if there is no profit involved then the courts, society, and all of us should be giving people wide latitude when it comes to these kinds of creative endevours.
- JoeShmoe
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:3, Interesting)
So if I take something of yours and give it away, but I don't charge for it, that's ok, right? Because there's no profit involved, right?
Something tells me this viewpoint is just a little bit simplistic.
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:2, Insightful)
The whole purpose of the copyright laws were to encourage creativity. Things that extend or add to creative works (as long as their are clearly labeled to identify origin) should be allowed.
- JoeShmoe
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:2)
Don't think "theft" of the digital property. Think "theft" of the rights to distribute that property. Once someone else has given the property away you no longer have the exclusive right to distribute do you? Unauthorized copies are moving around. That's how it's "theft."
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:2)
NO NO NO (Score:2)
Jebus people! If you create something for your own personal use it DOES NOT constitute copyright infringement. Nor would it constitute patent infringement. Those 2 areas of law are designed to prevent COMPETITION. If you are not distributing the creation, it is not competition.
Re:NO NO NO (Score:2)
You won't find time-shifting or space-shifting in USC17 either, but we do have those rights. Thanks to the courts anyway.
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:3, Informative)
You draw that line in the sand and I'll find some way to split it in half. Copyright laws were designed to focus on intent, not specifics.
- JoeShmoe
Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers (Score:2)
The Courts have taken this to mean (especialy under the 14th ammendment) that the Congress can make pretty much whatever law it wants provided that it doesn't abridge any specific or implied freedom as determined by the court. Furthermore, I find it highly unlikely that this Court is going to strike down Copyright as unconstitutional.
Re:Non-profit < > harmless (Score:2)
If there's any old-school Doom fans here who haven't played it yet, it's worth your time. >:)
Star Wars? Think about the nane!! (Score:2)
People keep getting upset about the Star Wars films having Lucas fingerprints all over them, and for the life of me, I can't understand why! Star Wars is Star Wars, and it should not suprise you that there are things as painful as Ewoks, as predictable as light-sword fights, as broken science as ships meant for vacuum with hinged hatches. These are the hallmarks of the fun-but-essentially-fluff science-fiction-fantasy that Lucas creates. It's decent fantasy, but with high (and almost certainly accidental) camp value.
Go see the movie expecting a Lucas film, and I guarantee you will not be disappointed. Go expecting the next 2001, and you will be an unhappy camper.
Let's stop this ludicrous Lucas-bashing.... (Score:4, Informative)
The Phantom Menace refers to the underlying theme of the SW films: evil lies within. It showed its characters embracing violence (Amidala), deceit (Qui-Gon) and anger (Obi-Wan) in order to do what they considered to be the right thing. Intelligent film-watchers who have seen ROTJ should be aware of this. It is only when Luke renounces violence at the end of ROTJ that the tables turn and the "good" side wins. Coincidence???
Consider the end of TPM. All three contingents are effectively "disarmed" (sometimes forcibly) before they achieve victory. And the moment they give up their weaponry -- they win.
But what does this all have to do with clones? Thematically, TPM is full of "doubled images" (handmaidens, Sidious/Palpatine, droids) which are associated with order falling apart. Even the planet Naboo is split into two halves (the ego and the id - diplomats and warriors), etc. And so if you actually bother to reflect on it, the new title makes perfect sense. These bad decisions our "protagonists" will make (out of - no doubt - a desire to do good) will begin to backfire on them badly.
As much as people may dislike Jar Jar (I found his presence objectionable myself), doing idiotic things like signing this petition is just foolish.
Re:Let's stop this ludicrous Lucas-bashing.... (Score:2)
But aside from Qui-Gon becoming a double-ended shish-kebab (and forgetting to become one with The Force), Obi-Wan was only briefly disarmed, before picking up Qui-Gon's sabre and finishing the job. And I recall Amidala fighting her way into the throne-room where she could point a gun at the Trade Federation guys. Neither really gave up their weapons. And the whole battle was eventually resolved when Anakin fluked the destruction of the control ship (man, they had light-speed travel, but didn't know about redundancy) using a Naboo ship he'd borrowed.
I suspect that you're reading just a little bit too much intentional sub-plot into the movie.
Re:Reading into the film.... ;) (Score:2)
Oh, just to clarify, I'm geniunely not being sarcastic here (I would have used more italics and the SARCASM tag).
