apple will take 30% of the bill

game play disruption after the game is over? so you are opening the door to rule sharking where players who have lost can call some very small thing that does not matter and change that loss into an win?

Now do e-sports / other games need some kind of union to fight over powered judges / push for more fair rules?

By rule when is a game over? and to give some an DQ for something after they have won and is not like they cheated the game.
Like after you win they get to you for running back to the scores station should that really let the other player win?

do remove an superbowl win for spiking the ball after and game wining TD?

Put an tilt bob on it with 2-3 Warnings before tilt

Security camera like we need an system with apples storage markup unless it's for homes and linked to an online service.
But I don't see apple makeing an multi cam system that will be priced good as that does not really need high speed flash at priced at $400/TB

I have not even seen a standard telephone in at least 20 years. But difficulty using something patented by someone who was anti-deaf-people would be a point in favor of my argument that the suffering comes from hearing people being discriminatory and exclusionary, not against it.

They suffer from getting surprised by things a hearing person would hear coming long before ...

Arguable, some deaf people have enhanced other senses, and I am frequently surprised by things I should have heard...

Or get an extreme example: neighbours are looking strange at them, because they are loud in bed, and do not notice themselves.

Some deaf people can feel when they are making sounds. But either way, any suffering from that is not caused by being born deaf, it is caused by a social stigma about being loud in bed.

A guy shouting at you: "damn idiot, can you not move out of the way, are you deaf??!!"

Not having to hear such a person seems like a benefit to me.

somebody born deaf will never be able to enjoy Beethoven's Ode to Joy

There are ways to enjoy music other than hearing it. Beethoven is an ironic example since he went deaf (though I don't know enough about him to know if Ode to Joy was composed before or after that).
But, I understand your overall point. However, there are aspects to life that a deaf person experiences, that hearing people do not. To by default choose to deny your child the chance to experience life THAT way, assumes that hearing life is the best life. Many deaf people would argue against that.
I don't know what the right choice is, nor what choice I would make for my child in that position.

I can see how being born hearing and then going deaf causes suffering, but I don't see how being born deaf does. Seems to me that the suffering there comes from hearing people being discriminatory and exclusionary. Your attitude is part of the problem.

in the usa they may have no case for something like that under the 1st

call him to the stand

Disallow trading / betting for voteing and for war!

subjective matter jurisdiction is this an civilian or military court