Slashdot Log In
Google buys Pyra Labs
Posted by
chrisd
on Sun Feb 16, 2003 02:38 AM
from the everything-old-is-new-again dept.
from the everything-old-is-new-again dept.
Argyle writes "SiliconValley.com reports that Google has bought Pyra Labs. Pyra Labs is the creator of the Blogger software and runs the blogger.com and blogspot.com services. In weblog fashion, founder Evan Williams reported the news on his weblog in the middle of the Live from the Blogosphere event."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I think (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.tomservo.net/)
Not only could you search the Internet, but you could refine your searches just to other people's thoughts, etc.
Mark another one up for Google being one of the best tech companies in the business world.
Re:I think (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.empiredown.com/)
Look, Google is a great search engine, but that doesn't mean that everything it touches turns to gold. It's not "the next big thing," nor is it a silly buzzword that you can bander around randomly.
Re:I think (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Based on their past performance...
Google image search? Hoo yeah.
Maps, phonebooks, toolbar, search-term
spellchecker? Good ideas all, if not earthshattering, but it shows a consistent effort to improve the utility and relevance of their product.
Google News? Big pluses here.
Google Answers? Heh. Okay. But like I said, it deserved to be explored.
Google AdWords? They found -advertising- that -doesn't suck-. Yeesh. What does it take to impress you?
If your opinion differs, so be it, but I'm not sure you're basing it on -anything- other than reflexive avoidance of a perceived agenda.
What's the name? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~amitp/ | Last Journal: Saturday February 21 2004, @10:15PM)
Re:What's the name? (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.eng.utah.edu/~carrell/)
Re:I think (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://go.away/)
Sweet screaming monkeys would that be pointless. Blogs are like dreams; they're only interesting to the people they belong to. If by some freakish twist of fate I cared about your last trip to Reno or what kind of sandwich you ate last week, I'd ask you.
Ten years later... (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday July 18 2003, @10:58PM)
Re:Ten years later... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://naenary.com/ | Last Journal: Friday January 02 2004, @03:57PM)
IBM
CISCO
AMD
Intel (ok -they get some flack but they are not hated)
NVidia
The Slashdot crowd (for the most part) do not care how big a corporation is, but how good the service they provide. As long as Google remains just awesome, the slashdot crowd will kiss its solid gold ass.
Great :( (Score:5, Funny)
I bet this'll be good. (Score:3, Interesting)
Google has never done anything that hasn't redefined what went before it.
The Google Catapult (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://fury.com/)
Curiosities I have are how Google will deal with it's first for-pay service, and what, if any, value-adds Google will give to Blogger blogs: Higher rankings in search results? Possibly. Live posting into Google's search index? Probably. I'm sure there are ideas that haven't even been thought of yet.
I can't wait to see where this goes! I just wish I was a part of it.
Nothing so big (Score:5, Insightful)
just me or .. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:just me or .. (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.empiredown.com/)
Yahoo, as an example of a portal site, uses Google as a web-searching tool. Frankly, I don't see why Google would want to move towards being a portal site, when that niche is already filled by a number of quality sites.
I hope this works out for the good. (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.subgenius.com/)
more even more people participating because of the
google tie-in. It would be very very nice if it got
so big that all kinds of news that our mostly
corporate influenced media didn't report on got out
and about and all around. I hope this turns into
one very huge good thing.
Pay for blogs (Score:3, Funny)
(Last Journal: Saturday February 15 2003, @07:54PM)
I hope there isn't job cuts planned (Score:1)
(http://www.kaillera....topic=1743&forum=5&0 | Last Journal: Tuesday August 10 2004, @02:43PM)
Investor "Oh why did you scale back? I thought you said we needed all these workers to make product!"
CEO "Nevermind those bums, we just aquired another company and all their intellectual property! Because of the merger we now own 20 patents in blogging technology that are good for another 20 years! Since we already have the R&D for these patents completed, we can fire the new guys too! That's going to make our stock worth more!"
Investor "I'll buy that for a dollar!"
I really don't know if google is a good/bad company, I can't really say the above skit is anything more than fiction in regards to google, but I have seen similiar things happen in the business world. I just hope in another 15 years google doesn't go after all the people using their own open source blogging software claiming royaltee's on an idiotic patent.
Damn, I'm sounding a bit too YRO slashdotish today.
Think of the back-end info this gives them (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://blog.jwiz.org/mt/)
This isn't about Google pumping up Blogger, or BlogSpot. This is about them acquiring direct access to blog data.
--
Jordan
yes and...think data mining (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyone thinking this is so google can be a better neighbor isn't paying attention.
Your blogs belong to google. Hand 'em over.
Re:Think of the back-end info this gives them (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm)
This isn't about Google pumping up Blogger, or BlogSpot. This is about them acquiring direct access to blog data.
Also, Google News works great, except it is sometimes slow to react to current events (Shuttle breakdown took a few hours to appear or so?). Blogs are known to be very fast information suppliers if a crisis is going on. Perhaps News can use the Blogs to spot something important quickly.
