And now we have yet another variant of ID, and this version is so vague that it isn't even clear what the point is. Sometime there may ave been a purpose at some point- and this is supposed to be a scientific hypothesis?
Now you're beginning to understand. First give it a more sciency sounding name and make up sicency sounding "theories". Then try to find some scientific facts which are hard to explain (helps to have a very big stock of them since science has the annoying habit of actually explaining interesting problems in the end).
Then finally, it helps if everyone has a different definition of ID. Then you can say:
Oh no, that's not ID, you see ID really is...
I think the idea is to make it as difficult to argue with as possible because you have to argue against a set of rapidly moving goals.