Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses

Roku To Cut 200 Jobs, or 6% of Its Workforce, In Second Round of Layoffs 21

Roku will lay off 6% of its workforce, or 200 employees, in its second round of job cuts, the U.S. streaming device maker said. Reuters reports: In a bid to lower expenses, the company also decided to exit and sub-lease office facilities that it did not currently occupy. Roku had in November cut 200 jobs in the United States, where companies, led by technology giants such as Meta Platforms and Amazon.com Inc, are bracing for a potential economic downturn amid rising borrowing costs around the world.

Roku, which had about 3,600 full-time employees as of Dec. 31, expects to incur charges of between $30 million and $35 million related to the restructuring. Majority of the restructuring charges will be incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2023, while the job cuts will be completed by the end of the second quarter, the company said.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Roku To Cut 200 Jobs, or 6% of Its Workforce, In Second Round of Layoffs

Comments Filter:
  • They should be happy they still exist.
    • Other than Apple TV, I canâ(TM)t think of a comparable alternative. Weâ(TM)ve been happy with all of ours.

      • Yeah we too were incredibly happy with ours. It's still laying in a drawer somewhere after our new TV basically duplicated 100% of the functionality natively.

        And more may I add, the support for various streaming services including from local NAS, is far better on our TV than it is on the cheap device we used to plug into our old one.

      • I have both a couple generations of both Rokus and Chromecasts, very happy with both.
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • How many want Slashdot to stop reporting on specific tech co. layoffs?

  • Just rename it to RokuGPT and VC's will flood it with cash. Surf fads.

  • Ad spots not selling so well? Bummer.

  • . . . for Roku finally supporting IPV6.

    • Why is this important for a Roku? Is this a real problem or just an abstract one, where you "wish" it used the more efficient way, but where you couldn't tell difference when using the product?

      • by msk ( 6205 )

        You must be unaware of the complaints from users who are in pure IPv6 networks. Check out the official forums.

        • I was, and I did. Forums didn't help much. But I went with the spirit of your reply, and did some more searching. And I found cases where niche providers struggled with this exact problem.

          I concede the point.

  • by Malays2 bowman ( 6656916 ) on Thursday March 30, 2023 @11:25PM (#63413192)

    "X tech company is laying off >1000 employees" has become so common that it's become the white noise of news.

      Tech has always been shakey and always a gamble, and what's hot today might be dead tomorrow even against the "experts" expectations.

      Now if we were hearing something like "Nabisco is laying off 20% of it's workforce", or any other large established company that generally does not go through the bubbles and roller coaster ride that consumer tech companies do, I would be a lot more worried.

  • Used Roku over 10 years ago and it had a fair amount of watchable stuff plus you could load unofficial channels. Well, they blocked side loading, lost channels, I got Netflix and found better alternatives on the internet. Fired it up about a year ago and what's left of any good content is pay walled. Unplugged it.
  • These are the companies that have grown artificially during lockdowns and hired massively at that time. People don't stay at home all day streaming anymore, bubble popped, job count returns to normal.

Life is a healthy respect for mother nature laced with greed.

Working...