Iridium Offers Data service - IRC From Anywhere! 119
quadra writes: "Iridium is now offering satellite data services. For the first time, dial-up and direct internet applications are available anywhere on the planet. Using a data kit attached to an Iridium phone you can either dial up a modem, or use direct internet connectivity. Speeds are rather modest (9600bps) but there's plenty of applications where that'd suffice." OK. I would happily pay $300 / month even for 9.6kbps, if it was unmetered -- I could ride my BikeE the world around with a headmounted display, a twiddler, and a solar-charged laptop in the cargo bin. But prices are hard to find on the Iridium website, which means I can't afford it.
Dwarves (Score:1)
Only 'UPTO' 10 Kb/s (Score:1)
It says that the it is 'upto' 10Kb/s dependant upon the content.
I.E. if it's highly compressible text, it may be 10 Kb/s otherwise it's less..
Re:Pricing? (Score:4)
Activation: $50
Monthly just-because fee: $19.99 to $289 (0 - 250 minutes included)
Per-minute
Per "data transmission" $1.09
anyway, one provider isn't afraid to quote prices online. You sort it out:
http://www.rentexpress.com/iridium/iridium_us_in.h tml [rentexpress.com]
wait... (Score:1)
What the hell happened that they can offer low (very low!) speed internet access now?
--
Forget Napster. Why not really break the law?
Re:1s ping: They should be able to do better than (Score:2)
Those Geo solutions you are looking at require MUCH more transmit power and MUCH larger antennas. 40Mbps is going to require a directional antenna if you want to use it for uplink. Downlink is much easier, but you better belive you are going to pay through the nose for that bandwidth (unless it is part of some broadcast service like DirectTV that you don't actually have control over).
One more thing, Iridium is global, many other geo satellite services only offer coverage in North America and Europe. Omnitracs for instance has no coverage in Africa (Omnitracs was designed to track vehicle movement, FexEx uses it to keep track of it's trucks, and I think they may use it to send updates to the order tracking system since I've receved FedEx packages before and checked the website 3 minutes later to discover my package was already marked delivered).
By the way, there are very few cybercafes in the middle of the ocean, or in the Sahara, or even in the more desolate parts of Africa (Read: anything that is not a major city or anybody who is still fighting a blood feud with their neighbor after 100 years).
Hmm I'm not very good at reading Italian, just how much uplink bandwidth do you get with this free service? Who paid to put the satellite up there? It looks like one of those DSS style systems, which makes me think you might have to buy Satellite TV (not a bad deal actually) to use this thing. Of course it's another example of broadcast technologies that can be cheaper because of economies of scale, and most likely because they offer up the bandwidth the aren't using (yet) for free, so the more channels they add the crappier your service gets.
Down that path lies madness. On the other hand, the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.
Re:So is my stock still good? (Score:2)
Down that path lies madness. On the other hand, the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.
I hope it's better now. (Score:4)
There is some good news though. The service is a lot better if you get out of the city (driving down 81 I was able to keep the connection running for nearly 20 minutes once) and it does work EVERYWHERE. Finally, you do get better data rates with this than many (most) other commerically avilable satellite services (ComTech (~24 bytes a second, several second latency), OmniTracs (~7-8 bytes a second, several minute latency), and others).
Next time you need to check your email in the middle of Africa, you will thank your lucky stars that Iridium exists though, since your choices are the cheap-by-satellite-comms standards Iridium, or a much heavier much bulkier much much more expensive satellite solution.
Down that path lies madness. On the other hand, the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.
Re:NOT "anywhere on the planet" (Score:1)
Re:Pricing? (Score:3)
sPh
Holographic Display? (Score:1)
(It's the 10th bullet of the "Features" column on the right at http://www.iridium.com/product/iri_product-detail
Re:Nice, but hardly new (Score:1)
Based on what I see on their web site, I think that just pointing the aerial straight up is sufficient. Perhaps this is is only true in marketing land.