Wow.....
Revenge of the Jedi (Score:2, Informative)
I expect this to be no differant.
FEAR (Score:2)
Funimation (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:Funimation (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Funimation (Score:2)
But they have the right to protect their trademarks - it is the Law - Dont like it - go to university and get a law degree, or run for government and change it - dont sit there and whinge. Legally they have a perfect right to control the actions of a non profit mod - the own the character rights and thus they can legally say how and where the names, images and concepts can be used - end of story.
The MS comment is childish - you are talking about 2 different licenses and 2 different laws - MS license you to make USE of their product thus you can write letters on it etc etc.
Fair us unfortunately has NOTHING to do with copyrighted images etc, the company could choose to not block or to block it - they have chosen the latter - and Funimation have total right to stop them as they own the characters (legally)
Check out the MS license and then do a search on copyright laws.
These guys have wasted their time and they lose out -they should have gotten a clearance in writing before starting - thats what BUSINESS people do - and even if its not for profit the company can argue the very reason they chose the Dragonball Z characters was to get the considerable fan base intersetd that is they used the funimation copryrighted material to attract customers to their product - whether they make money of not is a moot point really.
Re:Funimation (Score:2)
Profit isn't the deciding factor. If Microsoft decides to clone StreetFighter and give it away for free in an effort to kill Capcom -- like they killed Netscape by giving IE away for free -- is that okay? They're not making a profit on it!
The issue of damage to the copyright holder has to be part of the discussion.
Liberalism is socialism. Conservatism is fascism. Vote Libertarian.
Amen, brother. I can agree with that one.
Continuing this OT thread... (Score:2)
Let's pick some examples and give a Bizzaro World rating on each isue:
Abortion: This is one of the weirdest issues to be shoe-horned into the conservative versus liberal scale. Abortion is entirly a religious issue. A powerful subset of religions in this country has decided that this is their litmus test. The supposedly constitutional conservative polititions should be pointing to the "separation of church and state" clause of the Constitution and telling these groups to fuck off. The supposedly careing liberal politions should be fighting for money to build huge government "embryo orphanages" to bring up and help the helpless little zygotes. Bizzaro world rating: 9.7
Welfare (see military): Tax credits to corporations, payments to farmers, discount grazing rates on public lands, mineral rights to public lands sold for a fraction of the private-sector value; all are defended by the supposedly conservative right wing and opposed by the supposedly liberal left. Bizzaro world rating: 9.4
Military (see welfare): The biggest government-funded job program in history is the darling of the conservatives. On the other hand, the biggest government-funded job program in history (that also provides education and training for some of the poorest citizens) is the target of the librerals. Bizzaro world rating: 9.1
Drug War: Similar to the arguments on abortion. The liberals are saying, "Stay out of my life, let me do what I want." The conservatives are pushing for military raids on individiual's homes, "taking" of private property, and system that amounts to little more than a government job's program for lawyers and prison guards. Since the drug war does proportionatly affect minorities and the poor these issue does play into the stereotypes of convervatives versus liberals which limits the bizzaro world rating: 5
Environment: You would think that an Adam Smith solution to this issue would make everyone happy. Make corporations pay the full cost required to clean up after themselves. Charge full market value for logging, grazing, and mineral rights on government land. To do anything less is welfare. The conservatives sure don't seem to pushing very hard on this. On the other hand, liberals seem to have a knee jerk reaction against anything that "commodifies" nature and they also have a tendanency to want to spend infinite amounts of money on perfect solutions instead of available money on those solutions that will do the most good. See the flap over the "arsenic in the drinking water" as a good example of politics over results. Bizzaro world rating: 8.7
My last point: next time someone tries and describe someone as "conservative" or "liberal" when they really mean "right" or "left"... slap them.
Re:Continuing this OT thread... (Score:2)
Re:Funimation (Score:3, Informative)
copyright (Score:2)
Re:Funimation (Score:2)
"Do not taunt happy Funimation ball Z."
Giant Red Tomatoes (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Giant Red Tomatoes (Score:2)
I know I felt like pelting the ugly motherfucker with tomatoes when I saw Episode I. (Jar Jar, not Lucas. But the title of Episode II is making me question the wisdom of that choice.)
