Do capitalism's efficiency claims come close to reality?

What if conservation laws are the new "planets must orbit in circles because circles give me a perfect vibe"?

Novel respiratory infections.

Also. Second base.

(without the parents in the next room)

The problem is asymmetric. It's easier to attack than to defend. AI scripts simply helps more attackers over the steep barrier to entry of the field.

What's prompt engineering? Is that a euphemism for what a non-lazy engineer does?

....And now everyone knows how to disable the VTS and steal a working Porsche. Streisand Effect.

....blah blah....EU....blah blah....fail...blah blah.

Ah. I see what you did there!

As in any subject, unless there is a mindless hype (such as "AI" currently) finding a job with a specific degree requires you to have done well. Too many just want the paper but not the qualification that should come with it and for-profit "education" makes it easy to do so. Then they are surprised they have problems finding a job ...

Obviously. But those that "can hack it" are still going into non-vacuous subjects, not into "AI". And "AI and Cybersecurity"? How utterly stupid are these people? AI helps attackers, not defenders. AI may make defense harder though, because AI generated code is riddled with vulnerabilities. (Yes, I am aware there is more AI than LLMs...)

With the other half being of negative worth? Color me non-surprised.

I will be interested when they have a working prototype that comes close to the claimed efficiency. I predict that will not happen.

What if they hedge by shorting AI even as they major in it?

Are you saying major in finance?

Why were neural nets alone unable to do context-sensitive natural language? Is the attention mechanism which is not a neural net the real paradigm shift?

Why do serious people end up working for clowns on things like making screens jump around?