Firefox 2.0 To Debut Tuesday 445
An anonymous reader writes "Firefox 2.0 for Tuesday, says the Seattle PI. They give a quick recap of some of the new features, and discuss the ongoing IE vs. Fox debate." From the article: "Version 2.0 also improves on the tabbed-windows interface that Mozilla innovated and that Microsoft introduced for the first time last week with IE7, its biggest upgrade since 2001. Analysts said IE7 is a significant improvement over its predecessor, but the big question is whether it will stem Firefox's growth at Microsoft's expense. Firefox's share of the browser market has grown to 9.8 percent of the U.S. market this month, from 2.9 percent in October 2004."
innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
"Web browsers are notable for implementing this kind of interface (called tabbed browsing). BookLink Technologies pioneered this interface design in its InternetWorks browser in 1994"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabbed_browsing [wikipedia.org]
Re:Lies (Score:2, Informative)
MDI (Score:5, Informative)
But of course other browsers had tabs far earlier than any of these two.
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Minimum tab size (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Minimum tab size (Score:5, Informative)
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.tabs.closeButto
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.tabs.tabMinWidt
Re:YAY! (Score:5, Informative)
I find "Client-side session and persistent storage [whatwg.org]" to be quite interesting, and wonder if any major web apps will make use of it in the near future. There are also JavaScript 1.7 [mozilla.org] which makes JavaScript more Pythonic, SVG [mozilla.org] support, and several other features.
TabMixPlus RC (Score:3, Informative)
RC1 of new TabMixPlus version (with FF 2.0 support) is already available.
Good news for me.
Re:Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:5, Informative)
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Reducing_memory_usage_-
Re:Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:5, Informative)
FACT: OPERA DID NOT INVENT TABBED BROWSING! (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabbed_browsing [wikipedia.org]
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
May I ask what are those other browsers you're talking about? I am aware of 4 major browsers other than Firefox. Let's have a look at them and how they compare with firefox.
IE7 - It finally got tabs and a search box but still has crappy html and css standards support. Actually it's a little worse than MyIE [myie2.com] for IE6. I'll pass.
Safari - Has a lot the basic features of a good browser and is very simple. Respects HTML and CSS standards. Has crappy PNG support (gamma correction) and for some reason scrolls slowly even on fast machines. It's a fine browser but I prefer Camino [caminobrowser.org].
Konqueror - Although I have limited experience with this one, it looks like a good browser/file manager, but I am un-aware of any features (appart from passing that ACID2 test) that make it better than Firefox.
Opera - The only browser that is at least feature-wise better than firefox. But for some people Open Source actually matters. Though even with that into the equation, I can't really say which one is the better browser.
So, while you can argue and I might accept that opera is better than firefox, what are the other browsers that I've been missing that are better than the "overrated" firefox? Oh, and preferably opensource.
Re:FACT: OPERA DID NOT INVENT TABBED BROWSING! (Score:1, Informative)
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Tuesday? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:FACT: OPERA DID NOT INVENT TABBED BROWSING! (Score:1, Informative)
(emphasis mine)
If you actually RTFA, you'd find out that "BookLink Technologies pioneered this interface design in its InternetWorks browser in 1994."
Stop spreading the myth.
Re:innovation? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:innovation? (Score:5, Informative)
But in terms of compatibility with the vast majority of websites, Firefox is far ahead of every other competitor.
I'm a power user. I routinely switch between Camino, Safari, Firefox, and IE under CrossOver as I'm browsing different sites and designing web pages. But for my friends who aren't power users and want something that "just works", I always recommend Firefox. It's safer than IE and has a few nice features that they'll appreciate, but is still simple and most importantly, is going to work on 99% of the sites they visit. Safari, Opera, Konqueror, and others all have compatibility problems.
Re:Two of my prayers for FireFox Improvement (Score:2, Informative)
Um, acid2 represents one faction's idea on what an ideal, future-proof CSS implementation should do. It's not be-all end-all test of absolute must-have features of CSS. Gecko doesn't fall too far from the goal, and rest assured they're working on the issues.