Anyway, does Iridium not support call hand-off?
Data rate is only 2400 bps (Score:3)
Read the Iridium service details carefully. The 'data service' (data calls to anywhere, presumably converted to standard modem protocols at the PSTN gateway) 'offers a data rate of up to 2.4 Kbps', which is the figure I recall from previously reading about Iridium.
The 'Internet data service' (which appears to mean using Iridium as your ISP) 'utilizes transparent compression, resulting in a data rate of up to 10 Kbps, depending on content' (my emphasis). So no, Iridium didn't suddenly get faster or start supporting channel bonding. I suspect that the standard data service probably includes such compression too, but the marketing department just forgot to include this misleading statement in its description. This does not turn a 2400 bps connection through Iridium into a 10 kbps connection any more than MNP5 (included in any ordinary modem) turns your 50 kbps connection through the PSTN into a 200 kbps connection.
Re:I hope it's better now. (Score:1)
/Andrew
Re:some would say (Score:1)
Re:Access from anywhere (Score:1)
a friend of mine went mountain climbing, and he had access to a wireless solution that was $11/minute. he used it, but i bet he was sweating bullets the whole time.
Wow. (Score:2)
<montypython>You're a loony.</montypython>
Silliness aside, cyclers have a hard enough time obeying basic traffic guidelines
(riding on the right side of the road, signaling, etc) WITHOUT computers or cell phones.
I'd hate to have to watch out for even more traffic stupidity from this crowd.
C-X C-S
Re:Wow. (Score:2)
You'd have to define "cyclist" - the serious ones know the vehicle code, and well. It's the helmetless redneck riding facing INTO traffic running red lights you need to worry about.
Actually, most of the ones I see violating traffic laws aren't the dirty hippie types,
but the arrogant yuppie "wannabe pro" types.
They're like the riceboys [riceboypage.com] of the cycling world - flashy spandex, expensive bikes, logos slapped all over themselves/their equipment...and absolutely no idea that bikes have to follow the same traffic laws as motorized vehicles do.
C-X C-S
Re:Wow. (Score:2)
Outside of Denver, CO. You prolly heard a lot about my home town a couple years ago.
the racer types tend to be sticklers for doing it right. However, they also expect the same from drivers!
Well, I never said the annoying jerks were actually racers.
The obnoxious cyclists come from the same crowd that buys 4WD, 12MPG SUVs[1] to commute in...It's all about image.
A couple coworkers of mine actually do ride in events and such, and they *ARE* courteous and safe, but I have to be
[1] The SUV is HUGE here. Like 1 in 7 vehicles is an SUV, IIRC we have/had the highest ratio in the nation.
C-X C-S
Re:some would say (Score:1)
And I guess it's hard to search for. I can only wonder what interesting sites you might find if you searched for "I want to play Alone in the Dark"
Maybe there's a palm version?
"I want to play alone in the dark with my palm" ?
Nah. That probably wouldn't help...
Re:Nice, but hardly new (Score:2)
Well, pointing it in the general direction of a satellite and not having anything in the line of sight, like a building or heavy cloud cover.
WE've had mixed results, but if you stand in one spot with a globalstar phone and don't move your head once connected it tends to work okay.
---------------------------------------------
Re:Nice, but hardly new (Score:2)
That said, they don't really "whiz" by, except in a relative sense. We find that the antenna has to be pointed AT a satellite to work, and it stays in relatively the same place unless you wait 20 minutes or so, when you may need to shift the phone a bit to get a good connection again.
Maybe as the constellations get more filled out the directional and hand-off issues will get more user-friendly.
---------------------------------------------
Nice, but hardly new (Score:3)
It may wind up being less expensive (as the initial costs were all lost), but you can do 9600 on a Globalstar (they're talking about a 30k+, not sure if thats working now or later) and 64k/channel on InMarsat (has been working for years).
InMarsat can mux together multiple 64k channels to give 128k+ IP access from anywhere on earth. it's not the cheapest way to check your email (at $30+ per minute for a 128k connection) but for remote field work there's not a lot of alternatives.
