You wouldn't know the facts if they hit you on the head. This is the source:
https://searchepsteinfiles.com...

From this you somehow manage to infer the following:

"So apparently Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump sucked Bill Clinton's dick and Vladimir Putin has the pictures.

Stop, read that again, Google it, and just Jesus fucking Christ what the hell is wrong with our world?"

NONE of the shit you spouted above is anything even remotely resembling a "fact". FFS you even manage to get the speaker wrong. It was Jeffrey's brother who made the statement.

What makes me uncomfortable is coming to obviously absurd conclusions based on shit information and then proceeding to wonder "what the hell is wrong with our world".. Look in the goddamn mirror.

What the hell is wrong with YOU? Get some mental help or something dude... your rantings are completely unhinged.

One thing that is different this time is there has been very little retaliation while Smoot Hawley triggered a trade war between all nations. I think the only countries that retaliated this time were Canada and China.

LLMs are simple feed forward networks run in a loop. They make no use of "statistical analysis" nor is there a "knowledge base".

The just statistics statements are as useful as saying just autocomplete or just deterministic. These are completely meaningless statements that in no way address capabilities of the underlying system.

It's is shorthand for "it is" ... "change its underlying probability" not "change it is underlying probability". "adapt its output" not "adopt it is output".

This is gobbledygook. You are guessing and have no actual clue how the technology works.

More unhinged nonsense from a clueless clown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

I would say under-regulation, or more to the point, mal-regulation. Unregulated markets inevitably settle into a worst case scenario given time.

In the case of residential property (which is what your link refers to), I agree that some of the regulations there are bad and need to be revised or eliminated. But they have nothing to do with the commercial space falling into squalor.

I suppose it is mostly the first one. Of course, the emotion it evokes is mostly disgust and anger. The second also evokes emotions. Milder, more positive ones.

My observation has been that any streaming package that includes ESPN is automatically well more than 4 times as expensive as any package without it. Perhaps the cable companies should find a way to dump ESPN and pass along the savings to remain viable.

It'll be at least half of that in ten years.

The Zoomers have no interest in cable TV.

> Why not just build the proper infrastructure with what we know works?

I tried to do this locally. The government allows the pole owner (electric or telephone usually) to charge $50/mo/pole to the startup that wishes to hang wires.

The owner pays $5/mo in property taxes to the town.

There are exceptions for large corporations that are in the state's good graces.

It's just to keep competition limited to the cartel.

Short answer: corrupt government.

This was my first thought as well.

Such marketplace confusion!

Too much money for not enough content.

When I had my morning toast and coffee earlier today I chose between three YouTube videos. An analysis of a high-performance motorcycle engine, a review of an off-road vehicle and troubleshooting a hybrid car. All cable ever has these days is reality shows.

...laura

And yet, I can still get parts to maintain my 46 year old truck. Still stocked at the local parts store. So I'm going to keep driving that, polluting stink bomb that it is.

How do you square these two things? For what other reason would Trump pull strings to furnish a pedo like Maxwell with a luxury prison cell while publicly floating the possibility of pardoning her? Why do it?

Never gonna happen. Full price was before 10 years of decay and rodent infestation + neighborhood gone to shit. Nevertheless, high supply, low demand is supposed to result in low prices.

One, how so if the agreement is ownership in common. And two, how is it worse than it all being owned by a (land)lord who rakes in the better part of the profit while considering herding animals to be beneath him?

Sounds like you drank the cool aid.