Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Mark this one for the history books, folks. (Score 1) 183

by Codifex Maximus (#35675270) Attached to: US To Send Radiation-Hardened Robots To Japan

Why not take some of that steam generated by the primary and run a failsafe turbine that doesn't generate electricity. It should just run pumps to keep the secondary cooling system running in the event of electrical failure. This way, even if the system has been flooded, cooling continues AND the hotter the primary gets, the faster the turbine will turn and the more cooling should be effected.

Comment: Re:Hmmm ... (Score 1) 755

by Codifex Maximus (#35623326) Attached to: CMU Eliminates Object Oriented Programming For Freshman

Well, here we have two opposing views of programming. On the one hand, we've got the Systems style programmer who can bootstrap a machine using binary digit displays and toggle switches. On the other hand we've got a Scriptor who uses canned programming.

There are pros and cons to both approaches:
The Systems programmer will take longer to do the job, assuredly. But, when he's done, the result will be tight fast efficient code that will get the job done in a fraction of the time a script could.
The Scriptor can probably hack together something that will get the job done but will not scale well. You'll need a supercomputer/Beowulf cluster to handle the load.

My opinion is: Use the scripting languages to prototype and make the final product a compilation like C/C++/PASCAL etc...

C++ is Object Oriented and it is also compiled. Best of both worlds.

Baby On Board.

Working...