2b Or !2b: Shakespeare TxtMsg Contest 159
FortKnox writes "Reuters has an article on a contest for the most aspiring text message. It has to be under 160 characters, because it follows the trendy text-messaging for modern mobile phones. Most people will try to make long quotes with abbreviations and numbers and such to bring it down to the appropriate length."
Re:All your cellphones are... (Score:1)
{
you->base[i]->belonger = this;
}
In Japan... (Score:1)
For example to say "let's go to see a movie" could be expressed as 818 321504, which can be pronounced, "eiga miniikouyo"
In Japanese...
8='hachi' or in english 'eight'
1='ichi' or in 'one' or it looks like the katakana character which is pronouned 'E'
8=it can also be read 'ga' in this case. no idea why.
3=pronounced 'san' or 'mitsu' so, in this case, 'mi'
2='ni' or 'hutatsu' so we use 'ni'
1=like the katakana character for 'E' again.
5='go' or 'itsutsu' in this case, we use go, which is the same character for 'ko' minus just one " looking thing.
0=it looks like English 'O' so it's pronounced like that in this case.
4='yon', or 'shi', so in this case we just take the first part, 'yon' and reduce it to yo.
Oh my Gott.
I can't believe I can explain this. Japanese is insane. I also can't believe people could understand this stuff, let alone write it fluently.
Now everyone has cell phones that have full text messaging support so there is little need for this method anymore. Though most people still remember it.
Good but Not Original (Score:2)
You have to be a subscriber to submit poems (Score:2)
Not "aspiring" (Score:1)
Re:133t-speak (Score:1)
tell HORATIO; length(hevN+Rth) > philosophy->dreams;
Oh, this wasn't a perl poetry contest? Sorry...
Breakfast at Tiffany's (Score:1)
W: VFX
P: FUNEM?
W: VFM
P: OK, MNX!
argh, I'm not using too many caps, they're all acronyms! or at least phonetic acronyms... hmm
Re: (Score:1)
160 Characters? Can it be in Chinese ? (Score:1)
Can the text be in the Chinese characters?
A 160-characters piece in the Chinese language is no longer a short text, and A LOT can be said with 160 characters.
Therefore, let me repeat my question - Can the text be in the Chinese characters ???
Code from the Bard (Score:5)
* William Shakespeare
* (C) 1595 Globe company software
*/
/* Compose this operation from arithmatic of the signed nature. Thusly -1 resounds as more ominous than doth 255 W.S. */
signed char question=(0x2b | ~0x2b);
int n1=nobility(suffering_slings & suffering arrows);
int n2=nobility(taking_arms & opposing_to_end);
/* Though this nobility score be calculated, meethinks that the optimizer shall remove it anon, for it does find no utility in the code W.S. */
int comparison=n1>n2;
rub();
shuffle_off(mortal_coil);
pause();
/* If Bacon thinks I shall share these codes with him, he doth have another thing coming. W.S.
All Thine Sonnet are belonging to us */
Re:here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:1)
i love this one.... (Score:2)
QQQQ
I'd love to pick up the phone and answer "hello, four queue!"
i want 1% if that goes anywhere.
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:1)
--
ow. (Score:1)
Re:a free verse poem celebrating conciseness, logi (Score:2)
No spaces this way.
Re:Please explain (Score:1)
Have a look here [allyourbase.org], and you'll become enlightened. In short: it's from an introduction to a game that went through a lousy translation into English.
Re:Correction... (Score:1)
---
Ode to text on a cell phone (Score:3)
Who could not wait 'til he got home
HIs email he read
"It's important!" he said
'Til his car toward a semi did roam
From when rec.humor.funny was (Score:1)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
Date: 8 Feb 92 00:30:05 GMT
whereis biff? crypt at source. biff cut yacc tail, yacc cut biff finger.
"awk!," sed biff.
"ar, ar!" sed yacc.
ksh, bash! man cut head, kill yacc at last, make strings.
exit crypt, find mail from su. od. "date? yes." biff find su nice.
make time, date. find su at wall. tee, talk.
ed: "tip: find jobs, biff."