Cool. (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://suppafly.livejournal.com/)
If you are going to be at google to look up other site, pictures, catalogs, etc. might as well get your daily blogging needs taken care of as well.
Whats next? (Score:1, Flamebait)
(http://suppafly.livejournal.com/)
Maybe some day in the not so distant future, google will be big enough to buy microsoft.
I dunno why I would want to but... (Score:1, Offtopic)
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/ruoppolo/ | Last Journal: Monday December 12 2005, @02:51AM)
Drop in a working apache server
Be able to simply add pictures, links, etc. Cant be too complicated tho
Option to keep a post private
Uh-oh (Score:2)
google...the *in thing* for CS folks (Score:2, Interesting)
i wanted to post anonymously but what the heck.
a related thing came up recently in our research group chitchat that google is actually sucking up quite a few of the top notch CS folks - rob pike anyone?:)
and it so happens that a couple of weeks back a bunch of lets say "highly talented" folks left the company i work for to google....:)
this acquisition seems to revalidate that they sure seem to be quite active and healthy and i am darn proud because the founders are our alumni......
Buying and selling the wisdom of the masses (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://members.dsl-only.net/~mbonner | Last Journal: Monday May 12 2003, @03:39PM)
They bought Deja News, or whatever it was called, giving them direct access to the wisdom of the masses, as encoded in newsgroups. Except that newsgroups seem to be a fading concept, supplanted by mailing lists and blogs. Well, Google can't very well buy mailing lists (from whom would you buy them?) but they just bought most of the blogs. Note that they haven't bought or apparently even tried to buy any traditional mass-media company (CNN, NY Times, Knight-Ridder, etc). In the business world, nobody has placed much value so far on the collected, shared knowledge of the masses, so Google can buy Deja and Pyra for cheap.
The big question is what owning the major information conduits of the masses gets Google. Google didn't just buy Atrios [blogspot.com] or Dave Barry [blogspot.com], they bought the medium everyone is using to blog.
This kind of gets me back to an idea [dsl-only.net] I blogged about a little while back--that you could probably make a business out of aggregating blogs into an ersatz net magazine and selling advertising space on the result. Google presents the advertisers with the combined traffic of the top 20 blogs, shows them a prototype of a salon-style magazine and asks how much they'd pay for ad space, then goes to those top 20 blogs and asks them whether they'd agree to publish regularly in exchange for some (smallish) cut of the ad revenue.
Makes me wonder how long we have until Google buys LiveJournal [livejournal.com]...
adeu,
Mateu
Why I am puzzled (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.searchbistro.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday February 16 2003, @06:18AM)
a. Google News
Dan Gillmor [siliconvalley.com], who broke this story, mentioned in an update the possibility, that the weblog links can be used to improve Google News.
But Google doesn't need to buy Pyra for that. Google can spider any leading weblog they want. Yes, there was this problem of interlinked weblogs resulting in a high PR (PageRank) for certain logs, but Google fixed that problem by giving more value to outgoing links then incoming links. They don't need to buy Blogger for indexing of weblogs.
b. Portal
Another suggestion that has been made: Google is moving to a portal.
I refuse to believe that Google is getting megalomanic. Besides, we all know what happened to AltaVista.
c. Direct access
Jshare suggested Google bought Blogger to get direct access to blog data.
But crawling the 200.000 active Blogs doesn't cost much resources. It's only a few gig of data. Why bother to buy a whole firm for that?
d. Journal with ads
Mateub suggests that Google could make a magazine out of the blogs, complete with ads.
But they can do that already. Have a close look at news.google.com. Search for, hmm, Google [google.com] At the right side, there's enough space for ads. Google could index just the weblogs, like Daypop, and make a new product out of it (without buying Pyra).
Whatever the reason is behind the buy, it will have a huge impact. The simple fact that one of the hottest internet companies buys Pyra's Blogger will make the product main stream in months.
Henk van Ess editor of Voelspriet [voelspriet.nl]
TIP: Check Ovidiu Predescu [webweavertech.com] site now and then. He started working at Google's on January 22 and writes about it in his ...weblog.
Re:Why I am puzzled (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanhogg/ | Last Journal: Sunday April 20 2003, @04:03PM)
I think it's when they update rather than how often that's exciting. When big events happen, people tend to comment on it immediately. Crawling once a day can't catch the moment.
But Google has a big relevancy filter, PageRanking.
But this is calculated on a very infrequent basis (comparatively). If I searched for Google and Pyra, I wouldn't find this announcement because it may not get crawled and page ranked for a month. Whereas people were commenting on it in blogs within minutes.
Your remarks make me think though. Google could use Pyra's Blogger for a dedicated search engine like Daypop, but with faster updates and perhaps better filters (although the PR in combination with keyword density and other factors does a good job). Those results can also be integrated in the normal engine.
But I'm wondering if they do this at once, or wait till Blogger has more then active 200.000 users. What do you think?