We haven't used any Iridium services, but if the Globalstar phones are any indication (and they should be, as its a pretty similar system) the biggest difficulty is keeping the antenna on a satellite. You can lose a connection very easily, and with data just getting extra noise or interference is a lot more of a pain than having the audio from a call drop out for a half-second.
Once you add dishes to the equation (to get around losing calls from moving the phone) you're basically back to using a larger (but still portable) InMarSat system. If they can come up with a decent dish setup that runs off of batteries for more than 20 minutes of connect time, Iridium would have something novel to offer.
As it stands, the only thing Iridium is bringing to the table is the potential for lower costs through competition (I'm not complaining -- that's plenty for me!)
---------------------------------------------
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
Get yourself a PDA - e.g. Pilot or Cassiopeia (color display is nice for maps) - along with a handlebar mount (not sure how well that'll work on the BikeE, I have a Vision R-45 "real" recumbent myself.) Hook the PDA up to a GPS unit - there are a few of them that will do the trick, including Magellan - any one with an NMEA interface, which is most of them, is theoretically hook-uppable, but you don't need one with any fancy user interface features. Then use mapping software like Street Atlas USA (Solus is the name of their PDA app, which you can buy in a bundle with a GPS). Now you have something much more flexible, you can dock with your PC to set up routes instead of dealing with a brain-dead consumer GPS unit, you can easily upload the records of where you went into Street Atlas on your PC, etc., and in general the geek factor will be an order of magnitude higher!
Re:Not kiloBYTES... it's kiloBITS... (Score:2)
Who said this was rs232? They don't mention all the protocols involved and you never know exactly what layer they are speaking of.
is it the radio MAC speed? Average throughput? Exact serial bits?
Re:Pricing? (Score:1)
Pricing? (Score:4)
You already can! (Score:3)
With AOL's well known idea of speed and thier new pricing plan, you can!
--
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
The sentiment of getting geeks into biking is good, though. In a way, I see biking as an extremely addictive videogame that's also good for you! A good technical trail is like a puzzle that is asking to be solved, and we all know us geeks love our puzzles...
"Intelligence is the ability to avoid doing work, yet getting the work done".
NOT "anywhere on the planet" (Score:2)
Not quite. Iridium satellites orbit between (roughly) between both polar circles. Iridium service is not available near the poles.
Re:some would say (Score:2)
In my opinion it's time to add a clause to copyright stating that if, at any time, production and sale of the product ceases in such a way that the product becomes unavailable for those who wish to obtain or purchase it, the copyright lapses and anyone should be allowed to copy or publish it. After all, the only reason there is a copyright at all is to promote more production of art through compensation, which means that if nobody is selling it anymore, there is no reason to allow the holder to retain that copyright.
Expensive (Score:2)
The ground based ways cant ever compete with the coverage of a sat network, but they can take almost every potential profitable customer there is. And the day that one in five penguins want Internet, you can be sure there will be a ground based provider opening up on the south pole too.
Re:This is great for field scientists and engineer (Score:1)
I am really sick of Quake (Score:2)
However, I couldn't imagine anybody seriously considering playing Quake over a satellite phone.
Why is it that just about every technology presented here is discussed in relation to Quake? Is it really necessary? Do people honestly think that Quake players will keep these technologies alive?
I'm more interested in ping times for it's impact on distributed computing and the development of real applications, especially those employing XMLRPC and SOAP. How quickly can I get search results from an LDAP server? Most importantly, how real-time is my telemetry data? Telemetry is the *real* killer app for technologies like this...
Re:I am really sick of telemetry (Score:2)
Basically, it's what remote weather stations, Mars rovers, satellites, etc. do. Want to monitor stats for a fleet of trucks? Want real-time geological or meteorological data from airplanes? Remote GPS tracking? Even web cams are considered telemetry devices.
