Balancing that, of course: "Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein."
And the right to form a family is fundamental. Ethics is complicated.
Sort of ambivalent on the whole thing personally, but I think he refused to recant because he makes a point of not discussing his political views in public. When he made the donation, the record was between him and the state, and was only later made an open record. It seems consistent with his previous actions to refuse to discuss it. Of course, that's an approach that ended up costing him greatly. Maybe it was worth it to him. Maybe it will be the nudge that makes him introspect and change his views if he hasn't already.
There's a bit of a logical problem with assuming guilt from a refusal to make a statement, despite the human tendency to do so.
Isn't it? " (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment,
If God had not given us sticky tape, it would have been necessary to invent it.