Comment Could be worse. (Score 1) 40
If it was in Fahrenheit it would a 3.6 degrees of warming, so another reason to switch to the Metric System: it'll be cooler.
If it was in Fahrenheit it would a 3.6 degrees of warming, so another reason to switch to the Metric System: it'll be cooler.
Then maybe don't become a teacher.
Or run for House / Senate.
Seven has always been a troublemaker, starting when it ate nine.
It's nice to see both conservative and left wing news networks on the list of non signatories as this shouldn't be a partisan issue.
Agreed.
Everyone should care about freedom of the press and government transparency.
Especially the guy whose oath is literally to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States". Didn't Trump repeatedly promise to be "the most transparent President" and have "the most transparent administration" in history? Maybe he and his minions were frightened off by the word "trans"
Given ethics and mandates of journalism, I would argue that signing such an agreement makes the information no longer news. So they have to choose, do news or do PR.
Noting that OAN (One America News Network) signed it. From US news outlets reject Pentagon press access policy
Reuters is among the outlets that have refused to sign, citing the threat posed to press freedoms. Others that have announced their refusal to accept the new press access rules in statements or their own news stories are: the Associated Press, Bloomberg News, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, CNN, Fox News, CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, Axios, Politico, The Guardian, The Atlantic, The Hill, Newsmax, Breaking Defense and Task & Purpose.
Conservative cable news outlet One America News signed on to the new policy.
"After thorough review of the revised press policy by our attorney, OAN staff has signed the document," Charles Herring, the president of OAN parent company Herring Networks, said in a statement. Reuters could not immediately ascertain if other organizations had also signed it.
The Pentagon has apparently backtracked a bit, saying organizations don't have to agree, just acknowledge they understand it. Not sure that's any better...
Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement on Monday: "The policy does not ask for them to agree, just to acknowledge that they understand what our policy is.
"We want to give users a chance to use the advancements that have happened in generative AI to create a ChatGPT moment for themselves, but on TV."
The genesis of many, many bad ideas: ", but on
(Pretty sure the first part of that quote is dumb too.)
I've been hosting my open-source projects on Github for years.
Why you ask? After all, isn't every open-source and free software advocate's duty to stay clear away from Microsoft?
Here's my reason: I only use the git part of Github. I don't use any of Microsoft's proprietary crap on top of it.
Therefore, Microsoft has no vendor lock-in on me: my projects are one git-push away from being hosted elsewhere. I waste their resources by making them host my massive files for free and they have absolutely nothing to show for it - no revenue, no private data to monetize, nothing.
But the minute Microsoft starts getting annoying, my repos are gone. I'll move them to Codeberg and I will gladly pay for the hosting in the form of donations.
When you have 32 kilobytes of RAM and a 1 MHz processor, you need all the programming talent you can get to squeeze the most performances out of them.
When you have 32 gigabytes and dozens of cores, any incompetent code monkey can churn out the same application in Visual Basic or Python.
Resources don't make your computer faster. They empower incompetent and sloppy developers, who crucially are paid less than good ones, so their boss can make more money.
I remember in the last 90's / early 2000's discussing with a colleague how it was possible that X allocated 2 megabytes for an empty window, just for sitting there on the screen.
tbh if all it did was chant "Remember your vows. defend the constitution" over and over again, that might end up being useful.
I'd settle for members of Congress getting that message: Oath to The Constitution, Responsibilities of Congress, Checks and Balances,
For SCOTUS, I'd add: Don't pull and misapply stuff from 400 years ago to invent justifications for your agendas. If you're an Originalist or Textualist, then be that more than just when it's convenient.
This kind of stuff makes me feel better about keeping, and spending $$ to repaint, my 2002 Honda CR-V Ex, which only has 60k miles and is in excellent mechanical condition -- and has a manual transmission, which is almost impossible to get now. Same goes for my 2001 Honda Civic Ex, with only 130k miles. As a bonus, them being only a year apart, all the interior controls are nearly identical.
Newer isn't always better.
to serve up advertisement and privacy-invadind SaaS at lightning speed. I can't wait!
People will buy anything that's one to a customer.