"we're paralyzed by stupidity, bigotry and an overwhelming urge to prevent anyone from having a happy life without being miserable a minimum of 40 hours a week."

As I meant to write, presuming no one can have 'a happy life without being miserable a minimum of 40 hours a week' seems to me a claim that a 40 hour a week job leaves employees universally 'miserable'.

Did I misinterpret your assertion? Please elaborate.

That's one, and it's enough.

"I do still see a lot of thought terminating cliches though"

And your post is peppered with them.

Do try to engage in critical thinking. Not theory, real thought and discernment. Among other things, not every 40 hour a week job is misery, even if your entire life is.

So you missed the part that the book/paper/presentation was authored by a woman, then?

Trump appreciates you donating him permanent space in your thoughts.

...until the punishment is terrifying.
Simple as that.

Most HR personnel are women, and some might assert this is the problem, they are the vanguard of the overwhelming feminization of workplaces.

https://www.compactmag.com/art...

"...Everything you think of as âoewokenessâ is simply an epiphenomenon of demographic feminization.

The explanatory power of this simple thesis was incredible. It really did unlock the secrets of the era we are living in. Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women were few in number until recently. ..."

She presented it a little more compactly (not a great public speaker, ngl) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Spotify is a broadcaster. You think broadcaster = radio, but the medium doesn't matter.

And broadcasting is distribution today. And that's control. No different than AM radio, them FM radio. Today you have millions of potential channels, not the two dozen or so the radio gave you.

You want to listen to more than one artist? You have to find them. Broadcasting shows them to you. And if decides what to deliver. If does so by choosing from the perpetual flood of content presented to it.

And artists never got paid well by broadcasting. And, truly, none but the very very popular artists ever do very well. The market dilutes revenue so thoroughly it's pennies for the masses.

Fair? Ha. Life isn't fair.

You don't remember newspapers, huh? The quality of humanity's information has been variable for centuries. It's the discernment that is suffering recently. And that I'm includes the process of of seeking truth, rather then confirmation.

Forbid that anyone use a sensible and understandable acronym, let it offend those who own it...

Or, if you need more prompting, just stifle. I grokked that use of the acronym immediately. I won't ever confuse it with previous uses, because I possess more than two functional neurons.

I would be surprised that the pilot could l had time to do more then try to correct the roll. Already with the stick back climbing, it's looking like they were 7-12 seconds airborne to crash. Probably never really knew what happened.

Even if it worked, you're thinking the pilot could, in 5 seconds at best, decide between attempting to climb out, finding a less lethal course to suffer the crash with minimized ground casualties, or immediately dive into the nearest obstacle to contain the damage in some way.

Nope. The flight crew may have even trusted the #3 engine failure was not real, but instrumentation failure. The roll would prove them wrong, but too late to change anything. They were already in uncontrolled flight. No recovery.

This isn't like US1549 , where they had double-digit seconds to evaluate the failures. And even then they 27 seconds to decide they could not return to any airport. This accident did not seem to last 27 seconds in total.

If this is caused by engine disassembly, we can expect inspections and both corrective and preventative actions to be mandated. What else could they do?

My, we are an aggressively stupid dipshit today.

The only thing that meaningfully matters to a cargo ship is size.
Vessels are already slow sailing to artificially constrain bandwidth and prop up rates, and have been since COVID.

Nobody on earth is trying to build FASTER cargo ships, and haven't for 50 years. Jesus Christ. If only slashdot had a "doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about" filter.

Well, no, there's no law against shipping single containers at a time either. It just means a banana costs $100,000.

We have an entire thread here where you have ecological doomsayers are telling the world's most efficient transport industry how they can do things better. Sure.

Half the size? By what math?

It can carry 5300t. That's 215x 20t containers.

The largest container ships today are in the 23000 teu range which even if we assume they can't all max out at 20t... Let's assume 10t.... Is still 230,000t or 43x larger.