Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Since when is money laundering a "loophole"? (Score 3, Insightful) 406

by Sir Homer (#45255711) Attached to: A Look at the Koch Brothers Dark-Money Network

The article is confusing, but it seems like the fine is actually $16.03 million. What is infuriating is this is a settlement agreement so that the state will not release the names of the donors. It looks as if they are basically paying off the state so they don't have the deal with the public fallout.

Comment: Re:In addition.... (Score 5, Insightful) 287

by Sir Homer (#42634035) Attached to: JSTOR an Entitlement For US DoJ's Ortiz & Holder

There is a lot of tax payer funded research that is inaccessible to the public despite their hand in its creation. I think that this aspect needs to be discussed, as well.

I don't even see anything to discuss. Seriously, how the hell is this acceptable?

And Swartz's super serious multi-felony crime was trying to fix this situation? Every time I look back at this case, it befuddles me. The only insane people here are the prosecution, and they need to be called out on it and punished along with everyone involved in this travesty of justice.

Comment: Cost of print subscription cheaper than digital? (Score 3, Insightful) 178

by Sir Homer (#39427961) Attached to: New York Times Halves Monthly Free Article Views To Ten

Am I reading this wrong? It seems that the cost of a print subscription is $3.85 a week but INCLUDES the $35/mo (holy crap that's expensive) digital subscription.

It kind of baffles me 500,000 people paying as much as ISP service for access to a single newpaper? Are they including print subscriptions in that number

Comment: Re:Protecting rights (Score 1) 517

by Sir Homer (#38700762) Attached to: White House Responds To SOPA, PIPA, and OPEN

You are seriously using the GPL in an argument on why copyright is a good idea? The GPL is designed to use to use copyright to subvert its fundamental purpose! Instead of saying "you can not sure", GPL says "you MUST share". It goes against every argument the copyright minimalists make the purpose for copyright is. That's why it's called a "copyleft license", it turns copyright on its head.

Comment: Re:Of course it does (Score 1) 530

by Sir Homer (#38204840) Attached to: Does Open Source Software Cost Jobs?

Efficency is were wealth comes from. If everyone is breaking windows the economy will grid to a standstill, there has to people doing actual productive work and software is an important foundation to modern world and shouldn't be squandered or guildified in the name of jobs. I appricate that you don't BS about your motives though.

Anyway as long as there is people still working there will be work for software engineers, actually our job is to put other people out of jobs (regardless of license of the software). I really think "software engineer" will be the last job in existence once we have automated everything else.

Anytime you write software that makes people more productive or automate business processes, you are taking a step down that road.

Comment: Re:The real solution is to stop being nice. (Score 1) 287

by Sir Homer (#37848236) Attached to: Americas New CIO Wants To Disrupt Government and Make It a Startup

"Migrate folks to it" with what authority?

I assure you the system administrator teams running those 21 other e-mail systems will not let you touch it with a 500 foot poll, and no strong leadership compels them otherwise.

The problem is this is exactly how those 21 e-mail systems came to be. I bet they all had the idea of becoming the "one corporate e-mail system", but got mired in politics and insanity along the way.

Comment: Re:Biggest TCP/IP mistake (Score 1) 150

by Sir Homer (#37833458) Attached to: Vint Cerf Answers Your Questions About IPv6 and More

TCP is simple to use (from the view of someone doing network programming), but under the scenes it is crazy complicated to implement properly.
  Fortunately you really only need someone to implement a TCP stack once (in open source) and it can be reused in a multitude of operating systems. BSD pretty much set the standard for a TCP/IP stack (TCP Reno) and everyone went from there.

Comment: Re:Biggest TCP/IP mistake (Score 2) 150

by Sir Homer (#37833212) Attached to: Vint Cerf Answers Your Questions About IPv6 and More

Stream protocols that offer error, flow and congestion control over heterogeneous datagram networks are NOT trivial.

TCP is not trivial at all. In fact & efficient algorithms to implement features of TCP is still an area of active research. IETF RFCs in various stages of standardization related to TCP probably amount to thousands of pages at this point, and it's still growing. Linux recently got a new algorithm for congestion control for instance:

At the source of every error which is blamed on the computer you will find at least two human errors, including the error of blaming it on the computer.