Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: You know what's also too complex? (Score 1) 649

by cloud.pt (#49518427) Attached to: Automakers To Gearheads: Stop Repairing Cars
My freedom. My right to do whatever the f*ck I want, with me and what's mine, is, and always has been, "too complex and dangerous" to handle, be it by a private company, lobby group, or even a government. My right to be human is not a commodity you can meddle with. It just happens to collide with your business model, and to that I suggest you change it, instead of changing me.

Comment: This shouldn't be regarded as a boycott (Score 3, Insightful) 190

by cloud.pt (#49509537) Attached to: Assange Talk Spurs UK Judges To Boycott Legal Conference
Anyone with the least grasp of what a conflict of interest is, should know that, whatever the opinion of those judges, they did the professional thing to do: left a colloquial event in order to prevent influence of informal statements from a very likely candidate to be heard in their courts. Simple as that

Comment: This is a capitalist world we live in. Accept it (Score 1) 179

by cloud.pt (#49492665) Attached to: Cyanogen Partners With Microsoft To Replace Google Apps

"Rather than distribute more proprietary services,"... Do not confuse CyanogenMod (CM) with Cyanogen Inc.. The later is a 1B$ valuated company, not an NPO. CM is to Inc. much what AOSP stands for Android: an open-source project backed by a for-profit organization that takes the helm.

Android itself is nothing more than a Google certified AOSP+GApps package. Gapps (market, big data collection, and so on) and OEM support/certification is the way Google monetizes the free AOSP. If Cyanogen Inc. is to succeed as a company, they must have a proven Mobile market exit strategy that should be similar to this. That strategy can be good, bad, or so-so for the stereotypical user:

  1. If Cyanogen Inc. decides to collaborate with Microsoft in ways that the Microsoft services are provided with low to no strings attached, and under some form of source openness, there is a clear benefit to the user, and Microsoft will certainly benefit from AOSP divergence in the market in favour of Windows Mobile (so there should be small financial incentive flow to Cyanogen Inc.).
  2. If CM starts dropping Gapps integration in favour of focusing efforts on an "MSApps" solution, that is a clear step back but it will probably provide more financial incentives to both parties, since Microsoft will totally hijack Google's model.

I predict a third option (the so-so one) is what's cooking, as Microsoft/Cyanogen Inc both need to take a stand for their financial goals, yet Inc surely wants to steer clear from total dependency on a third-party, and keep up their FOSS/XDA-community driven popularity - they are, after all, the ones who freely do all the heavy lifting on CM, and Cyanogen Inc, much like a RedHat or an Oracle, is reaping gains from an open environment needing professional supervision. They would be shooting themselves in the foot otherwise.

Comment: You missed the point (Score 1) 200

by cloud.pt (#49423089) Attached to: Snowden Demystified: Can the Government See My Junk?

The fact John Oliver seemed a bit biased against Snowden's "method of delivery", and the complexity of the information he decided to make public being out of his "jurisdiction", were clearly outbalanced by his concise, honest and morally sound answers. Snowden proved in more than enough ways his intentions were good, and the only place where it's still up for debate if the consequences paid off is in closed-minded, nationalist-following individual opinion.

And criticizing the childish tone the conversation took afterwards... Well I can only guess you grew a tolerance to comedy. Or maybe I didn't get the memo that satire is démodé. It's not about fueling anything to the bottom: awareness only comes from public interest, and public interest only comes from mindless, charismatic acceptance, especially when the environment lends a helping hand ("your rights online" is a slashdot section these days after all, up there with science) . That's the reason a certain mustachio-bearing douche started WW2, and the same reason Mandela killed the apartheid. Double-edges my friend, you have to abuse them. Comedy works that way and so does all media/political influence. Good or bad.

Comment: Re:That's cool and all... (Score 1) 265

There's a reason me and the original article used percentages instead of gross values: they actually mean something. You would have made an amazing point if normalization wasn't a factor in ANY statistical comparison... What you said is pretty much like comparing the amount of food in weight an ant (body weight: 1-5mg) and a lion (body weight: 120-250kg) consume throughout their life spans. You just used gross energy output to compare a 10M people country to a 40M people state.

"Sounds like what we need to do in CA is to stop being so power hungry.." - yeah, because that MacBook's power efficiency must be the real problem... Or your fridge's A+ rating not being as good as A+++. Single individuals won't change their behavior patterns to suit electric consumption, at least not to a level it has much effect. And you should know better: going back to the stone age isn't progress. What you would make up in saved energy you lose in scientific, cultural, and financial development.

But in your defense, that pattern of confusing people through big gross numbers is a tactic often used by politicians and bankers to fool the common folk, and I see a reason why you would feel compelled to use such arguments (because you're so used to being fooled by them). In this case you would best let yourself use "before and after" type of pictures since those, even when mostly staged by different actors, actually have a logical reasoning that goes beyond stating words like billions or megawatts: showing IMPROVEMENTS.

Comment: That's cool and all... (Score 5, Informative) 265

Here in Portugal, my electric bill states we do at least 30% from wind sources, and overall +70% is renewable. We rarely get outages, and we have a very decent supply of fossil-fuel from North Africa. We have a lot less surface area than California (~100.000 vs 400.000 km) , and probably less sunlight time overall, considering cloudy days are like 30% of the year span. Let me know when a state gets even close to that!

Comment: The tides are changing (Score 1) 416

by cloud.pt (#49273831) Attached to: Politics Is Poisoning NASA's Ability To Do Science
Politics was once a major instigator of NASA having more funding than national health back in the cold war moon race. Who gives two flying if now other matters take priority. It's not like space, physics or science in general are going to stop. Researchers have material to study for centuries, and all they have to do is look up (or even down). If anything, they can rely on new findings from other space agencies. The US is mostly worrying with a matter of honor and space-faring tradition rather than the greater good.

Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. -- Publius Syrus

Working...