"yes, make tar," sed biff.
su, biff date more: touch, strip, sleep.
"su, inetd perl," sed biff.
"yes!" sed su.
Old joke (if you can call it that) (Score:2)
[written on paper]
Translate this hillbilly conversation:
MR Ducks
MR Not
OSAR
CM Wangs
LIB
MR Ducks
What does this say?
The answer is left as an exercise for the reader...
Somehow, this seems rather similar to SMS.
Correction... (Score:5)
2b || !2b
(well, for programmers at least)
I'm probably showing my age.... (Score:1)
Re:this is so lame (Score:1)
---
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Re:this is so lame (Score:1)
---
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Re:this is so lame (Score:2)
> I can't wait until colleges begin offering
> AOLSpeak 101.
>
Yay! Time for a rant. Divert your eyes if you are sensetive to ranting and raving.
I am in a third year systems analyst course at an unnamed (*coughSheridancoughCollegecough*) Canadian College. I don't expect my classmates to be brilliant computer wonders who eat design and shit code. However, I am at a loss to describe the level of illeteracy in our entire group. With a few exceptions, the average person in our class has a literacy level of about grade 9. It's disgusting to think that we will graduate in December and these people can barely read and write english (let alone program, document, or design solutions). The college is very well respected for it's animation and illustration departments (Disney and ILM take most of our anim/illus grads) and has a decent reputation for it's computer schools. What I fear is that my class will get out into the workforce and, for all intensive purposes, smear the name of the College and destroy anything my diploma will stand for.
The Slashdot crowd would enjoy some of the phrases these people have come up with in a recent report. It makes the "all your base are belong to us" look like Shakespiere in comparison. I'm not great at english (lord knows I can barely spell at times) and I don't really expect that. But they have no ideas, no opinions, no ambition, no goals, no desire, and possess nothing to offer the IT industry.
Worse yet, I see and hear everyday that I am not alone - schools across the country are experiencing the exact same thing. People are coming into "computer techology / IT" courses simply because they are told they will be successful. We now have the illeterate drop-out Bill Gates wannabe's - minus the business savvy and intelligence.
Being a systems analyst is all about communication - the ability to design and document new systems. I fear that the majority of people in my course do not possess anything close to this and should have left a long time ago.
I've tried working with them. I've tried helping them. I've tried pushing them. I've tried encouraging them. Nothing works.
Worse yet is that I am forced to do projects with them. I want to be proud of my submissions and I end up doing all of the work - including their work would be equivlant to smearing fecal matter over my work. I'm not perfect - I am trying to learn. These people, however, are only here for the money and it's pissing me off.
See? I warned you.
---
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Re:this is so lame (Score:2)
"There is a risk that people will choose other companies over our company that's why it is important to advertise our corporation the best way we can to attract businessees or individual to us."
"If we want to hire a person for programmer position then minimum qualification would be Diploma or Degree and minimum of 6 months experience in the relative field."
"The key people within our business are basically the four co-owners of the business."
"Our products will primarily be produced within Software Solutions building. Packaging is as simple as placing the CD in a box with the appropriate documentation contained." [note: this one REALLY gets me because they NEVER explain who creates the documentation or the software. Our fictional company would develop software and documentation internally and sell that to clients.]
I had to re-write a 40 page report in less than a day - including researching potential competition, market trends, costs, etc. Even worse, it took them 4 weeks to write that bullshit (and there is A LOT more where that comes from).
Ni.
---
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Re:this is so lame (Score:2)
It's fustrating to do the work of four people.
---
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
Re:Text messaging sucks (Score:1)
15c to send a text message "Will be home late"
$4.50 to call and tell her, plus you interrupt the meeting you're in and the boss tells you not to bother coming back and you can't afford your mobile phone because you have no job to pay the overpriced bills.
Real difficult choice there...
--
Matt
Quote of the year... (Score:2)
You are fired. Pack your bags.
Wrong headline... (Score:2)
$_ = $q.
