Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
AMD

AMD's Open Source Linux Driver Trounces NVIDIA's 147

Posted by timothy
from the hari-seldon dept.
An anonymous reader writes "In a 15-way graphics card comparison on Linux of both the open and closed-source drivers, it was found that the open-source AMD Linux graphics driver is much faster than the open-source NVIDIA driver on Ubuntu 13.04. The open-source NVIDIA driver is developed entirely by the community via reverse-engineering, but for Linux desktop users, is this enough? The big issue for the open-source 'Nouveau' driver is that it doesn't yet fully support re-clocking the graphics processor so that the hardware can actually run at its rated speeds. With the closed-source AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce results, the drivers were substantially faster than their respective open-source driver. Between NVIDIA and AMD on Linux, the NVIDIA closed-source driver was generally doing better than AMD Catalyst."

Comment: Re:HTML isn't anymore (Score 5, Funny) 302

by telchine (#43537097) Attached to: Stop Standardizing HTML

HTML needs an active companion language, an actual programming language, one that will replace the disparate third-party technologies in use today. Just eliminating Flash and Javascript for example would eliminate a vast majority of the world's browsing headaches.

I agree!

I shall call this new language "Jscript"!

-Bill

Comment: Re:A quick death from a dying market. (Score 3, Informative) 202

by telchine (#43499593) Attached to: IBM In Talks To Sell x86 Server Business To Lenovo

A quick buck, or a quick death in a dying market?

Well said! IBM might not be the giants they once were but they're still pretty clued up. They sold off Thinkpad to Leveno and it's pretty clear now that the PC* market is dying.

The server market may well be about to choke it with cloud servers becoming so popular (AWS and whatnort). It doesn't seem sensible for a company of IBM's size to hold on to a market that is fast becoming a niece market.

--
*I use "PC market" to mean "desktop/laptop market"... I hate it how Apple commandeered the term PC as if it somehow doesn't apply to Macs

Comment: Re:Year of the Linux Desktop? (Score 4, Interesting) 310

by telchine (#43337599) Attached to: Valve Starts Publishing Packages For Its Own Linux Distribution

Maybe not the year of the Linux desktop, but instead the year of the Linux set-top-box.

As long as Valve (and ideally other developers as well) make big-name games availale, then I think a lot of gamers would switch to Linux on their existing computer rather than buy a set-top box.

Plenty of people only use their computers for basic web/email/word processing and games and the only thing that ties them to Windows is games. I'm sure plenty would welcome the opportunity to not have to pay for Windows (or have the hassle of pirating it) so long as the games they want to play are available on Linux.

Unfortunately, right now, the choice is lacking. I see Counter-Strike:Source and Team Fortress 2 being the only big-name games. This is disappointing as they were allegedly beta testing with Left 4 Dead 2 which still isn't available on Linux.

Once the other main Source games become available and new games are written with Linux in mind then I can see adoption of Linux for gaming picking up.

"A dirty mind is a joy forever." -- Randy Kunkee

Working...