* including 3D printing,
Nope. wont change my life or work. For the things I am involved in it is either too expensive, or already relevant.

* embedded systems
Nope. changed my life already. I saw how the analog chips which we used in the end of the 90s for signal processing became obsolete and unavailable/expensive (-> Burr Brown being bough by TI) Not a new tech at all.

* and evolving Web APIs
Oh yeah, because that going to mache such a big difference

Being a web programmer is the same as brein able to enter University?

I mean dont get me wrong, i appreciate people who early in their life know what to to and do that well, even if there is is no academic education involved.

But somehow i dount that such people will be the main participants in such "bootcamps".

Why should a radio link have higher latency than a fiber?

Fascist? Nope.

Your Employer provides with tools and guidelines. if something is not explicitly allowed, then it is your responsibility to check if it is according to the rules of the company. Giving up the control over data usually is not acceptable.

If you use tools which essentially give up the control over the data to any third party (as you do in evernote), possibly even with terms and conditions which have zero accountability of the service provider, just because you like a service because it is "practical and free".

These "practical and free" services would be where i as attacker would start targeted attacks.

And that is a direct lie. One often heard from systemd advocates though. Just as if it comes from some sort of play-book.

There is a difference between "attacks" and valid criticism. Calling everybody that criticizes systemd and its adoption into Debian a "troll" or an "attacker" is unfounded and represents an extreme form of trolling itself. One could get the rather strong impression that the systemd advocates do not want any dialog or have sufficient valid arguments to deal with the criticism voiced. Instead they revert to this form of primitive emotional manipulation.

Fail...

AMD produces CPUs in Dresden, Memory and chipsets are fully produced outside the US, ARM is British, the CPUs for china's supercomputer are made there, etc. These are global companies, sometimes non-US domestic ones, but never only US companies. You mindless patriotism blinds you to reality.

Result of your proposed move would be that the US would not get components, not the other way round.

Nonsense. The US is a technology backwater now. Even if it "regains" the larger number, it does not have the people to actually use this infrastructure efficiently, making it a meaningless stunt.

A factor of 10 is pretty meaningless in supercomputing. Software quality makes much more of a difference. Of course, politicians are not mentally equipped to understand that and instead want "the larger number" like the most stupid noob PC buyer.

The Google thing was pretty badly done by people that barely understand the subject matter or scientific process.

Fail. That is not what they say.

Unfortunately, the Google paper is mostly unusable as it has severe methodical errors and basically only shows its authors do not have a clue. What of it is usable confirms things however. (Not the only really badly researched and written paper to come out of Google either...)