Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Just speculating. (Score 1) 72

Maybe that few-years-old gas-powered car that is still perfectly functional is preferable to a pricey upgrade to a shiny new car

No. That would explain a general lack of new car sales, but that's not what's happening. It is only EV sales that are stagnating. People are still buying gas cars.

EV sales are booming in China. A big reason is much lower prices. In China, EVs are cheaper than equivalent ICE cars. That is also true in Southeast Asia, which imports EVs from China. But the West restricts EV imports, so the prices are much higher.

Comment Re:Just speculating. (Score 2) 72

Electric vehicles are one of those things that are a really good idea in theory but out in the real world they are just simply unworkable.

And yet, the situation is neither simple nor unworkable.

(1) The combined profits of the major European and American oil companies were $200 billion in 2022. They are not going to just give up and go away. They are working hard against the adoption of electric vehicles in order to protect their profits..

What I'm hearing is that a large corporate body's interests are against the the best-interests of our species. That they aren't going to give up and go away doesn't preclude us from fighting them and making them go away. Stopping subsidizing them will help. Penalizing them for their toxic product will help. Publicizing their manipulation of public opinion will help.

There was a time when dealing with the tobacco industry was unthinkable. Now smoking is a niche habit and mostly if you see someone doing it, they're standing beside a jackhammer, pouring concrete, or operating heavy machinery.

(2) Electric vehicles are too expensive, and a large percentage of the population simply cannot afford them.

I'm sure that people who preferred horses felt that way about automobiles at one point. Prices go down as production goes up. That's how things work. You wouldn't have given up on cell phones because they were elites-only pricing, right?

(3) A large percentage of the population lives in houses/apartments where installing chargers would be difficult or impossible. I have lived in those sort of places myself.

Indoor plumbing and sanitary sewers are also simply unworkable for the exact same reason. There are a whole lot of houses outside of dense cities. And yet. We find a way. The network gets bigger and bigger and bigger and while there will always be a market for outhouses and septic tanks, the number of serviced houses just climbs. EV technology and charging capability has only improved with time, rapidly.

(4) A large percentage of the population lives in houses/apartments that they are renting. Who is going to pay the cost of installing all those chargers? The landlords? The same people who have to be sued regularly, just to get them to keep their properties up to bare minimum standards? Good luck with that.

Again, just because some places aren't practical (today) doesn't mean the technology is doomed. And I'd refer back to the indoor plumbing situation too. The landlord pays. And if they don't provide toilets, well, the price of rent will have to be reduced in order to compete with other places that do.

There are reasons why adoption of EVs won't be overnight, and there are reasons why it will never be 100% of the vehicle market. Given. But this kind of FUD with an opening line of "simply unworkable" borders on oil industry shill.

Comment Wikipedia editors take the rules seriously. (Score 2) 67

at a Wikipedia conference ... two volunteer editors tackled an armed man who stormed the stage and threatened to kill himself

You're not allow to edit your own page.

On Wikipedia, you're not allowed to edit articles about yourself ...

(Happy everyone is okay and hope he gets some help.)

Comment Re:Fine by me (Score 1) 66

I have a Ring doorbell and several cameras and can't understand why I wouldn't want the police to access the footage.

Imagine this.
You have a daughter. She has the (unwanted) attention of an officer. He is using your footage and the footage of others to track her whereabouts. Don't worry. He won't do anything to her because she's got a new boyfriend. Probably.

Imagine this.
There have been cars broken into and vandalized in your area. Some happens on a night when you went for a walk. An ambitious officer finds your footage showing you coming and going, and either doesn't find or doesn't look for any further footage. You are now a/the suspect. You know you are innocent but other circumstantial evidence may convince them otherwise. Bonus if you are black.

These aren't absurd. Things like them happen every day and while they may not happen to you, anyone having access to footage without asking permission from its owner has the potential for abuse.

Personally I'm 100% okay with the idea that camera owners can easily register theirs and a location so law-enforcement can request footage, and 99 times out of 100 I'd hand it over, but that 1 in 100 leftover... not a good idea.

Comment Re:Love the comments (Score 2) 147

One thing about coffee taste is temperature. If you fill 6 little plastic cups with an ounce or two of liquid and then sip through them, the temperature of the first one is much higher than the temperature of the last one. Did they control for temperature? Did they control order of tasting?

Maybe this is just a flawed study.

Also, (a) many of the aromatic compounds in coffee are volatile and evaporate relatively quickly; which is why brewing into a (basically) sealed carafe is better than into an open pot; and (b) there are chemical processes that degrade the flavor of coffee that start just after brewing, which can't be mitigated. It's unclear if sampling re-constituting freeze-dried coffee vs sampling a series of cups of recently brewed coffee is comparable - even noting that some of the noted processes may have occurred before freeze-drying.

This was an interesting edition of NPR Science Friday: Pouring Over The Science Of Coffee (April 2013)

Submission + - Scientists Create New Form of Ice - Ice XXI - Super Compressed at Room Temp (popularmechanics.com)

fahrbot-bot writes: Popular Mechanics is reporting on a new study published in the journal Nature Materials, where scientists from the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) have now found yet another phase, appropriately named Ice XXI. At the heart of the experiment, scientists used diamond anvil cells (DACs)—a common device used in materials science for squeezing samples under immense pressure—to subject water to 2 gigapascals (20,000 times higher than normal atmosphere) of pressure in just 10 milliseconds.

The scientists call this kind of water “supercompressed,” and it’s metastable, meaning it persists for a time even when another form of ice would be more stable. And because of the immense pressure, ice forms at room temperature but the molecules are much more densely packed.

“Rapid compression of water allows it to remain liquid up to higher pressures, where it should have already crystallized to ice VI,” Geun Woo Lee, a co-author of the study from RISS, said.

Comment Really prevents sharing internet (Score 1) 45

In a lot of apartment complexes, the physical proximity of tenants make sharing internet trivially easy. Just ask a neighboring unit (or one directly above / below) if they want to split internet costs with you, and you split the bill. Or if you're really smart, have two neighbors "split" the bill with you 50/50 each and they are paying for the internet.

If everyone's internet cost is already included in their rent then obviously this isn't an option. Or folks who just use the internet on their phone over cellular and don't even need WiFi at all.

Comment Re:Really should be honoring Woz Instead! (Score 1) 77

(E) PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS. "No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design of any coin issued under this subsection.

And then there's this: $1 Trump coin draft is ‘real,’ US Treasurer says (article includes a mock-up, with his "fight fight fight" pose on the reverse)

A portrait of President Donald Trump may be featured on a commemorative $1 coin issued by the United States Mint in honor of America’s 250th birthday in 2026, according to first drafts of the images confirmed by the US Treasury.

Apparently, they're looking for loopholes or other ways to circumvent the statue you cited. (sigh)

The side portrait of Trump is featured on the front side of the coin, not the reverse, appearing to get around the law. The reverse still features Trump, but it’s unclear if the image would be a violation of the law. The reverse side still features Trump, but the Butler image falls outside of the direct language “head and shoulders portrait or bust.”

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -- Publius Syrus

Working...