I guess Lucas figured that if we wouldn't let him ruin Episode II with Still More Jar Jar Binks, he'd self-destruct the whole franchise by turning it into a series of 50's B-movies.
On the other hand, at the current rate of decline in the Star Wars franchise, there's hope that Episode III will be entitled "Planet of Hot Grits" and feature plenty of gratuitous wet-toga-and-jewelry shots Natalie Portman getting her hair done. Wooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooo!
Lucas Arts and naming the movie (Score:4, Insightful)
Dont you think its a bit childish to have petitions to change the name of a movie that a company has decided on ? What about world hunger? civil rights ? rape? Nope were gonna protest about a movie
I give it approx 10 minutes befors some ethical person posts email addresses for lucas arts staff or george lucas himself - that wayy all of you can mailbomb them to death in the reponsible adult way you all practice
Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie (Score:2)
Man, that means you must be extra childish since instead of spending your time helping out the homeless, downtrodden, or battered, you're here ranting about people ranting about a movie.
Sorry sir, stop looking down your nose as people; not everyone has to devote their lives to the 'important' causes. Life would be pretty damn boring if nobody took the time to deal with some of the 'frills'.
Oh, the humanity! (Score:2)
News flash... things that "aren't allowed" still happen. Plenty. Bringing attention to illegal atrocities may serve to reduce their occurance even more.
Unfortunately, very little is likely to reduce the occurance of Star Wars movies. Sigh.
Y'know... (Score:2, Offtopic)
If you're going to put up a link to a petition which is closed *before a single comment has been posted*, then wouldn't it make sense to alter the article and note in it "oh, btw, you can't sign the petition anymore" ?
What's up with this wierd aversion to updating the article to reflect important details that are A) in h2 type at the top of the link B) noted in cid #12 or so..? I mean, it isn't a big problem.. i'm just curious.
regarding the funimation thing (Score:2)
Whatever happened with history.. (Score:3, Insightful)
If they are making the movie after the Clone Wars, the title is perfect..perhaps it is 50-60ish, but so what, it's better then watching the Trade Federation and the annoying droids do all the fighting
Then again, i'm use to reading the Star Wars books, which are as we all know, books are always twice as good as movies
Attack of the Clones (Score:5, Funny)
Too Close. (Score:2)
heh... (Score:2)
I was kinda thinking along those lines myself. If I was Lucas, I KNOW I wouldn't be able to resist the chance to fuck with the heads of a bunch of Star Wars geeks :) For all we know he could be laughing his ass off right now.
Re:hehe (Score:2)
Attack of the fans (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Attack of the fans (Score:2)
Oh, please, Jesus. Make him stop before releasing this one.
What BFP should do: (Score:3, Interesting)
1) Change the game to a Dragonball Z like mod. All they would have to do is change the faces of the characters. Just so they are not immediately recognizable. They would also have to change a few maps (like Kami's house).
2) Ask for donations. Check out the forums over there (links at the top of their page) and if everyone only sent $5 dollars they'd probably have enough for legal defense. Some lawyers might take it pro bono for publicity.
3) Get whichever company makes Quake (don't own it so I don't know) to help them. This is a mod for an existing game, so Funimations licensing may not cover it.
4) "Sneak" a copy or several hundred thousand out to the general public. Once it's out (and I've heard copies are already floating around) what is Funimation going to do? I envision an ICQ/ email/ etc distribution campaign. This is what I would do.
Re:What BFP should do: (Score:2)
If Attack of the Clones wasn't bad enough (Score:4, Funny)
Dude's got to lay off the crack.
Petition The BFP Crew (Score:2)
Lookey what I found! (Score:3, Informative)
two links!
Lucas Film name (Score:3, Insightful)
He did it with Jedi
Imagine the t-shirt presses of Shenzen are whirrin up right now with "Attack of the Clones".
Be a bit of a blow to them if he changed the name a month before it opened.
Re:Lucas Film name (Score:2)
When questioned why, he said that "Revenge is not a Jedi Concept".
IIRC, this little factoid was revealed on the "The Making Of...." preview at the start of the Special Edition video tape (3-tape widescreen collection, U.K. version, though it's probably present on all the SE Ep III tapes).
However, I'm posting from work, so I'm unable to verify this source right now. It could all be a figment of my diseased imagination. Or it could be marketing spin to make Lucas sound more like Buddha and less like a merchandising-cash-hungry dog.
