CoS Bigwig Likens Wikipedia Ban to Nazis' Yellow Star Decree 567
We mentioned on Thursday that Wikipedia has banned edits originating from certain IP addresses belonging to the Church of Scientology; reader newtley writes now that Scientology leader (CEO and Chairman of the Board of the linked, but legally separate, Religious Technology Center) David Miscavige calls the ban "a 'despicable hate crime,' and asks, 'What's next, will Scientologists have to wear yellow, six-pointed stars on our clothing?' During World War II, Hitler forced Jewish men, women and children to wear a a yellow cloth star bearing the word Jude to brand them in the streets of Europe, and in the Nazi death camps."
You know... (Score:5, Funny)
I remember saying very close to the same thing quite a number of times to various people when I was... 10?
Godwin! (Score:5, Funny)
He loses the argument. End of story.
For a real argument, editing Wikipedia is not akin to, say, being able to buy food. IPs can and do get banned for all sorts of reasons.
Hahaha (Score:5, Funny)
Hahahaha
If they didn't like what Wiki did, they're going to hate being Slashdotted!
Yellow stars have been done to death (Score:5, Funny)
will Scientologists have to wear yellow, six-pointed stars on our clothing?
Actually I was thinking they should be marked with something like a scarlet letter on their foreheads.
Perhaps a big "I" for Idiot.
It would certainly make them easier to spot.
Re:From the article (Score:5, Funny)
Make no mistake: WE are the ones making huge progress in the Global Obliteration of Psychiatry. Wikipedia is acting at Big Psychiatry's beck and call.
This guy needs to see a psychiatrist ASAP.
This is only the beginning. (Score:5, Funny)
Next thing you know Jimbo will be rounding up Scientologists,forcing them into camps near active volcanos, and then blowing them all up with H-bombs.
Re:ORLY? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Godwin! (Score:2, Funny)
Sorry to reply to my own post, but it just struck me, it actually would be a good idea if the nutjobs were forced to wear some distinguishing badge.
As Churchill said, 'a fanatics is someone who can't change his mind, and won't change the subject'...I'm sick of the nutjobs who bore you to tears while they try to convert you to their cause - and there are plenty of them, of all denominations.
Suggestions as to an appropriate badge or sign to make 'em easy to avoid, please.
Re:From the article (Score:5, Funny)
Re:From the article (Score:3, Funny)
What? (Score:5, Funny)
Is that like the chewbacca defense with a Jewish twist?
Yes but..... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:4, Funny)
Do you know which Jews made it through the Holocaust unscathed?
The ones with money who fled early.
Frankly, you can take your bad analogies & shove them up your... no, scratch that - you'd almost certainly enjoy that.
or... (Score:5, Funny)
or six.
*rimshot*
Re:You know... (Score:1, Funny)
Weird and ironic... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Really? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:ORLY? (Score:4, Funny)
Looking at Germany's past history of being overrun by a malevolent cult; and considering Germany has barred Scientolgists from serving in public offices and had moved toward banning them all together at one point...
Wait, the Scientology leader compared Wikipedia to what?
Re:Godwin! (Score:5, Funny)
Sorry to reply to my own post, but it just struck me, it actually would be a good idea if the nutjobs were forced to wear some distinguishing badge.
They already have one. Just look for people who jump up and down on couches and generally look like idiots.
Re:ORLY? (Score:5, Funny)
Honestly, it's the first time I've ever seen a conversation Godwin itself from the original argument.
Well, if nothing else, you've got to admire his efficiency....
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:5, Funny)
Through their complicity, these Jews were responsible for the millions that were slaughtered in the camps.
Oh dear, it was the fault of the Jews all along, was it...who'd have guessed it!
So there you are, surrounded by all your technology and information - and still...
Maybe you should try our free personality test...?
Re:Religion's CEO? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:From the article (Score:5, Funny)
This guy needs to see a psychiatrist ASAP.
It's nothing an R2-45 won't cure.
Re:This is only the beginning. (Score:3, Funny)
Next thing you know Jimbo will be rounding up Scientologists,forcing them into camps near active volcanos, and then blowing them all up with H-bombs.
Ok...when do we get started? :)
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:5, Funny)
So this is basically analogous to having your story submits summarily rejected by a newspaper because you've submitted so much crap in the past.
Well.... they should come on down to Slashdot, let Kdawson show em' how it's done!
Re:Godwin! (Score:4, Funny)
Actually, I'm ok with the yellow star thing (Score:4, Funny)
I think the idea of identifying CoS members has some merit, although a dunce cap might be more appropriate than a yellow star.
Or maybe the Puritans had something: we could dunk them in water, and if their body thetans don't weigh them down, they're truly "clear" and then we can put the dunce cap on them.
I don't know about you all, but I want to be able to identify people with goofy beliefs. At least on Sunday the religious nuts go to church so for a few hours a week we know where they're all at.
Anyway, everybody knows the only true belief system is Thelema.
Re:OT: Why can't I see subject lines? (Score:5, Funny)
The subject lines are fine, perhaps you are overrun by eyeball thetans that are blocking your ability to see them. Only Scientology can restore your ability to see Slashdot subject lines!!
Reductio Ad Hitlerium (Score:2, Funny)
Re:What? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Actually, I'm ok with the yellow star thing (Score:4, Funny)
Anyway, everybody knows the only true belief system is Thelema.
I know you were being sarcastic, but damn... when it comes to people with goofy beliefs, you sure know how to pick 'em. Crowley was nuttier than a Snickers bar.
Re:From the article (Score:4, Funny)
And here I thought it was just acid reflux.
This is all wrong... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Religion's CEO? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:5, Funny)
If just losing editing rights is as bad as Nazi prosecution then by comparison other forms of prosecution must be like killing kittens with sledgehammers.
Didn't you know? Scientologists perform a semi-annual rite in which they kill kittens with sledgehammers and then inject their blood with the contents of the kittens' brain stems. I read it on Wikipedia before the Scientologists edited the article to hide these facts.
Mods: Please MPU Informative (Score:2, Funny)
CoS and Miscavige are FAIL. Over and over again.
(Mod points yesterday, none today..!)
Re:You know... (Score:5, Funny)
Please watch your sources. That site is obviously planted by lord Xenu to undermine the efforts of the great Church of Scientology.You shouldn't be quoting the guy who trapped all these dead souls on earth and enslaved the human race under the evil John Travolta... oh wait, I think I mixed up the Hubbard plots...
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:1, Funny)
Are you referring to CO$ or wikipedia?
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:3, Funny)
If that wall of text was too much for you to read, you should perhaps take a remedial English course. Most books written for adults are written with lengthy paragraphs and very few pictures.
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:3, Funny)
That wall of text would have filled up at least a page or two in a book. The problem is not that it's "Too much to read. " It's just that poorly organized structure of the comment is a strain on the eyes, and requires extra, unnecessary concentration. Just like run-on sentences can make perfect sense, but sometimes you are forced to read it multiple times before the idea the writer is trying to convey forms in your head, and then you can continue reading the next sentence without the uncertainty of possibility of losing track of your position in the text, or trying to think too much about what the fuck the author is trying to say because the sentence is so god damned long you forgot how it began, and you start to wonder why the asshole couldn't just separate his thoughts into a few sentences just to make things a little bit easier on you.
Re:Nothing wrong with his analogy (Score:2, Funny)
I supposed it depends on the people in question.
that reminds me of the joke about the guy who wanted to kill every single jew and a clown
Re:From the article (Score:3, Funny)
Smithers, use the amnesia ray.