Richard Stallman Proclaims Don't Follow Linus Torvalds 965
StonyandCher writes "Here is an interview with Richard Stallman about a range of free software topics including GPLv3 and comment on the Microsoft patent issue. Stallman has a go at Linus Torvalds even suggesting that if people want to keep their freedom they better not follow Torvalds.
From the interview 'Stallman: The fact that Torvalds says "open source" instead of "free software" shows where he is coming from. I wrote the GNU GPL to defend freedom for all users of all versions of a program. I developed version 3 to do that job better and protect against new threats. Torvalds says he rejects this goal; that's probably why he doesn't appreciate GPL version 3. I respect his right to express his views, even though I think they are foolish. However, if you don't want to lose your freedom, you had better not follow him.'"
FP v1 (Score:1, Funny)
Stallman the visionary.... (Score:1, Funny)
Aaaah, what a deathmatch that would be...
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Winning friends and influencing people... (Score:3, Funny)
That sound that you don't hear... (Score:3, Funny)
SHUT UP!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Bloody idiotic egomaniac. This is the exact same kind of fundamentalist zealotry that wants to destroy Christianity and anything other than what Allah wants, does anyone else see that?
Why? (Score:5, Funny)
Apologies to Fox News...
So what next? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Winning friends and influencing people... (Score:2, Funny)
He sees what the purple caterpillar tells him to see.
Downloading GNU/Linux? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:In other news... (Score:1, Funny)
The clause to which you refer merely prevents software vendors from forcing their customers to shower before using the product. Its addition came after one proprietary vendor established mandatory 3-hour submersion before license activation (of a product incorporating GPLed code).
Now, some would argue the vendor had no right to take its users' lives in exchange for license activation, but I'm with the Stallman-critics in this debate. Can we really claim the GPL upholds freedom when it takes away the freedom of software vendors to drown (with consent, of course) their users?
No, this GPLv4 clause is clearly misguided. Proprietary vendors of GPLed code should be freely permitted to drown users in exchange for product activation. This is true freedom, which the hippie Stallman with his inexplicable appreciation of "ethics" could not possibly understand.
Re:Winning friends and influencing people... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Stallman the visionary.... (Score:5, Funny)
Aaaah, what a deathmatch that would be...
Boring, I think: Stallman drones on for three hours about a world of fluffy bunnies, giving Torvalds time to build a 30 foot tall mecha which stomps his adversary into paste in about half a second.
Re:its all about hurd (Score:5, Funny)
The 3 letter acronyms (Score:3, Funny)
except that... (Score:4, Funny)
everyone knows hippies dont wear underwear...
Re:Winning friends and influencing people... (Score:3, Funny)
My guess is that RMS is rounder than you. Linus is also starting to pack on some weight too.
Re:Definitely different goals (Score:3, Funny)
"If you [...] and appreciate only powerful reliable software, you are making a terrible mistake." -RMS
Phew. At least Microsoft isn't making terrible mistakes.
Re:Spotlighting no action (Score:1, Funny)
the GCC people (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Please stop the foolish jokes and think. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Hey Stallman, how's Hurd coming along? (Score:3, Funny)
What's wrong with normal speed?
Re:its all about hurd (Score:4, Funny)