Kevin Fox
--
R & J (Score:2)
$h1.dignity eq $h2.dignity;
setScene(VERONA);
$h1.mutiny.renew($h2);
(civil) $hands.taint((civil) $blood);
And so on...
Kevin Fox
--
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:2)
Perhaps a more accurate way to convey Hamlets intent is:
switch $2b
case true: (blahblah from speech)
case flase: (blahblah from speech)
Or, even shorter:
$2b?stuff_to_live_for:ways_to_end_it_all;
Kevin Fox
--
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:5)
Actually, 2b | !2b is more accurate. '||' denotes a short-circuit 'or' which means that if 2b is true, it won't examine !2b for validity.
I believe that Hamlet's strife is that he saw the merits in both possibilities, and so an accurate representation would necessitate him evaluating both 2b and !2b before reaching a conclusion.
Kevin Fox
--
Re:Correction... (Score:1)
-B
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:1)
2b || !2b
confusion (Score:1)
Visit that link - it made my day! (Score:1)
Text messaging sucks (Score:2)
It's a PHONE, for god sakes. What's wrong with actually using the NUMBER BUTTONS on the phone and using them to CALL people??? I guess voice is soo 20th century.
A Practical Reason to Shrink DeCSS (Score:2)
Re:A Practical Reason to Shrink DeCSS (Score:2)
Re:Hamlett quote reduced to "0" (Score:1)
I think I have the right to say that the Hamlett quote is reduced to "0". Which is true off course...
Re: SMS messages == no talking (Score:1)
Re:this is so lame (Score:1)
--
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:1)
Maybe Hamlet is the cat!
--
Re:160 Characters? Can it be in Chinese ? (Score:1)
--
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:1)
Re:here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:1)
HO = a chaud
OQ = au cul
She's got hotness of the ass. (I translated that literally to show my disrepect).
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:1)
Re:Correction... (Score:2)
Hmmm (Score:2)
obfuscated code on perlmonks and see if I can dig up some winning entries.
Actually, it should be: (Score:2)
------------
CitizenC
Re:Correction... (Score:1)
deCSS (Score:1)
for freaks sake .. (Score:1)
Re:predictive or ergonomic? (Score:1)
Some brands have little keypads that attach to the bottom (kind of like those fold out keyboards for palm pilots), but I really don't see SMS becoming all that relevant once 3G/Wap/bluetooth, comes into widespread use.
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:2)
Re:Okay, so we have SMS messages... (Score:1)
Re:All your cellphones are... (Score:1)
aspire 2 inspire (Score:1)
take advantage of it
Of Wisdom... (Score:1)
YYUR YYUB ICURYY4Me
Disclaimer: This is not original!
NOT OFF TOPIC! (Score:1)
As one example:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1166
here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:5)
Re:here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:1)
Re:here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:1)
ahhhh...of course, I read it "divided by", not "over".
Thanks *looks sheepish*
Isn't it obvious? (Score:4)
Re:Correction... (Score:1)
(well, for programmers at least)
Yes, but I wouldn't make much sense to the sysadmin.
'to be pipe pipe not to be'? Is that some kind of dirty talk or something?
--
Hi Koo (Score:2)
Our minds are the only confine.
Let your code be free.
Re:Hi Koo (Score:2)
It comes from trying to recite from memory, and not checking your originals...
--
Prison just in thought.
Our minds are but a confine.
Let your code be free.
#define QUESTION(b) ((b)1 | ~((b)1)) (Score:2)
Re:#define QUESTION(b) ((b)1 | ~((b)1)) (Score:2)
Here it is again:
#define QUESTION(b) ((b)>>1 | ~((b)>>1))
-1 (Score:1)
(gdb) p 0x2b|~0x2b
$1 = -1
42 (Score:1)
Re:Not "aspiring" (Score:1)
this is so lame (Score:4)
I can't wait until colleges begin offering AOLSpeak 101.
