Only someone totally ignorant of history can seriously think that this is what you are looking at today. Hitler is what we'll get, in 10 or 20 years, if we don't get Trump now.
Here are the three options:
1) The American dream dies. The Anglo-American people lose control of their homeland. (80% of the rest of the world dies of starvation shortly after when the replacements discover that the USA wasn't built on magic dirt.)
2) Something similar to nationalism asserts itself in the US. So far, Trump looks like our best shot. He may not believe it, but he is saying all of the right things, and pretty much no one else is. The Anglo-American people retain their homeland. Globalists are offended and some people are relocated, but essentially no one dies.
3) People like you make quasi-nationalism impossible, and the Anglo-American people decide, finally, when they reach the point of collectively having nothing to lose, not to allow their own genocide. Something similar to ultra-nationalism asserts itself with rivers of blood and mountains of corpses. Think of this as Hitler 2.0.
If you think that Hitler rose to power by whipping the German people into a frenzy of hatred against the jews, you'll think I'm nuts. But consider this, they kept the holocaust mostly secret, even from their own people.
If you managed to learn some history despite your education, you'll see the parallels pretty clearly. The German people turned to their National Socialist party because they were the only people strong enough to stand up to the international socialists (aka Communists).
America 2025 is not German 1925, so there will be differences. But the core story is the same, people facing the loss of their country and the death of their nation rarely go peacefully.
I said quasi-nationalism before because I don't think that we will be looking at Nationalism, exactly, but something like it. The threat appears to be facing all of the west together, and I expect the west to be somewhat unified by it. I say somewhat because I don't expect the EU to survive, nor the meddling internationalist institutions around it.
I personally prefer option #2 by a very wide margin, but I think #3 is more likely. If anyone has a 4th option, I'd love to hear it, as long as it doesn't involve magic dirt.