Comment Re:KILL BILL (Score 1) 59
If you have a republican senator, it is time to contact them to kill this bill.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Shut up common pleb and go back to Fox News. And don't contact me again without a $1m donation.
If you have a republican senator, it is time to contact them to kill this bill.
hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Shut up common pleb and go back to Fox News. And don't contact me again without a $1m donation.
Having the ability to update something, and actively forcing the issue are two very different discussions. Just because we could in theory restrict existing WiFi doesn't mean it is practical or enforceable to do so. Try telling a consumer that a product they legally purchased and was FCC approved resulted in a fine for its use due to some moron adding a hidden rider in a law to benefit his financier.
Definitely time for a different approach. If I were them, I'd definitely build out a domestic supply fully, but I'd also seek to build shorter cables with Spain and other near neighbours.
It's just not true that renewables generate electricity when we don't need it in the UK. Windpower is pretty much all consumed, and to the extent it's not, that's because it's readily switched off in a way that expensive nuclear can't be. We have only a small amount of solar, and again, we're able to consume it all. And of course, there are other solutions to excess supply of renewables besides selling it to variable-demand industrial consumers. The most obvious is storage -- short, medium and long-duration -- which is falling in price rapidly and extends the hours of usage for renewables.
This happened with others like Apple stores.
If you steal from one author it's plagiarism; if you steal from many it's research. -- Wilson Mizner