It's amusing when two social scientist, neither of who understand basic statistics, get into a pissing contest.

What's not amusing is they decide who 'won' the argument by polling their coworkers feelings.

Lets show who ran the house on the same graph!

There are no Keynesians!

If they had used a Saratoga (or any of it's sisters) it would have continued on in a straight line, leaving plastic parts in it's wake.

They were banned from demolition derby, because the metal they were made of was only technically sheet metal (should have been called plate).

Also the BelAir was an empty shell. No motor, no trans. Agenda driven testing.

Especially considering that ADA is a DOD language. So you have to code in triplicate.

You also appear to want to group neurologists (scientists) in with psychologists (not scientists).

You ether don't know any psychology majors or are one yourself.

Of course the average nut job doesn't go to medical school, then specialize in psychiatry.

Which isn't to say that psychiatrists aren't also loons.

Must suck for the few that are actually trying to do science. Not so much for the 99% pushing a agenda and faking it.

It's hard to do social science right and it has a danger of upsetting your world view. So nobody does.

Do all the people that study liver disease have fucked up livers?

If no then they are not the same. Psych majors are _all_ batshit insane.

The bible was last edited by the council of Nicea in about 250AD. It gets re-translated regularly. Look at the various translations of 1st Timothy 2:12 for how politics can affect that. Who decided to remove 'she should be quite'?

By your standard, that makes the bible about 1/10 as reliable as the Hindu books about flying elephants having battles.

The researchers. Seriously.

Crazy people major in psych because they are trying to figure out their own psychosis.

Keep hoping. Also remember there are no Keynesians. Keynes would run a surplus in good times. 'Keynesians' are just 'print and spenders' with 'intellectual' cover circle jerking.

Sounds an awful lot like that other "soft science", Economics. Some researchers are finally getting away from the 'revealed wisdom' of Friedman and company, and hopefully Chicago School Economics will soon end up in the dust bin of history with phrenology and vital humors.

I grew up a few blocks from a large mental institution, and many of my classmates' parents worked there. An awful lot of the people who worked there ended up loonier than their patients.

I'm still drinking good Brazilian rum I got for less then $1/750 ml when their reds wrecked the real. Not a big rum drinker, I'll leave the last of it to my heirs.

Think of the opportunity.