Then you are being screwed. The FSA sucks. The HSA doesn't.

I did get sick (3 days in hospital, hooked up to machines that go ping). I paid $500 out of my HSA (I'd already spent $2K that year on family health expenses) and the $2500 high deducible kicked in for the rest.

Maybe he's the mole.

>Just wait until you actually get sick. Then it will seem far less of a great deal.

No it won't. My HSA has amassed more than the deductible. The money I would have put into a low deductable plan has gone into the HSA, so it has cost me no more.

The danger period is the first 6 months where you may not have amassed more than the deductible and so you may find yourself out of pocket for up to 6 months.

ho ho ho

Details of how to do it here: http://www.lgauge.com/trains/dcc/dcc.htm

I put DCC chips in my lego trains. It only takes 10 minutes with a sharp knife and a soldering iron.

Python is compiled. It's a more effective cross platform language than Java. As TFA points out, Java brings much version baggage. A compiled python program tends to work.

We 'knew' cholesterol was bad for you until they did the intervention studies and found the opposite to be true. Unless you do the science properly, you cannot know.
You draw an implicit association between decreased reaction time and fatal crashes. Do we know that to be true? I've not notice needing fast reaction on the vast majority of my drives. Are they stating relative risk or absolute?

I smell statistical bullshit with an agenda behind it.

An 'association' is not a number that you can use to reliably infer facts. There can be confounding variables. What if people drink and drive more at night and darkness is a contributor to fatal crashes? If you don't control that variable, they you would make the wrong inference about alcohol. There are many variables to driving safety. So a decent inference would require a huge study that controlled many variables and the correlation numbers were from multivariate analysis rather than 2 variable correlations.

>why not just make it 0%
You'd have to eliminate all the bacteria in your gut to make it 0%.

Epidemiological evidence doesn't count.

>Yeah but what would the alternative be? .NET?

No. Programs.
Programs work. You write them and they run on computers.

If you're writing a thing within a thing that runs on a thing within another thing, then you're writing Java, not a program.

If it's T2DM then there is a cure.
If it's T1, you're fucked.

Yes. The only thing that is different is that the SSD and drive is not separable.

I would not choose this product. I choose mirrored rotating disks and one SSD cache.

>You're getting the worst of both worlds then.

No. With SSD caching you get all the capacity of rotating disks with > 80% of the speed of SSDs.
That is not the worst of boths worlds. It is the best of one and most of the other.