I'm not using the beta yet. Um... I would terribly appreciate it if middle-click would do nothing. Currently, on Linux, middle-clicking goes into the URL that I have on selection buffer. Middle click gets clicked by accident awfully often when scrolling and I end up staring at http://www.whateverthecrapihadonclipboardwhenmymou seslipped.com/ [whateverth...lipped.com] (see below).
Um... seems like this can be fixed in about:config. middlemouse.contentLoadURL = false. I think. Didn't know this. Very cool.
Another beef is the automatic expansion of example => http://www.example.com/ [example.com] which just gives me bunch of false alarms. If I find myself looking at http://www.whateverthecrapihadonclipboardwhenmymou seslipped.com/ [whateverth...lipped.com], I'm going to scream. While I'm at it, it shouldn't even assume I want http:/// [http] there; it should demand full URLs. And above the heck all, if I want to use this as a search engine, I type "g (keywords)", not the plain address - I don't want a search bar, I don't want an intelligent search bar;I just want an ordinary address bar that also has this keyword support thing. Is it too much to ask?
I think this is at least the latter is somehow fixable through about:config, but I forgot the instructions (didn't try it at first because it appeared to have side effects). Setting keyword.url = about:blank, keyword.enabled = false has little effect...
Re:MDI (Score:2, Informative)
Newer versions of Opera also have a restricted MDI mode that's similar to Mozilla tabs.
-- dbg
Re:IE 7 Quick Tabs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:IE 7 Quick Tabs (Score:4, Informative)
Omniweb has had it for a little while, here's a screenshot [omnigroup.com].
Re:innovation? (Score:2, Informative)
In other words, point doesn't apply here.
Re:innovation? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I'm a web developer (Score:5, Informative)
Fx 1.5 uses Gecko 1.8
Fx 2 uses Gecko 1.8.1, so a much smaller change (as in no new feature in HTML/CSS, just bug fixes I think). The new features are in SVG (textPath support), JavaScript (1.7) and Client-side session and persistent storage [whatwg.org]
Fx 3 will be the next big jump to Gecko 1.9, with the reflow that will fix Acid 2 and incremental layout bugs, plus more CSS 2.1 and CSS 3 support.
Summary Is wrong (Score:2, Informative)
You just put egg on your face with that comment because clearly Mozilla copied that idea from Opera. Is it OK for Mozilla to copy but not MS?
Re:MDI (Score:3, Informative)
MDI is very unintuitive on its own - tabs make it much better by putting, well, a tab on the page so you know it's there.
Closest analogy is Windows 95 property sheets I guess, although they weren't the first (just the first that most people will have used).
Re:innovation? (Score:4, Informative)
Switch between tabs
CTRL+TAB or CTRL+SHIFT+TAB
Switch to a specific tab number
CTRL+n (where n is a number between 1 and 8)
Switch to the last tab
CTRL+9
Re:Tuesday? (Score:3, Informative)
Firefox 2.0 Themes (Score:4, Informative)
Re:innovation? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:YAY! (Score:5, Informative)
Is this a non-standard attribute?
We wanted web pages to control the spellchecking defaults to some degree. For example, webmail applications will want to automatically turn it on for subject lines, even though it is normally off for <input> elements.
We discussed with the WHATWG web standards group to come up with the attribute. I'm not sure about the status of this in any of their specs, as I'm not sure there was any strong consensus. That's one of the problems coming out with a new feature not currently supported in any other browser or mentioned in any standards.
- Brett (Firefox spellcheck contributor)Re:MDI (Score:3, Informative)
Tabs being in such a case buttons linking to the child windows. Hmm, I'm pretty sure Win 3.1 supported buttons
Re:innovation? (Score:3, Informative)
That's the same shortcuts as FF1.5
Re:Another reason to use Opera.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:MDI (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Auto update to 2.0? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:innovation? (Score:2, Informative)