The biggest problem in telemetry is the cost of doing satellite communications. Iridium will hopefully bring that cost down for terrestrial applications.
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:2)
a real bent ... (Score:1)
A nice Vision would be the next step probably, but I do like certain trikes
timothy
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:2)
that's at http://www.microship.com/ (microship.com [microship.com]) and sheesh, this guy deserves even more than the ample attention he gets
I like my lo-end bikeE though, only wish it was more of a true recumbent, which I have not yet had a chance to ride. But they certainly look even more comfortable than mine
I have the twiddler, and something like a vaio picturebook would add little to the weight of the bike
timothy
*I know some people hate walmart, and they have their reasons. I happen to rather like the place, especially to watch how formerly esoteric technology trickles into widely accessable retail stores.
Numbers (Score:1)
Speed of electromagnetic radiation: 299792458 meters/second
Ping times: 0.002 to 0.005 milliseconds (2-way)
Add another x milliseconds for turnaround, double that number for a worst-case scenario and you still have some pretty good ping times.
Re:Numbers (Score:1)
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
Have a look at the WizWheelz TerraTrike (www.wizwheelz.com [wizwheelz.com]). About a grand less than the Windcheetah and in some ways better laid out, IMHO (never been real fond of the Windcheetah's crotch joystick, for example).
(And no, I'm not affiliated in any way...I just think they make a really nice trike for the money.)
I am really sick of telemetry (Score:1)
©o,,o©©o,,o©©©o,
1s ping: They should be able to do better than tha (Score:2)
Technically, they should be able to do much better than that. While for geostationary satellites (with bidirectional comms), it's hard to get down latency to less than half a second, due to 4 times distance divided by speed of light, Iridiums low-orbiting LEO satellites should be able to give you much better ping times, considering they are so much closer. It's a pity that they're squandering thisnatural advantage of low-orbit by using cheap ground-equipment.
And 2400 kbps is nothing to phone home about either. Many geostationary systems can give you up to 40 Mbps bandwidth.
And it's probably much more expensive than most geostationary solutions either. Case in point: Italy's Netsystem [netsystem.com] is even free of charge, for Chrissakes!
So which advantage stays? Availability from anywhere in the world? Hey, just walk into a damn cybercafé if you want check your mail during a holiday. Btw, cybercafes are much easyer to find in Third World countires that in Europe or the US, because few locals have a computer at home, and thus cybercafes do have a market other than tourists.
Re:Only 'UPTO' 10 Kb/s (Score:2)
Even an outdoor antenna doesn't guarantee coverage; Iridium can be shadowed by buildings, thick foliage, etc. It's probably fine from most roofs. It's truly a service for people who are out standing in their field.
Re:some would say (Score:1)
Re:some would say (Score:1)
Re:some would say (Score:1)
Re:some would say (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Nice, but hardly new (Score:1)
This is great for field scientists and engineers (Score:3)
Very old news (Score:3)
I researched this 9600 bps option for Cambodian community infrastructure.. but even with two of the Iridium investors being close to the leader of this project we still didn't buy into it.
They've been saying the same thing about how this fills a need for a long time, but other companies have also provided satellite data services for a long time.
You need a purchase case for a mobile phone or terminal. Doesn't compute unless maybe you're in the military.. or they have dropped prices from orbit.
Re:Pricing? (Score:1)
Re:Not kiloBYTES... it's kiloBITS... (Score:2)
Where do you get this? 9.6Kb / 8 = 1200 bytes/sec.
Re:wait... (Score:1)
They can now offer this service only because the US Department of Defense infused them with sufficient operating capital to keep going.
Here is their "reannouncement" [yahoo.com] on Yahoo News.
Re:some would say (Score:1)
Solution: Kill all the game developers now, so all the games will be free in 50 years!
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
If you surf over to their site... check out the video of the jet powered 'bent. OMFG. Gimme.
Now I just need to talk myself into spending the cash on a Wind Cheetah trike.
