Here's the point: any system is open to abuse.
How did you come to that conclusion from what you posted to? It was not the point you seemed to be trying to make when you originally posted the JE, and does not seem to be the point he was after. Furthermore, if
any system is open to abuse
as you just claimed, then you are also admitting that you system wouldn't be perfect either - presumably you just are more fond of the people who would abuse it than the people who you think are best positioned to abuse the current system.
For the linked thought experiment
How did you conclude it to be a thought experiment, when the author claimed that millions were doing it?
to the "complete BS", there would have to be zero (0) abuse going on.
You are applying a vastly different criteria for this system than what you would accept in yours, there.
As a side note, you are making more grammatical errors lately. Perhaps you should take some time to think through what you are typing.
Is that what you're saying?
Of course not. I am stating that the bit you linked to is so twisted and fact-free that even you should realize it is fantasy and not a reflection of reality. It claims things that it cannot possibly even begin to support.