Re:Lucas Film name (Score:2)
Not so silly. (Score:2)
Re:Not so silly. (Score:1)
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe their main concern is getting it done in real time. Like weather forecasting or 3-D graphics, the techniques for solving the problem have been identified many years ago - the only problem is seeing how much processing power (and algorithm optimisation) you can put in to reach a certain level of "good".
Grab.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:3, Interesting)
What Dnet would be good for is move searches and end game tables, tables that specifiy a board position and the final outcome of that game
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:2, Interesting)
ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Proj
Building something that actually plays chess
over such a network is not going to work. Latency
is critical for all current parallel chess algorithms.
--
GCP
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:4, Interesting)
There are an astronomical number of possible board configurations in chess, but they are finite. A distributed system could play every possible chess game, attempting every possible move and every possible countermove, and find out what lines result in white win, black win, or draw. By building that sort of database, a computer would be able to play by rote memory to the best possible outcome.
Once that was done, chess would be as "boring" to computers as tic-tac-toe is to adults, and for the same reasons.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:1)
But of course we could take the other route: generate all possible positions and calculate all winning lines, as Ken Thompson did in the 80ies for three, four and five-piece endings. When you complete the retrograde analysis on these the computer plays them perfectly. We even use these endgames in the Fritz search, so that these days typically Fritz ends its won games by announcing mate in 20 to 70 moves. The first batch of six-piece endings have now been generated, but they are big. And the interesting ones (not yet calculated) are with pawns, which makes them even bigger. Pawns ruin one plane of symmetry and have the irritating habit of being promotable, so that you have to have all the piece endings that can derive from them available as well. Fritz can access a number of pawnless six-piece endings, but there is currently no practical use for installing these endgames.
How about the 32-piece endgame? Now this is seriously big, containing between 10^40 and 10^50 positions. Trust me, it cannot be handled by the computer farms you propose. Dr John Nunn (mathematician, chess Grandmaster) tells me that just storing the 32-piece endgame database using optimum storage techniques (smallest theoretical energy levels for each bit of information) would require the matter stored in a few million galaxies. Maybe it could be done, but John is worried what Greenpeace would say about a project that involves dismantling galaxies in order to store chess.
They'd probably chain themselves to the rocket ships.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe technically finite, but astronomical doesn't give justice to the number. My quick estimate is that even if you could somehow store one game per atom, the entire earth doesn't have enough atoms to save all of the permutations.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:1)
Of course, since I read it here in Slashdot, there's a 72,1489% chance of being wrong. People here always come up with numbers to prove their point.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:1)
- Steeltoe
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:1)
The estimated number of chess games is 10^80. The estimated number of all particles in the universe (a lot more of them than atoms) is 10^100.
Also, if you have 10 billion computers, each computing 10 billion positions a second, it would take you only 10^60 seconds to enumerate them all. According to the physicists the universe has been in existence for about 10^18 secs.
Of course you probably would not to have to enumerate all positions to solve chess, but the numbers are telling.
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:2)
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Distributed Chess (Score:1)
Re:Petition.. (Score:1)
Re:Petition.. (Score:3, Funny)
Shakes the Clone
Planet of the Clones
Home A-Clone
Clone with the Wind
Jurassic Clone
The Lion Clone
Beverly Hills Clone
The Clonefather
Honey, I Shrunk the Clones
Dances with Clones
101 Clones
Snow White and the Seven Clones
The Rocky Horror Picture Clone
An Officer and a Clone
The Nutty Clone
The Hunt for Clone October
The Clonefather II
Remember the Clones
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Clone
Interview with the Clone
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Clone
Star Wars VI: Return of the Clone
How the Clone Stole Christmas
Raiders of the Lost Clone
Saving Private Clone
The Perfect Clone
Re:Petition.. (Score:2)
"Crouching Jedi, Hidden Clone"
Can't take credit for that one, though... :)
Re:Petition.. (Score:2, Funny)
Jar-jar gets cloned
-= rei =-
Re:Attack of the Clones! (Score:2)
Anyway, if Jar-Jar and Jake had been involved the title would have been more like "Itsa De Cloneys Attacking. Yippeee!".
Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 54 (Score:2)
You mean other than being the same people with multiple accounts?