Journal Journal: Separation of ritual and dogma 29
Do you find yourself belonging to a certain religious denomination, or finding the rituals appealing, without subscribing to their most central tenets?
Such is my experience with religion. My father is agnostic, my mother Catholic, and I spent a total of ten years in evangelical mission schools, during which my religious beliefs underwent a topsy-turvy journey, oscillating between Catholicism and Protestantism, religious fervour to apathy, bigotry to tolerance. It is quite amusing how hot-headed evangelical preachers in particular criticise modern science without understanding the least bit of it - like the dismissal of evolution as such: 'if we were descended from monkeys, then why has no monkey given birth to a human?'
It is said that most people experience a peak of religiousity at the age of seventeen, and it probably holds true in my case. My disillusionment with organised religion started when noticing that in the last mission school I went to, in Singapore, all students, regardless of religious background, were required to attend weekly sermons, with the exception of the Muslims, due to cultural sensibility. To my surprise my reaction was a slight envy - it's not fair that they could skip this drudgery while other non-Christians, specifically non-evangelicals, have to burden it - and I began questioning my beliefs; prior to that I had always thought of myself as a liberal Christian/Catholic, in that I did not believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible but accepted the idea of a Christian God.
I appreciate religions now at an intellectual, cultural level. It is the appreciation that even non-religious people could feel towards religious paintings, carried into religious rituals themselves. My favourite type of service at the moment is the Catholic Latin mass, this despite Roman Catholicism being the second-lowest scoring religion in my Belief-o-Matic test score from Beliefnet. I am likewise interested in Sufi poetry and music, as well as Tibetan Buddhist chants, without necessarily subscribing to all their beliefs.
It is quite saddening (and to be honest, maddening) talking to fanatics who refuse to countenance the possibility that other religions might be equally valid (the contention being that in such a case, all religions would be invalid), this black-and-white, all-or-nothing belief. Such a belief, alas, is not limited to the Taliban and Saudi Wahhabis; a growing number of Christians subscribe to this mindset as well.
Was Huntington correct in his prediction of citizenship being replaced as people's main identity with their religious preference? Or would most people become more accomodating of other religions as globalisation brought people of different cultures and beliefs together? From anecdotal experience, alas, both seem to be happening simultaneously; I know Christian evangelicals going on missions in Peru (already a Catholic country), and Singaporean Christians having a 'Vision 2000' of converting half the country into evangelicalism, and know of Hindu and Muslim fanatics; likewise I know of moderate Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus and Jains.
What is your take on religion; could one consistently belong culturally to one religion while holding privately a different set of beliefs?
Tue May 20 Update: Found an excellent on The Atlantic Monthly on religions and civilisations: "I'm Right, You're Wrong, Go To Hell" by Bernard Lewis, an excerpt of it below:
To what extent is a religiously defined civilization compatible with pluralism--tolerance of others within the same civilization but of different religions? This crucial question points to a major distinction between two types of religion. For some religions, just as "civilization" means us, and the rest are barbarians, so "religion" means ours, and the rest are infidels. Other religions, such as Judaism and most of the religions of Asia, concede that human beings may use different religions to speak to God, as they use different languages to speak to one another. God understands them all. I know in my heart that the English language is the finest instrument the human race has ever devised to express its thoughts and feelings, but I recognize in my mind that others may feel exactly the same way about their languages, and I have no problem with that. These two approaches to religion may conveniently be denoted by the terms their critics use to condemn them--"triumphalism" and "relativism."