Comment Re:Let's Be Honest (Score 1) 99
Is that why the private sector created some $76 trillion in 2013, according to the BIS? To keep it scarce for everyone but themselves?
Is that why the private sector created some $76 trillion in 2013, according to the BIS? To keep it scarce for everyone but themselves?
I imagine the DOD would be a little peeved if it turned up in a Chinese shipyard.
We've probably outsourced worse( at least assuming that any more modernized systems, ECM, radar, etc. are stripped from the hulk first); but yeah, I'm guessing that the breakers offering the best rates don't exactly have security clearances, in addition to their atrocious environmental record, nonexistent occupational safety, and so on.
I don't actually know, and so would be interested to, is there anything considered 'sensitive' about something as old as a (presumably modernized here and there) Forrestal class? I assume that, for economic as well as security reasons, you'd rip out all the modern electronics, CIWS, radar, air-traffic-control systems, etc.; but is the remainder of the ship itself still considered a bit touchy, or old news?
The artificial scarcity of money is the chief factor holding us back from a post-scarcity society. We don't have a production capacity problem.
Yeah but now you can pay out the ass for a 3d printer and download a wrench and wait 4 hours to get your wrench.
I'd be the first to make snide comments about some of the 3d printing hype (some of it, the sort that fails to answer "and we wouldn't do this with machine tools why exactly?", there are a number of genuinely impressive applications, albeit mostly involve additional finishing steps or the really expensive printers); but 'earth orbit' is one of those places where I can imagine being willing to wait for printing rather than ordering from harbor freight and waiting for shipping.
A problem better solved by standardizing fasteners, of course; but if somebody has already opened that can of worms for you, and you need an oddball tool in a space and shipping constrained environment, I can think of worse fates than using a plastic one.
But it's an iPad Mini 2. I suppose it's a good deal as a gift for grandma.
What is the value of being able to control your own OS?
Keep board games handy. Everyone can play and interact like a real family and your kids won't end up as pedos on 8chan.
These "hackers" just made Christmas a lot less Merry for many children that just got some nice new Christmas presents.
Screw 'em. Take a day off gaming. If they can't find something else fun to do besides play on their XboxOne or PS4 for one single Christmas Day, then you've been a shitty parent. Next thing you know they're gonna start talking about ethics in game journalism and SJWs and then you have to drown them.
Better they learn now that not all gratification is instant, and an online first-person shooter whenever you want it is not a basic human right.
You'll thank me later.
Well, I don't know about that, but at least it was better than Oculus Rift, if images in TFA are anything to go by. Something like semi-spherical 320 by 240 degrees with 3D zone of maybe 120 by 240 degrees in the middle, or thereabouts.
20/20 vision is defined as the ability to distinguish a line pair separated by 1 arc-minute. So at 2 pixels per minute, your 320x240 degree angle of view translates into 38,400 x 28,800 pixels.
The human eye gets away with it because only a tiny amount of the center of your vision has that resolution. The rest is a blurry, indistinct mess. Alas, Oculus Rift does not know where in that 320x240 degree field you are looking at so it can't take advantage of this fact. In the future, maybe we'll have head-mounted projector displays which track where your eyes are looking, and project a high-resolution image only at that spot, while the rest of the field is projected at low-resolution. It would certainly reduce the burden on 3D graphics hardware.
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android