Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yes, mods here (Score 1) 68

100% agree.

I believe that in Slashdot's current moderation system (with scores capped to five, and the content of comments being outright unavailable on mobile if the scores fall too low) moderators' identities (that is, their made-up slashdot ones, not their actual identities) should be public. You should be able to see who is responsible for which mods.

This is not as good as a proper web-of-trust system where e.g. your chosen Slashdot poster relationships would affect how moderation was applied to comments, which IMO would also make it unnecessary to see who modded what and how. But at least it would let you make informed decisions. Sure you can adjust comment scores based on those relationships, but you cannot affect the effects of moderation that way, and that's what's really wanted to make moderation effective and useful — The only way in which I care what my foes or freaks think about a comment is that if they think it's bad, I want to read it — which is the opposite of what Slashdot moderation does.

Comment Re:This isn't really a surprise (Score 1) 68

I think its equally likely that its privately funded by wealthy elites that do it to keep the masses fighting with each other.

That's the same thing, though.

This seems to be an issue that transcends national interests and specific borders

Yes, absolutely, that's how Trump can be working with foreign dictators with whom he has nothing else in common but money* and power.

* Yeah, it looks a lot like Trump was worse than broke (in a shitload of debt, that is) before he became president again and leveraged that to collect bribes. But he still had enough money in his little hands, even if it wasn't actually his, for that to still make sense.

Comment No. (Score 2) 68

No, they aren't.

First, it's not ruined. There's lots of cesspools, but there's lots of good out there too. Also, while we all get a bunch of shit presented to us, you also attract what you put out, and what you go looking for. The algorithms make sure of that. You get more of what you interact with.

Second, it's not a few people. It's the majority of people ruining the internet. Eternal September proves this. The masses of dumbshits have a multiplying effect on scum content. They interact with it, making sure everyone sees more of it. They even repost it in the name of mocking it, likewise.

Comment Re: Lifetime has a special meaning (Score 1) 52

DVD ROM wasn't in use by the time the TLS (not deprecated SSL) and HSTS deployment of the Internet became fully comprehensive

Did you miss the point that we're talking about the FBI? Government still does a ton of shit by fax. (e.g. see the bottom header on this page.) You clearly just don't have any idea how poorly any of this shit is run at all, or how resistant to change government is.

Comment Re: Lifetime has a special meaning (Score 1) 52

Aside from the enormous expense of packet capture and storing (1tb a month on my connection, costing a couple hundred in storage for the provider) making your statement completely unrealistic, what use is encrypted traffic packet captures to law enforcement? In my experience I've never seen that done

Your experience is worthless, because it definitely happens. I have a friend who worked for an ISP in Santa Cruz who was required to not only capture traffic for several customers, but also provide it to the FBI on DVD-ROM. I would hope they use something else now. This was well after everything went SSL.

Comment Re: My 2011 mac mini is now running Ubuntu (Score 1) 20

Yes, for that purpose there are any number of Chinese mini PCs you could use that would do the job at least as well. I just ordered a slightly older machine with a 5825U, 32GB of dual channel memory, and a 1TB nVME SSD for under $300. It has the same architecture as my primary desktop (Zen 3) so it will be convenient, I can reuse binaries even if I build them for this architecture specifically, and only need one set of compilers for distcc. The SoC TDP is 15W. It's under $600 for a more modern system but power consumption is very important for my specific use case (it's meant to be the PC in an RV and sip power from the solar equipment) so I went with this older chip. The newer one is only about 40% more powerful for three times the consumption...

Slashdot Top Deals

Parts that positively cannot be assembled in improper order will be.

Working...