Re:Didn't the US Navy get an exclusive? (Score:1)
This post [slashdot.org] seems to say as much (and it's +5) but the link it gives now points to a news page which is no longer relevant.
--
Access from anywhere (Score:1)
Re:Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? (Score:2)
Re:Access from anywhere (Score:1)
I think it is pretty easy to travel somewhere where there aren't phone lines.
Just Stay Out of My Way (Score:1)
And before you flame me, I ride my mountainbike several times a week.
Re:IRC From Anywhere? (Score:1)
Modern l337 implementations require bandwidth that is at least comparable to home-grade DSL. Case in point: I am posting this via a 28.8 modem. So while I am clearly able to be condescending (as in, "ha, ha! you misspelled condescending!"), this post's lack of positive moderation demonstrates a lack of l337 capabilities. And I am very l337, I assure you; the same post sent via T3 would have been personally modded to "+63, Homosexual Attraction" by Hemos upon being posted. If you aren't the newbie your UID implies, you would know that Hemos has performed similar "alterations" in the past.
Note the further use of condescension.
Anyhoo, I've wasted enough of reader time, good night.
--
some would say (Score:1)
Re:Access from anywhere (Score:1)
And, since you're still wondering, "what the !@#$% would anyone want with THAT?", I'll tell you: the NPO I work for has folks in, for example, Djibouti. Yes way, Ted! "INTERNET CAFE!? We'd be happy to find a TELEPHONE!" (Perhaps the IP via carrier pigeon has an application after all.) Anyway, for these locations with sporadic connectivity, Lotus Notes, with its replicated databases, works quite well. Better, in fact, than, say, trying to read your Hotmail over a line that won't stay up more than 3 minutes at a time. (And don't try to sell us on POP/IMAP with PGP - Notes does the security thang much easier than PGP).
*IF* these come in at reasonable rates, they will be Just What We've Been Looking For. So There.
Re:Pirate Communication (Score:1)
*actual* prices for iridium service (Score:1)
Summary: after all the initialization fees it costs $1.50/minute ($0.50/minute before Nov. 2001) or $0.99/minute if calling another iridium subscriber.
Who's With Me?
$300 for 9600kbps? (Score:4)
Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
Doh! They can just disable your number. (Score:1)
All they need is your number. And that isn't too hard to get nowadays.
They've got to be able to cut off people who don't pay those astronomical bills y'know.
But at least we haven't got to the "Repent Harlequin said the Tick Tock Man" stage (by Harlan "Mr. Long Book Titles" Ellison)...
Cheerio,
Link.
Re:Nice, but hardly new (Score:2)
In any case, I want one - but I don't want to pay the bills. A cool toy, but it's pretty useless for 99% of the population because it'd be cheaper to call a normal ISP over a usual cellphone. (which, if you're outside the USA, will work in almost any other country)
Other than that, this is a great move forward. I can't wait until we all have a shitload of wireless high bandwidth connectivity, a la Snowcrash and many other thought provoking novels.
Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? (Score:2)
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:2)
Re:Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? (Score:2)
Also remember that the sattelites themselves are only one part of the equasion -- they still have to pay for ground staff, antenna farms, Telco connectivity, electricity, insurance, and a dozen other things. Just because they inherited a bunch of capital equipment doesn't mean they have negligible operating expenses -- most, if not all, of the $58 mil in "profit" you cite is going to be soaked up by day-to-day operating expenses.
Face it, it was a bad idea to begin with. The technology was obsolete before they even launched the first satellite. The original investors in this boondoggle lost billions; the fact that some clever folks found a way to eek out a living off of the debris left after the original company crashed and burned does not negate the fact that the Iridium system is poorly concieved and implemented. Like a chicken with it's head cut off, it's still running around and squawking, but it's only a matter of time before it keels over - and there's nothing that can prevent it's demise.
