Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Job Openings at IBM (Score 1) 182

Wise move, IBM.

And Google. And Facebook. And Nvidia. And Apple. And everyone else.

The last few years have proven that an office presence isn't necessary for business to continue profitably.

Based on what now? Pretty much every company that can force employees back in the office without losing them is doing so.

Companies like money, and real estate is expensive. If they could get the same or better productivity having employees foot the bill for real estate they would. When it comes to money, there's no way these things happen on the whim of some "80s" thinking. Companies have armies of bean counters that evaluate this sort of thing.

Comment Re:Charging (Score 1) 382

But nobody is suggesting that, so your comment is moot. Charging stations don't spring up overnight out of nowhere, it takes time to build them. A considerable amount of money has been allocated to that end, but still they haven't magically sprung up overnight.

You sure about that?

"Biden wants all government employees to use EVs, take trains"
https://electrek.co/2023/12/15...

"Biden wants an aggressive transition to electric vehicles"
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/08...

"A purchaser of an EV is eligible for tax credits of up to $7,500"
https://thehill.com/policy/ene...

Comment Re:Charging (Score 1) 382

Well then I suppose we could also snap our fingers and convert every gas station to electric charging stations too and your imagined scenario would be moot.

I'd like to snap my fingers and have you understand the context of the article.

Politicians act like it's reasonable for everyone to just go out and replace their cars with EVs, given our current infrastructure. I'm sure there are some hillbillies out there that think the Prius is "too gay" for them, but the average person isn't "anti-EV" they just looks at the practicality of the matter.

It's painful to see people (and politicians) try to boil everything down to blue vs. red.

Comment Charging (Score 2, Interesting) 382

If we could snap our fingers and convert every has engine to electric the country would grind to a halt. Imagine if there were 100x fewer gas stations (that's generous), and it took 10x as long to fill your tank.

Get a charging station at home right? What about the huge number of people that live in apts or otherwise rent and that's not an option? If you have station at your apt, you're still going to have the nightmare of shuffling your car around with every single other person at the complex.

Guaranteed, in 15 years your EV is a junker when the batteries need replacement and it costs more than the car is worth to replace (and dispose of) them. Most gas engines wear out in that time too, but they can be rebuilt in most cases for much less.

EVs are better for the environment, but it's not like they are clean either. Mining the materials for batteries is devastating. Like oil, the raw materials for batteries are often from conflict regions. Don't like wars over oil? Do you like wars over lithium? The electricity to charge isn't brought into existence by a magical fairy. Most likely it's coming from a coal-fired plant.

Of course all of this can be improved, but we aren't there yet, and it's going to be hard.

Comment Re:Haaa Vaaaahd? (Score 1) 172

Sure buddy, and how exactly would you propose that any group of people harmed by a wealthy organization, with nearly limitless access to lawyers and judges, seek recompense?

True, but class action lawsuits benefit the corporation. They end up paying much less than they would if they had to deal with each litigant separately.

There's no good answer it's just stacked against the little guy.

Comment Re:Nice idea, but irrelevant (Score 1) 184

You starting to see how math works, when sensibly applied to real situations.

You starting to see that belittling people you're having a conversation with is counterproductive?

You didn't just have reveal some fact that nobody had thought of before. We can comprehend that the population of the earth is large, and the number of politicians traveling to Madrid is relatively small.

Such conferences are the only way that global agreements that COULD lead to significant rapid change

Oh yes, the only possible way. Huh. Zoom? It's not as good as in-person, but please, if folks actually wanted to make progress on the issues they could over video conference. The rest of the world did it for 2 years, but these folks are special where they need to travel on private jets to the most lavish metropolitan centers in the world and stay in the most posh hotels to be productive? Nope.

People don't like hypocrites. You aren't getting around that no matter how much of your "math" you throw at people.

Comment Re:Nice idea, but irrelevant (Score 2) 184

Generously assuming this conference required 3000 commercial jet flights (probably way less),
that is 3000 out of 30 million commercial flights per year, or 0.0001 of annual jet flights.

Excellent point. By that logic there's certainly no reason for me to do anything at all in my life to curb carbon emissions, because my contribution is statistically zero when looking at global emissions as a whole.

Anyway, the issue is (also) perception. When you're trying to convince Joe Blow to take the bus instead of drive, and he sees these fat cats in top hats and monocles riding around on private jets smoking cigars and drinking their brandy, it's a hard sell.

Get some perspective. Be numerate.

Never miss the chance to follow up your argument with a smart ass comment!

Comment Re:Straight outta Idiocracy. Que President Camacho (Score 0) 43

You'd need Google to be worthwhile in the first place before the circle-to-search makes sense.

And what's that got to do with the feature only being for the "literacy challenged" as you stated? You changed your argument in the middle of the discussion from "this is for stupid people" to "this is no good because google sucks".

Comment Re:Straight outta Idiocracy. Que President Camacho (Score 1) 43

It's still based on Google, who's search results are starting to suck

You've successfully invoked the "yeah but still" method to win an argument.

You: only illiterate people need this feature.
Other person: it's used for things like images.
You: Yeah but still, but Google isn't good.

Slashdot Top Deals

We gave you an atomic bomb, what do you want, mermaids? -- I. I. Rabi to the Atomic Energy Commission

Working...