If you are a programmer and you are given clear instructions on what is expected, then yes. If you are a programmer and you are not given clear instructions, then no. However if you are technical lead/architect then you really should be responsible for it.

OTOH if you are a programmer and you raise these concerns then you are on your way to become a technical lead/architect.

In my systems I insist we keep a database table of various common passwords (tens of thousands of these) and we do not allow people using them as well.

They gave up their privacy when they stepped out of their front door.

I remember a story on Slashdot from around the turn of the century, an audit of servers at the Pentagon found that the most common Admin password was Password, the second-most common was P@ssw0rd.

At my first real IT job in 1996 if you knew the birthdate of of the children of 4/5 of the users you knew their password. I wasn't allowed to insist on a change in the user training.

It is like saying: someone will do some work for free, because they like it, lets then make sure that we take away the product of their work, they don't need it anyway. How is that a moral stance, how is it good economically? People feel a certain way if someone tries to steal from them. One thing is to work, even if you don't have to, but to understand that the result of your work is yours. It is a completely different proposition to enslave someone just because they can survive without keeping the results of their work. Practically speaking, if someone sees this type of attitude, they choose a different jurisdiction to do their work, where there won't be such blatant abuse.

I disagree with this approach because I am against theft. Whatever an individual can create for himself is his to do with as he desires, not anyone else. I don't understand this sentiment, is there anything in it except for envy?

My understanding is that the exports are going out under the Belt & Road Initiative, so as much as possible is done with local labor (so the opposite of IMF/World Bank programs), and local people are trained to manage it as well. This is one of several reasons why Belt & Road is replacing IMF infrastructure funding throughout the Third World, rather than having KBR come in and build facilities to support the foreign extraction industries and then abandoning the project to decay they're creating both the technical and financial underpinnings of sustainable public infrastructure. (This is not coincidentally the way Gate Foundations projects work.)

The Chinese build nuclear reactors in around six years from breaking ground to connecting to the grid. They've licensed 30 of them to be built in the last three years, and are exporting 15 more. Unfortunately we're not allowed to buy their tech.

I'm sure it will be the Baptists, they specialize in going into cultures that they don't understand and insisting that theirs is the only way to live, like this moron:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

He's the 2018 winner of the Darwin Award.
https://darwinawards.com/darwi...

You joke, but having something definitive allows researchers to work filling in the gaps. The decipherment of Linear B was accomplished only after Alice Kober figured out the coding for 'and'. Now instead of a few big long stretches of text that you don't understand you have more pieces of smaller stretches which you can compare and contrast.

I am talking about Bezos in the exact sense, that as any developed human individual, he needs to feel useful, which is what motivates him, because clearly it is not money that is his motivation. You added the 'virtuous' part, which is why you started on the path of class division. I did not prescribe a moral aspect to his behavior, only the fact that he is moved to do more than just enjoy his leisure, this has no relation to him being virtuous, this has to do with him losing himself without work.

Likely a lot more of the traffic is coming from smart TVs, vacuum cleaners, irrigation systems and the like.

They're looking at the upcoming effect on buying for the Christmas season. If Walmart's credit card processor gets DDOS'd at that scale they'd better be hosted on AWS or Azure, because Bank Of America's network sure as hell won't be able to deal with it. Amazon will be all right, but Pinconning Cheese's online store would be blown out of the water.

My daily driver is a 2002 Tacoma RWD with a five speed and the smallest 4-banger they sold, that vehicle or its equivalent is just plain not available in the US. I know damn well there's a market for it, since people keep leaving notes on it asking to buy it. I do a certain amount of remodeling and a lot of gardening and landscaping so I need a pickup. I don't need something that drives, sucks fuel, and weighs as much as a 737 MAX, but that's what manufacturers have decided that I have to buy. The 2003 Tacoma was the size of the 2002 Tundra, and it's only gotten larger and the same with Mazda. Why? Because the profit level is higher, so they can make more money from fewer vehicles. (Don't suggest something like the Santa Fe, it's a toy to carry other toys in. No one is putting a yard of manure or 1200 pounds of landscaping blocks in one.)

On the other hand, I **can** buy the vehicle that I need in Peru or Malaysia, but I'm not allowed to bring it home of course.

AI is some sort of technology, whoever develops this technology better wins something supposedly. Governments have nothing to do with this, technology doesn't belong to the governments.

we are talking about different things. You are talking about class division, all of this, I am talking about a person who does not have to work and yet he does it because he wants to, yes, but personally for him there is nothing to be gained except more headache, it is not about earning more, it is about doing something with yourself.

I am saying that doing something is an important part of living, doing something useful, where you feel useful, this is what this example shows.

Certainly, if you worked as an office cleaner most of your life, probably you will not be missing that work if you were able to get a pension and stop working, but I think you will still be missing the entire aspect of being useful in a wider sense of the word.

I think what makes us people is desire to be useful, doesn't matter how much money you make. I think people who do not have that desire are actually less than developed people.