Comment Re:RTOS (Score 1) 44
Robert Love submitted Preempt/Real Time patches to the Linux Kernel over 20 years ago
Robert Love submitted Preempt/Real Time patches to the Linux Kernel over 20 years ago
X sucks for a modern desktop paradigm because it was created by nerds for nerds. Treating a network connection like a functional IPC mechanism sounds cool, but it just ended up being bandaids on bandaids, trying to make it more than a vga framebuffer. If a user didn't demand a 4k, composited, hardware accelerated, it would be functionally fine.
Wayland was a solution, but as evidence of your complaining, it wasn't quite the replacement that people hoped for.
However, that is the wonderful thing about open source, Linux and brethren, and your desire for something better... if you want something different, something that fits your needs better, then design and code it. Or pay someone else to do it if you don't want to. No one owes you anything here
Cool story, bro
Changing a CPU design is a massive cost. I'm sure they wouldn't even think of it
This is Apple. They have absolutely no qualms with changing CPU architecture
VMWare is a zombie product, nobody with any brains is going to hold on longer than they have to
WTF are you even talking about? VMWare workstation is by far the most popular desktop hypervisor to exist
Or, if you really cared about the brown people from down south stealing your jobs/taking your welfare/fucking your wife, you'd go after the people hiring them first and foremost
And yet, some still install to "c:\PROGRA~1"
No they do not, unless they originally targeted XP and previous. Your modern install of Windows probably has short file names disabled. Aside from that, there is no guarantee that the short filename for "Program Files" is actually "PROGRA~1"
The carriers only have a fixed amount of bandwidth to work with anyhow
Nowhere NEAR as limited as they have you believe. Short of the handful of assholes that would use their cell phone as a torrent seed box, everyone could have ACTUAL unlimited data without throttling and the system would not suffer
What year do you think it is? A typical user isn't a luddite grandma that prints out emails anymore. It is full of technology competent oldheads and youngins that grew up with smartphones and the social media internet. They aren't computer braindead like older generations tended to be, and can tell quite competently the difference between different UIs and available functionality
By its very nature, any hit is going to be humanly inspected because, at bare minimum, someone needs to look at the face that hit so they know who to look for. The human element is still there, it just goes one better than memorizing faces pinned up in the customer service area
Stardock sells Start11 and Open-Shell is still free and works with Windows 11
I can take a picture of a property from the street - I'm not sure why taking one from the sky is different enough to successfully put through the courts
Well, for one, taking imagery of a place from a public vantage, you aren't trespassing. A certain amount of sky above a property is considered part of that property, of course, to a certain point, which is trespassing. Anything above that, you have to deal with the FAA
The entire process could be done on a single server
Pretty clear you don't even know how bitcoin works... so why are you getting so mad?
Being curious isn't illegal. If this even makes it in front of a judge, there isn't a hope in hell that this isn't deemed an unconstitutional search
This would be ripe for killing your political opponents among other things. You are either trolling or braindead
"By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect "Hungry." -- a Larson cartoon