Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Blah (Score 1) 351

In the film, the dwarves conduct a battle from barrels they ride like boats.

Well they had to fight off the troop of Orcs that were hell-bent on chasing them down even though there was no such troupe of Orcs in the book and the lead Orc, Azog although referencing an actual character in Middle Earth lore, had long since been killed by Thorin.

Comment Re:*sips pabst* (Score 1) 351

Tom Bombadil was rightly cut as it served no practical purpose.

Served no purpose? He gave them weapons from the Barrow Downs. These are the weapons with which they fought off the wraiths on weather top. In the movie there is no explanation for how they started out with no weapons and then suddenly had them when they needed them.

Comment Re:sigh (Score 1) 190

>Not everybody's cats are as dumb as mine

Yes they are.

It is a Statistical Mystery as to how 99% of cats are it the bottom quartile of intelligence.

It may have to do with having a brain the size of a walnut . . .

hawk

Comment Re:sigh (Score 1) 190

> I can make an adapter for a Gillette razor if I
> wanted to without breaking any DMCA laws.

When I was in college, Safeway's generic/house brand used the same head.

I bought those, and pulled off the heads to snap on to the better handle . . .

(these were made with nice hard metal, unlike the bic disposables which would cut my face the first time I used them)

hawk

Comment Re:What's next? (Score 1) 190

One of my partners bought one of these for the office.

Then we found reusable filter canisters that we could load with better coffee.

Then it broke.

Our staff makes better coffee without having to clean several of those a day.

hawk

Comment Re:not original (Score 1) 190

Not just obvious, but prior art.

Just about any market does this; the change of price brings other players in, or causes them to leave.

I wrote code for a simulation in '95 or so that had the simulated merchants applying a quadratic equation to the amount that their sales missed the sell-out quantity. It was trivial to cause markets to clear, on just that one piece of information. (In fact, at one point, due to a coding error, the product was a "bad" rather than a "good"--and it still cleared at a negative price.

The algorithm for Uber would be trivial: once the wait time goes above or below its usual band, the price adjusts by some portion per time unit (e.g., 1%/minute) until the wait time is normal. Or include lagged time periods to damp oscillations.

This is just plain trivial. I, or any other computational economist, could sit around all day kicking out new algorithms for this.

It's really pretty simple: if you sell out to quickly, or can't service all your customers, raise your prices; if you have excess, lower them. Doing it by algorithm is nothing new; the trick to patentability would be to find an algorithm that not only hasn't been done before, but is actually better than the other trivially reachable algorithms.

I drove the demand in that model various ways, whether constant, sine waves, stochastic, saw tooth, and probably others I'm not recalling off-hand. A rather simple genetic algorithm rapidly converged in all cases. Mathematically, that method was probably mathematically equivalent to large classes, possibly all, other second order and lower and lower methods or solutions--and the method rather clearly could be extended to nth order . . . (second order methods tend to be sufficient for most things).

hawk

Comment Re:And how many were terrorists? Oh, right, zero. (Score 1) 276

Err, you know you are not only allowed to lock luggage containing a gun, but you are required to do so? It's spelled out explicitly in the rules. [tsa.gov]*

Well, I know NOW, but I did not know before. Most people don't go to TSA.gov and read all of the rules, they just go by what they see at the airport, where it says don't lock your luggage or they will blow it up.

Comment But customers should be told *at booking time* (Score 2) 293

So basically, sure, if they want to shield their entire building from outside RF, with the exception of the entranceway, and as long as its clearly labeled for anyone entering to expect their devices to not work...then fine.

I think if this is allowed then the restriction should also be clearly disclosed at the time when a potential guest is choosing whether to make a booking. I err on the side of not limiting what someone can do within their own premises without a very good reason, but the flip side of that is customers must be able to vote with their wallet for a competing hotel that does not impose the same limitation if that's what they want to do.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...