Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Just in case it wasn't crystal clear (Score 1) 405

I don't understand why Republicans stand up for him at all. He was no Republican - he was the son of one and wanted to be King but thought it was all about parties and holidays.
He saw it as a prize and not a job, and that he could hand out smaller prizes to personal friends. His terms were all about appearance and little about reality - idiocy like pulling out the military so that the CIA could get the credit for catching Bin Laden really sum up the situation. Simply because he couldn't tell his friend in charge of the CIA to pull his finger out and do their job of coordinating intelligence we got the vast barely competent organisation of Homeland Security to do it instead.
The arrival on the carrier in a clown suit designed to take the best of a dozen uniforms really sums up his time of trying to run the USA like Enron - all flash and no substance.
Don't forget that when the country needed him he simply ran away. Not even a secret broadcast from a hidden location, not even a statement or email - just running away and not doing his job. There has never been another US President that would have done that.

Comment Suite format (Score 1) 520

Four fully enclosed offices with doors which open to a central conference area (just a 3x8 table and half a dozen chairs), which in turn opens onto the corridor accessing the rest of the office. Bonus points if you can parley a space for a sink, a mini-fridge, and a coffee machine on a small kitchenette at one end of the common area.

You should always be close, but there are times when you need to collaborate and times when you need to close the door and concentrate on what you're doing without distraction (coding, of course).

I have actually worked in an environment like this and it is pretty darned productive. We had 6 offices that opened onto a common area. No coffee mess, but life isn't perfect. I think we were much more in sync as a team than the folks who were lined up in offices along a corridor, and much less distracted than being in a cube farm (I've been in both of those environments, too).

Comment Re:British tax returns are due in in January (Score 2, Informative) 432

As a further note, Dialects are generally distinguished by word choice, Accents by pronunciation. This isn't strictly true, but close enough for our purposes. Also, there's a bunch of discussion about where the fuzzy line is that distinguishes between dialects (i.e. how much drift has to occur before a new dialect is declared).

According to wikipedia and my handy local desk reference here, we're probably looking at these being the most common English dialects in the world (order of speakers, not necessarily native speakers):

  1. American English
  2. British English
  3. Hindi English
  4. Canadian English
  5. Australian English
  6. Bengahli English
  7. Irish English

As noted, there is no "Indian English" - local native languages have had too much influence on spoken English, so there are regional dialects in India (Packistan and Bangladesh, too). There is debate as to whether Scottish English is a dialect (which I tend to agree with), and to what extent New Zealand English should be classified as different than Australian English. Philippino English appears to not quite have made the dialect cutoff yet, despite being considerably different than American Standard English.

Examples of Accents are:

  • American Standard English
  • New England English
  • Southern American English
  • Welsh English
  • East Midland English
  • Dublin English

Last estimate I saw was that English was the #1 spoken language in the world, eclipsing even Mandarin. However, something like 1/4 of all English speakers couldn't be considered fluent. Mandarin (and, I think both Spanish and Hindi, too) have a larger number of native speakers, while English still has by far the largest number of both dialects AND accents of any language (though Spanish dialects are a strong second).

Comment Re:Or maybe on the contrary, let's (Score 1) 496

> > Interstellar travel is wildly impractical. It makes for interesting
> > fiction, but unless our understanding of physics is TOTALLY messed up
> > (*way* more flawed than we currently think pure Newtonian physics was),
> > there's absolutely zero practical application, ever.

> Given the fact that we don't really understand how 95% of the universe works

You appear to have only written the first sentence in my paragraph above, even though you quoted the whole thing. Go back and read the rest of the paragraph. If our understanding of physics is ever drastically revised, then obviously we would revisit the issue (and a great many other issues as well).

But based on everything we currently know, speculating about aliens is only useful for the purpose of entertainment.

Comment Re:Would you rather have completely unsupported HW (Score 1) 151

To respond to you signature, Valve had this idea, and people spurned it at the time. Of course that was before they actually had a bunch of games in their lineup. (At least more than three years ago they did a survey.) The idea was to pay $10-15 and get all the games for free. That idea wasn't bad considering the prices that are paid for games... And you get the kind of support that Steam can offer, such as cloud based services (configuration, saved games, etc.).

Slashdot Top Deals

Air pollution is really making us pay through the nose.

Working...