Slashdot Log In
Reconfigurable Supercomputers
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Wed Feb 10, 1999 03:52 AM
from the stuff-to-poke-at dept.
from the stuff-to-poke-at dept.
VanL writes "
A previously unknown company
has come up with a supercomputer design using programmable logic components.
If this is right, this might be another case of a garage inventor changing
the computing paradigm. In the meantime, they are claiming incredible
things from their demo computer: It is the worlds fastest computer
(3-4x faster than IBM's Pacific Blue, and 10x faster than a Cray); it is
fault-tolerant enough that you could shoot a bullet through it and it would
keep on working; it will run any operating system out-of-the-box; and it
is the size of a normal desktop computer and runs off household current.
They call it HAL. ;) Check out the press
release, a news
story, and a more detailed description of the company and the technology
here."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Reconfigurable Supercomputers
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 181 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
- Address is a Secret by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:46AM
- Cold Fusion II by hurin (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:34AM
- PLEASE, open source your code, and patents by Chris Johnson (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:20AM
- All I can say is... by Codifex Maximus (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:13AM
- All I can say is... by Codifex Maximus (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:13AM
- No Subject Given by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @03:59AM
- Supercomputer by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:43AM
- That, and the Irish Girl's uber-crypto! by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:46AM
- Fascinating stuff by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:28AM
- in principle... by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:48AM
- Any OS? by gavinhall (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:09PM
- Apples and Oranges by sjames (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:37AM
- Superspecificity! by CaseyB (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:26AM
- Big Deal... by Shaman (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:53AM
- Real numbers, please? by Troy Baer (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:49AM
- Real numbers, please? by Troy Baer (Score:1) Thursday February 11 1999, @12:50PM
- True Test by SiliconJesus (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:13AM
- Why is my baloney detector ringing? by vallee (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:05AM
- The performance specs are bogus by substrate (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:38AM
- Possible but Skeptical by pridkett (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:03AM
- Imagine... by Hallow (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:12AM
- Beowolf by Chardros (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:23AM
- Can it convert lead into gold as well? by burnsbert (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:06AM
- April Fools? by Avenger (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:34AM
- The question mark?s make it real!! by Greg Newton (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @12:22PM
- I'm having problems with this... by mhkohne (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @08:10AM
- Here's one of their patents by CrezzyMan (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:47AM
- Hack the Gibson... by WhiteDragon (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @02:46PM
- Spelling Flame by kabloie (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:14PM
- No Subject Given by Kythe (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:18AM
- The benchmarking I really care about! by The Master Magician (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:12AM
- Time to change the map? by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:00AM
- Time to change the map? by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:01AM
- Xilinx FPGA's not programmable at that speed by Chris Burke (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:15PM
- No Subject Given by NAK (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:06AM
- NT or Unix? by GleekOid (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @12:08PM
- FPGAs by martian (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @03:59AM
- No Patents by D-Fly (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @02:29PM
- Hmmmmm.... by GodEater (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:16AM
- Some HP researchers were working on this by cmaxx (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:58AM
- Hmmm... by mindedc (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:48AM
- StarBridge pages moved to... by leonbrooks (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @03:06PM
- Baloney, huh? by Poopdbq (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:22AM
- this MUST be a joke... right? by Bassie (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:39AM
- They're not the only ones. by smugfunt (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:51AM
- Where I come from... by scrytch (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:13AM
- It's patented. by Arrgh (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @08:56AM
- Apparently, yes. by Tuor (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @11:48AM
- If this is true... by NYC (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:24AM
- yearh right! by Dion (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:38AM
- Large dose of salt, table 2... by xyzzy (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:09AM
- Large dose of salt, table 2... by xyzzy (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:42AM
- I've seen start-ups like this before... by korc (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:06AM
- bull(cough)shit by F2F (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:20AM
- No, that's a nanotech issue. by renoX (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:02AM
- Fundamental problems with this architecture. by Christopher Thomas (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:29AM
- It might be worthy by Zog (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:27AM
- HERE'S SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT... by Panaflex (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:10AM
- Farse by Zebra_X (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:43AM
- Limited machine by funkman (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:12AM
- Baloney is still rather tasty... by Epitaph (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:34AM
- Fascinating stuff by thalakan (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:19AM
- You'd think for $26 million... by MattJ (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @09:45AM
- How??? by BiGGO (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:49AM
- Wolf! Wolf! by Nickbot (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:36AM
- Perhaps more embarrassment for Salt Lake . . . by layne (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:11AM
- is the olympic committee behind this? by rvr (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:37AM
- I want to see the bullet test. by vt0asta (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:32AM
- You call this *writing*? by mindslip (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @02:03PM
- Let's see it render by Straker Skunk (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:05AM
- No More Secrets by eyeball (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @04:42AM
- Hmmmm... by Gottjager (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:27AM
- Naaa, it's a scam by rob hafernik (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:39AM
- Ooops... my bad by rob hafernik (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:43AM
- Superspecificity! by fcw (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @05:42AM
- Computer Benchmarks by Webdancer (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:02AM
- My rebuttal of the HAL Super by _observer (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @09:56AM
- HERE'S SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT... by _observer (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @10:33AM
- Got to be fake... by Vin (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @03:32PM
- Back-o-the-Napkin Debunking by Brazilian (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @08:44AM
- Windows 2000 by gr0k (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @06:49AM
- fps in quake2 by iocc (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @08:32AM
- RJ-11 connector?! by Durham (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @07:08AM
- 98 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1)
|
2