Comment Re:AI is designed to allow wealth to access skill (Score 1) 77
it is what you want to say, not me obviously, stop lying.
it is what you want to say, not me obviously, stop lying.
There are literally millions of people doing nothing today, what you are advocating here has already happened, why aren't you happy anyway, is it because it's never enough? AFAIC everyone who can work should be taking care of himself/herself, government must not steal from one to subsidize another, especially in the system basically designed for complete corruption (and it is designed for complete corruption).
It is up to everyone individually to survive on this planet, if there are too many people unable to survive then it's a self correcting issue - they will not survive.
14 years ago I picked mailchimp because it could read RSS feeds from my Knights of Columbus blog and send out daily digests.
We had a small form in an iframe allowing people to sign up to get the digests.
This year, something broke in the "detect a human" code for that small form, and I am getting hundreds of thousands of signups of the form "valid email address" "gibberish first name" "gibberish last name" and I can't figure out why.
drone batteries have to be heated otherwise drones may not even take off, Ukrainian soldiers in the field use all sorts of ways to keep the batteries warm, for example chemical hand warmers are used for this.
Just stand back and watch 'em take each other out.
There is a long list of times during this - and the previous - Trump Administration when it seemed clear that would happen. We thought they finally got to the point where they wouldn't be able to stand each other and they would annihilate their own. Never before did it happen; indeed they only rallied harder each time and came out stronger.
Now they have a new martyr. Any time anyone doesn't toe the MAGA line they will be accused of leading towards "another Charlie Kirk". In fact they could have hardly asked for a better event, as they can use it to also brush any other gun violence crime under the rug as well.
Say goodbye to democracy. Charlie Kirk managed to do exactly what he wanted - he killed it. He wasn't wise enough to realize it would take his own blood to take it down, but it is dead and buried now. The new Single Party State rises up now, and by the end of next month it will be illegal to be a democrat.
Right now is a good time to invest in your exit strategy if you don't align yourself 110% with the MAGA party.
And stop with pushing/encouraging violence.
Where did I encourage violence? You must have me mistaken with someone else. I have multiple times very plainly advocated against violence in all forms. I don't approve killing anyone by anyone else. Not by or for politics, not by or for the state. Murder is wrong, period.
Look at the 1960s.
In the 1960s the assassinations were of people who wanted to improve our country and bring about progress. This decade we're seeing assassinations of people of all stripes. There is no rhyme or reason to the violence any more. The only difference is that one party advocates exclusively for "thoughts and prayers" after any killing, because they are afraid their owners will drive them out of their cushy jobs if they ever propose any kind of legislative reform.
Finally, SCOTUS doesn't have the power to stop a constitutional amendment nor does Trump have the ability to create one.
I didn't say anyone would make a new amendment. I said that the MAGA party would ignore the 22nd Amendment, and that the SCOTUS would not stop them from doing so. That's a big difference. Indeed a constitutional amendment is only passed by congress; the SCOTUS cannot make one. Up until now, the POTUS has been expected to follow the constitution, but that is no longer the case. Nobody is willing to apply any laws to Trump.
Only with a significant majority (2/3) of both houses of Congress or 2/3 of the state legislatures passing combined with 3/4 of the states ratifying can pass a new constitutional amendment. There is no judicial review for a constitutional amendment
Again, nobody is looking to pass a new amendment, nor are they looking to repeal one on the books. They have license to simply ignore the constitution, and they will do exactly that. The constitution is no longer worth the paper it was written on.
virtualbox is good but irrelevant to this conversation as it's not used in the enterprise so vmware doesn't care about it.
the feather to leaf however might be an overreaction, but ultimately harmless.
Is it harmless? That's an opinion. Not one I share either.
Is the change an overreaction? That's also an opinion. My answer is, it is no more an "over reaction" than people clammoring for the change in the first place is .
Why is it NOT an overreaction when a feather needs to be changed because someone somewhere was offended, and removing it offends someone else? Who's Offense Matters MORE? Is it offensive or is it honoring? That is the real question and who gets to decide?
And Who gets to decide who decides? Thats the real problem.
what a non-issue. USA buys nuclear fuel from Russia, supporting the Russian side of the war, and then has the gall to tell poorer countries they are bad for buying Russisn fossil fuel. USA also still buys other Russian goods.
Hypocrisy, why would any sane country appease any US demands about trade with Ruusia? There is a whole world to develop alternative business in and more than half the human race lives in Asia.
With that said, standby for the likely canonization of him by the right, with him morphing into a saint who loved everyone and who never did anything wrong.
He's already getting a complimentary ride on Air Force Two. I'm trying to think of other non-politicians who were not war heroes whose corpses got Presidential or VP escorts and not thinking of any...
The truth, however, is that in a year no one will be talking about him or his ideas. The performative rage machine will move on to another 'personality' spewing the same shit.
Except each time the rage machine gets louder and more profane. At some point if it doesn't come back down to earth we're going to have a real problem. Time to get more supplies for the bug-out bags.
As for POTUS, it looks like he's busy having a stroke (there are pics all over the net) so I doubt he has the wherewithal to plan anything beyond what he wants for lunch.
You're probably right on that. However there are plenty in Trump's orbit who would be willing to enable something like this to happen to draw their base away from the Epstein saga. I probably gave him way too much credit to suggest he could have dreamed this up on his own. He wasn't even of above-average intelligence when he hosted The Apprentice, and he's shown just how little one can learn in 4 years when they really try hard.
"Home life as we understand it is no more natural to us than a cage is to a cockatoo." -- George Bernard Shaw