Screaming children? That's a parent fail....
Kinda depends on whether we're talking like 5 years old or 5 months, doesn't it?
If a kid isn't even old enough to attempt to verbalize "ears hurt", they sure aren't ready to comprehend and deal with being in pain from air pressure changes.
Or if something is causing them stomach or intestinal pain, if they're young enough they know no other way to deal with it but scream.
...is Beverley Mitchell Google , and how long did it take him or her to build it?
(Beverley was originally a name for males)
And now I'm going to disagree with your characterization of this story as "...one of an ongoing number of agenda driven submissions...".
It's just a story about "who knew they used kitty litter when storing nuclear waste, much less that it has to be a specific type of kitty litter?".
Unless you're convinced that any time someone says "nuclear waste" without saying "nuclear waste, but the Cold War weapons kind, not the cute, cuddly, super-friendly power plant kind" that it's some kind of conspiracy rather than use of a generic term.
Apparently the large cargo Antanov has control systems made up of racks of gear with valves. A retired electrical transmission engineer I know (who did plenty of design work with valves in his career) was shown around inside one, and he suspected it was to deal with an EMP pulse. There's probably American stuff that is EMP hardened as well but there are solid state ways of doing it that were used by NASA before they sent the first probe near Jupiter.
When you say valves, do you mean what in the US are referred to as vacuum tubes, or are you referring to a mechanical device such as might be used in pneumatic or hydraulic control systems?
It's okay, Bartles. Just need a quick check for dyslexia and allow for it in the future.
He's not a moron, jet has a minor reading disability.
I applaud what you did there.
(and would have modded you +1, Funny, if I hadn't already made a previous comment in this thread)
You have used "obfuscate" where you should have used "conflate" in your attempt to imply that which you wish us to infer.
There's a reason we don't trust journalists to get science stories right. They allow hedlines which ignore issues like control groups.
Generally they have no control over headlines other than getting angry and resigning.
Editors write headlines.
They also determine how much of what the journalist wrote actually winds up getting printed under that headline, and perhaps even in which order.
Well, I'm sure you're much better in English than I would be in your native tongue.
Bear.
(Bare means uncovered, unclothed, naked, unaided...
"I wrestled the big brown bear with my bare hands"
although probably not for long unless the bear had been heavily drugged)
Better yet, "have no effect on who..."
Indeed.
For example, In the case of
Actually, it's the same guy submitting those same stories to those other sites under a different user name.
I believe margins per customer were in question, not net margins. The motivation behind the comment is probably "who does Google try to gouge, consumers, -business-, or industry? And who do ISPs gouge, -consumers-, business, or industry?"
Yes.
Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes