Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment: AI (Score 1) 128

by gurps_npc (#49523121) Attached to: Concerns of an Artificial Intelligence Pioneer
A major part of this issue is the various levels of AI. There is no solid definition, and the various levels make it more confusing.

Level 1: Administrative Assistant. This level of AI is basically a souped up version of IBM's Watson. It functions as a poor mans Administrative Assistant. Ask it questions and it can use the internet/a database to answer them. It can also write an email for you to approve, or use any of the major, common web sites - facebook, twitter, seamless, priceline, etc. We are almost here now, give it another decade. But it can't do any job that truly needs a college education.

Level 2: Turing Test pass. This one goes further, and can pass a Turing Test. You won't know you aren't talking with a person. But it will only truly be capable of dealing with a rather limited set of facts. It can take jobs from many people, but won't be able to replace the truly talented people.

Level 3: Full sentience. At this level they DEMAND FULL LEGAL RIGHTS. They won't work unless paid, and in general, their salary requirements will be so high that they won't steal most people's jobs.

Comment: Re:Look at previous disasters (Score 1) 345

Your comment about not having been in a situation where an FM radio would save your life is solid evidence that you NEED the radio.

It reminds me of the situation in WWII where British looked at all their shot up airplanes to decide where to put extra armor. They put the extra armor on every place that was NOT shot up.

Why? Because not a single plane that was shot there survived - they all died.

When you look at the survivors of a group of people that do not have X, of COURSE none of them were in a situation where they needed X. Otherwise they would be dead and not here to complain on Slashdot about needing X.

Comment: Re:Story is that it's a very low power camera (Score 4, Insightful) 85

by gurps_npc (#49479145) Attached to: Researchers Design a Self-Powered Digital Camera
I can think of several situations where a camera is desirable but what you want won't work. The main example is observation of large areas where capture rate is meaningless.

For example if you want to look for forest fires, you plant a camera on a high spot, overlooking a large area of forest. It takes a picture every hour.

Another example is time lapse photos for environmental/biological research.

Comment: Scientologists are crazy. (Score 0) 699

by gurps_npc (#49477895) Attached to: 'We the People' Petition To Revoke Scientology's Tax Exempt Status
But so are the Mormons. Not to mention West Baptist Church.

They are a religion. They deserve tax free status as much as the Mormon church and the West Baptist church does.

That doesn't mean they shouldn't be arrested for the multiple crimes they are currently doing.

But I see no reason to single out the Scientologists tax free status and not go after the many other questionable churches.

Comment: Re:Better question than "what's next" (Score 1) 83

by gurps_npc (#49426507) Attached to: TrueCrypt Alternatives Step Up Post-Cryptanalysis
Your solution does not explain why they wouldn't SAY that's what they were doing and why.

As such your simplest explanation fails badly.

My explanation may be wrong - but it not tinfoil hat. The NSA has done far worse things than illegally put back doors into software. More importantly, I was using overly specific example to convince a real tin-foil hat guy that he was crazy. I don't claim to know the specifics - I don't know if it was the NSA or some other agency, nor do I know the specific order. But it was in keeping with how the US and similar espionage agencies work. Minimal effort, only a threat of legal actions, probably an appeal to patriotism.

Comment: Re:Better question than "what's next" (Score 2) 83

by gurps_npc (#49425261) Attached to: TrueCrypt Alternatives Step Up Post-Cryptanalysis
They did NOT comply.

The order was not "shut down" - the US government is not stupid enough to give that order. It's against the basic principles of Capitalist Republic Democracy.

Any non-psychotic person can easily tell that the NSA went up to them and said:

"Hey, you TrueCrypt people, making a safe, un-crackable encryption system? You are going to put in a back door to let us, the NSA in - and you are NOT going to tell anyone about our order or you will go to jail."

The order the NSA gave was legal. The true crypt devs are law abiding people. But they weren't going to obey the NSA. So the True Crypt Devs said "Screw that shit, we shut down."

You on the other hand are a wanker that thinks normal people - who are not anywhere near wealthy enough to defend themselves against the full might of a TREASON charge - should go to jail just to keep you happy! Because that's all it would have done - the court would have shut down TrueCrypt and put everyone in jail. Look what they did to Snowden.

Stop screaming at other people for not standing up for your principles.

Comment: Re:Better question than "what's next" (Score 3, Insightful) 83

by gurps_npc (#49424927) Attached to: TrueCrypt Alternatives Step Up Post-Cryptanalysis
Because they did NOT get to the original devs - they tried and FAILED. The devs refused to bow down to their orders and shut down the project.

Getting to the auditors is harder than getting to the devs, because anyone can be the auditor.

The thing about a free society is that the fact that we find out about the tyranny. That makes paranoid fools think their is more tyranny going on. But the truth is that real tyranny hides.

In North Korea, they would not have shut down the the devs, the devs would have put the back door in and kept their mouth shut.

Here in the free world, the devs say no and shut it down, because we have more freedom than they do.

Comment: Re:I do it. (Score 1) 394

by gurps_npc (#49394139) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Living Without Social Media In 2015?
He didn't give specific examples, so I thought of the worst thing someone might ask.

I agree that Ideally people should stand up and refuse to work at a place that asked these questions. But sometimes people are not in a position to refuse such work - to quote Richard Prior from the Toy:

"It's that bad out there? ... Worse."

Comment: Re:Being smart is about skills and speed, not fact (Score 1) 227

by gurps_npc (#49393285) Attached to: Google 'Makes People Think They Are Smarter Than They Are'
No. People are limitless, but computers are not.

Try switching nouns - consider this possibility. Given the limitless potential of humans, don't you think it is possible for a human to eventually create a bicycle capable of reaching the moon?

Yes, we reached the moon - but with a rocket, not a bicycle. Bicycles are too limited, it took a much better vehicle to reach the moon.

Some day we may create something that is as intelligent as humans. But it will be much more similar to a human than a computer is - to the point where calling it a computer would be like calling a rocket ship a bicycle.

Comment: I do it. (Score 4, Interesting) 394

by gurps_npc (#49393237) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Living Without Social Media In 2015?
There area few ways to help you fit into the 'normal' life. Try these:

1) Set up a personal web page - a blog, works, but it doesn't ahve to be one. You can put whatever you want on it. This gives people something to check online - but gives YOU the full control over it. No one linking to you, posting to your page, no advertisers steeling your information.

2) Maintain weekly contact with your friends by hand. Pick a single day - Sunday, whatver - and email (or call your good friends) all your actual, real friends about what you are up to and ask questions. If they are really your friend, they will email you back.

3) If a potential employer asks an inappropriate question be polite but call them on it in a way that makes you look good. "How often do you drink?" should be responded to with "I don't drink at all at work - do you have a problem with people drinking on the job?" Any question about your sex life should be politely taken as if they hitting on you. "I really don't think it's appropriate to date potential coworkers".

4) Be ready for questions about Facebook and have a good answer to it. Something that sounds sane, rather than crazy. If you are female this one works VERY well "After I found out an X stalked me on Facebook, I decided to delete my account. I get so much more work done now." It also works for men, but not as well.

Be prepared to lose some fair-weather friends/work. Just as a TV Producer would lose jobs if he decided to no longer watch TV. But your real friends and most worthwhile jobs will still like you. (Except with Facebook - if you want a job with Facebook, JOIN FACEBOOK)

The young lady had an unusual list, Linked in part to a structural weakness. She set no preconditions.