well if she couldnt even pass top secret security clearance... she doesnt deserve the job either....

My question is this

So because hillary is found to be lying... i mean in the dark about her email, why are we all of a sudden asking everyone about theirs??

Is it to try and shift the topic?

Is it to actually try and get electronic document reform?

is it for nothing but gotya moments on old guys who dont understand tech?

FTFY

people need to be put in some type of containment for the mentally challenged. Starting with you though

Actually ars seemed to be one of the few places ive seen reporting the trial at hand throughout, and not making it all biased towards her. Ars was pretty nutral but the reporting made it seem as if she was a spoiled entitled brat.

fine 100K a day until the job is done

well, if you said prior to 1900 (as we are doing in the case here, but 1945) you would be correct.

it wasnt 80K civilians first of all, a large number of them were working towards supporting the war effort.

If someone hit detroit in the 40s and took out GM, would you say they took out civies? no they were building the machines of war!

which can and does happen. thanks for backing my point

only government employees have that restriction

That comment is kinda sexist

but there is nothing in there that you cannot find on your own already. there really isnt any new information here. it would be like telling me i cant write a book on snowden because of secrets...except for the secrets are already out there

war is ugly

when people try and censor stuff that is already public. We see it here, we see it with snowden (im not talking classified stuff) but if this person got the information without looking at classified materials, who do they think they are to tell him to not publish?

really? I thought you took more to lose weight!