Cool! (Score:1)
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:1)
----
So in the very best case, the ping time will be *at least* half a second, and I suspect probably closer to a second in reality. Forget playing Quake in Antartica
Is the phone realy needed? (Score:1)
a/s/l (Score:2)
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:1)
And that's totally ignoring the fact that if you are traveling to a place remote enough that you would need to connect to the internet via satellite, any overwhelming urge to play Quake ought to be countered with an equally overwhelming urge to paint the walls with one's own brains. Sheesh, get a life.
--
< )
( \
X
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:1)
[Insert Tongue in Cheek]
You would likely need a text mode version of quake. And play only other people on polar expeditions.
wireless text mode quake vs the russians.
could possibly compete with WAP mode Quake.
Check out the Vinny the Vampire [eplugz.com] comic strip
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:1)
I forget what height they orbit at, I daresay someone will tell me....
Re:Is the phone realy needed? (Score:1)
Do you mean like the Nokia CardPhone 2.0 [nokia-asia.com]?
Driving is already bad enough as it is! :-) (Score:1)
wonderful
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
Re:Just Stay Out of My Way (Score:1)
Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
Ah, the French company Mavic has made these for years. I see guys with them every now and then. Apparently the early ones had some problems, but v2.0 is supposedly pretty nice.
I haven't tried them, but they make other nice stuff... wheels, brakes, cranks. Check it out.
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
You'd have to define "cyclist" - the serious ones know the vehicle code, and well. It's the helmetless redneck riding facing INTO traffic running red lights you need to worry about.
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:1)
Of course, ping time is minimal, infact less then the ping time from one side of america to the other via fibre with no stops on route (these satelites are only a few hundered miles up - maybe 1000 round trip)
Re:Pricing? (Score:1)
Oh well at least we have more chance of one of them hitting the Taco Bell platform due to the sheer numbers.
Slow speed but also horrendous ping time (Score:2)
So in the very best case, the ping time will be *at least* half a second, and I suspect probably closer to a second in reality. Forget playing Quake in Antartica ...
Um these guys have their terms confused... (Score:1)
note that it specificaly says kiloBYTES
the question here is, is this a typo, or is it really kilobytes and the writer, Jim Wolf, just doesn't have a clue that "56k" is 56kilobits and not kilobytes...?
BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) (Score:1)
Anyways, I hope that more bikers get into puters, and vice versa. Maybe then, I'll get a chance to have a microchip-controlled rear derailleur (and don't recommend the shimano crap)
Sounds cool (Score:1)
Re:Sounds cool (Score:1)
IRC From Anywhere? (Score:1)
Re:Why I like this (Score:1)
Also, the Chinese government has control of the airwaves in China. If Iridium doesn't have a license, they can't operate there. They must make concessions to make the government happy. I believe that Iridium blocks access from countries that haven't issued licenses. That's also why satellite communications prices are so high--- to satisfy countries with state-owned telecom monopolies.
New summer job. (Score:1)
Already done (sort of) (Score:2)
If you need satellite access Orbcomm had the first LEO satellite constellation. I think in some areas, satellites store the messages until they are in sight of a ground station, so its not completely real time, but works just fine for trucking and remote sensing apps. In fact, some oil fields are controlled via the network.
Re:some would say (Score:1)
No, the Iridium sats are in LEO (Score:5)
Pirate Communication (Score:4)
I have heard of pirate radio stations that operate like this: A van loaded with a transmitter and other broadcasting equipment drives around a small area, say a few square miles. The F.C.C. always has a hard-on to catch these guys.
When the current incarnation of Iridium declares bankruptcy and threatens a satellite storm and is bailed out by the government and sold for pennies on the dollar, the new owners will be able to implement significantly higher transmission rates and sell the service at a bargain. People who pirate tunez, warez, or pr0n could locate themselves in a dense urban area, say NYC, and cruise around on a bike or on foot, broadcasting anything. The F.C.C. guys would be able to get GPS coordinates for the location, but if you factor in the error and the population density, it would be practically impossible to locate the perpetrator.
People tend to think technology will be used to enslave us, but here is a case of technology increasing liberty.