-gerbik
Shakespeare in a nutshell (Score:1)
I'm going to go memorize all of the digits of pi now. I'll be back when I'm finished
"I do not suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it"
Don't Act Surprised (Score:4)
what happn
somebody set up us da bmb
we get signl
what
phone screen trn on
how r u gentlemen
all your trendy txtmsg r belng 2 us
what u say
Re:i love this one.... (Score:1)
He says it's a type of queue.
Link.
Re:predictive or ergonomic? (Score:2)
Admittedly, it does take a bit of getting used to - it took me about 10 messages before I really got the hang of it, but then... how long did it take you to learn to type efficiently?
One other thing to watch out for is the specific implementation of predictive text input - I find the Motorola version substantially better than the implementation on Nokias, as it provides a list of its best predictions in a line at the bottom of the screen that can be selected using the left/right or up/down keys, and it also automatically learns new words rather than having to manually add them to the dictionary.
Re:Note to all these ppl that dont like txt msgs (Score:2)
BT Cellnet > BT Cellnet off peak = 2p/minute
Text message = 10p
I can talk for 2.5 minutes or send 160 characters
for the same price
Which is preferable?
The Master Of Muppets,
Re:here is a nice one. damn ambitious too. (Score:5)
Re:this is so lame (Score:2)
I didn't realize that text messages were sentient. (Score:3)
Then again, maybe the person just meant inspiring.
Re:Correction... (Score:2)
Actually, since X || !X is always true since at least one of those must be true, you could shorten it to:
1
---
The AOL-Time Warner-Microsoft-Intel-CBS-ABC-NBC-Fox corporation:
Re:GFY (Score:2)
Tell me what makes you so afraid
Of all those people you say you hate
Hamlett quote reduced to 1 charecter! (Score:2)
it should be: 2b||!2b
and while we are at it, that mathematically equels "true"
which in computer land is "1"
so there you have it, the infamous Hamlett quote reduced to "1"
---------------------------------
Slash Sig: proposed change? (Score:2)
And change the allowed length of the sig to match. What's forty more characters?
Check out the Vinny the Vampire [clik.to] comic strip
Re:Hamlett quote reduced even further! (Score:2)
Actually, Hamlet's quote reduces even more, and much more elegantly, to one qubit!
--
Re:Okay, so we have SMS messages... (Score:2)
MT already discussed stuff like this. (Score:2)
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.
Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.
Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
The actual page (Score:5)
Re:Correction... (Score:2)
2b || !2b
(well, for programmers at least)
Not for Perl programmers.
(Dare I say it? I dare, I dare...)
Re:Wrong headline... (Score:2)
In other words, it would evaluate to false no matter what, since he doesn't yet know the answer to either question when he asks them.
That's deep, man!
Re:Not "aspiring" (Score:2)
Poets aspire.
Words inspire.
Athletes perspire.
Warranties expire.
Sears tower no longer tallest because it lacks a spire. [slashdot.org]
-----
D. Fischer
Re:Correction... (Score:2)
which basically turns into
which, for most compilers, becomes just a block with name scoping.
--
"Moderate down and we'll get your balls in Meta-Moderate."
Re:Correction (Score:2)
Call of Cthulhu (Score:2)
How about... (Score:4)
A few suggestions:
spm = spam
fstp = first post (fp is taken - "floating point")
ayb1 = All your base are belong to us.
$M = Microsoft is a horrible, money grabbing useless institution.
L! = Linux is a wonderful, beutiful thing.
CTO = Commander Taco
Hemos = well...its already pretty short.
ILB = I like beans.
YCUAL = you can't have any until later
HN/DTA = Have some now, but don't tell anyone
We could also use verbs as operands...
For example - kills = k
kL!$M - Linux, the wonderful, beautiful thing kills Microsoft the horrible, money grabbing institution.
Of course, we could, I don't know...just zip it up and unzip it? Its not like zip is a difficult protocol to implement on a palm...
2 cents (Score:2)
quirky
say it again sam
hoochies like a mo' fo [antioffline.com]
it would be neat... (Score:2)
Text message poetry? Geez ... (Score:3)