I think you can already see what I find most exciting about the combination of Google and Blogger
Time is a powerful dimension that traditional crawlers can only map in a very course-grained way. Via the back-end of a large blogging engine, you can watch memes move in realtime.
What is this Slashdot thing, anyway? (Score:1)
(http://www.lutero.com/weblog | Last Journal: Sunday February 16 2003, @08:25AM)
I have seen a lot of comments that bash or deride weblogs, but you are insulting the very thing that you are using to post your insults. In addition, Slashdot has a Journal feature that smacks of a weblog as well. Can we bite the hand that feeds us? Sure, but only at the risk of starvation.
ICQ vs. AIM.... again (Score:1)
OS Change? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 03 2002, @01:58PM)
Might give blogspot.com blogs unfair advantage (Score:2)
(http://www.underreported.com/)
If Google spiders blogspot.com blogs from day one, that gives them an unfair advantage.
Congrats to Pyra! (Score:2)
Seriously tho, this is actually inspiring for me since I've always felt like I wanted to do my own idea(s) and there's always someone there - from the awful 'manager' to press to whatever else - putting down those ideas in favor of conformity or dissing them due to their lack of vision. That might not be Pyra's feelings, but to know someone has really stuck to their guns in face of all kinds of obstacles, gives me some hope to keep pushing forward.
A Solution? (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://wws.danklein.net/)
Google get knowledge (Score:1)
Boston Public Library. (Score:1)
(http://guidetoproble...use.buzzword.com/faq | Last Journal: Sunday November 14 2004, @12:34AM)
Bloggle or Bloogle? (Score:2)
(http://foo.ewu.edu/ | Last Journal: Monday June 18, @12:43PM)
Web reviewers are one possibility, of course, but how many reviewers would it take to cover the web as it now sits - google just told me it is "searching 3,083,324,652 web pages".
Blogging and its relatives are probably far more powerful when allied with automatic page classification and ranking.
Suppose Google builds an extended blog format - perhaps with XML tags - and a tool to make entries using that format. This already gives them some more meta information that could be useful in building better searches.
And, as has been said, the ability to track the activity in a blog on a (sort of) real time basis gives them the capability to track news as it happens.
But there are more possibilities yet - just knowing the times entries are made gives you some information. If you have a blog coming from a specific user (track by cookies or even IP) you can correlate blog entries with google searches and with the user looking at other blogs. Sure, much of this will be uncorrelated, but add it all together and I suspect it will start to show interesting patterns. And much of this kind of information will only be available to an organization hosting the blogs.
I think there are other ways to extract more information from a blogger as well.
This could pay off big for Google as a search engine and augmented information indexer - most especially if they can get the human factors right and tempt a few more people into blogging.
(There's more - and in some rather more specific domains and contexts - but google seems uninterested in hiring me, so I don't see any good reason in giving them my ideas.)
AHAHAHAHAHAHA! (Score:2)
Some Thoughts From The Missing Sock Drawer (Score:1)
(http://www.godseye.com/wordpress/ | Last Journal: Friday January 03 2003, @05:05PM)
This topic is of some interest to me because I just wrote a Google Widget that uses the Google API to do geographic searches of Blogs (it was just in SlashBack; godseye [godseye.com]).
No relationship to this acquisition, but it still felt vaguely spooky. I promise to get to the point. So skip the next paragraph.
It's also weird that people are talking about the Memex - just the other week I was chatting away in the Google API forums about amazon recommendation like incidental pathways found through client side bookmarking. And I actually think Google is going to continue to ignore client side improvements- but it will be interesting to see what new kinds of indexing they create for their own little ecosystem. Will they seperate semantic content?
The most striking part of all this is Google having a hand in the development of the Blogger API, which sets what is supposed to be evolving into an simple open standard for inter-blogware communication, invocation, et cetera. Some of the Google engineers must be pulling their hair out (yes, yes, I know that they're both brilliant and enlightened, but this is the chaotic frontier we're talking about here) trying to see where blogs / knowledge management systems (hello?) are taking the web as a whole in a hurry, search algorithms be damned.
Will Google also gain control of the syndication standards, whatever passes for RSS/XSS/whatever? How do you properly index ongoing permutations of feed standards, if everyone snarfs feeds, or if your base algorithms depend on pages mostly staying in one place? Maybe someone who feel that they know more about the future of syndication can enlighten.
Read what "Google Village" says (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.primidi.com/)
Blogoshpere (Score:1)
(http://www.spacebrothers.com/)
The announcement is very exciting - I was there when he made it.
But it's scary, too.
At the panel. "Doc" Searles praised GeoCities as being an early example of web apps helping people publish online - empowering folks to put their own shit out there.
As former Senior Web Developer for GeoCities, I appreciate his sentiment. That's why I loved working there - and what makes the Internet special.
On the Net - no matter how much big media wants to monopolize it as a pipe to deliver the same old content - the Net is about the uploads, not the downloads. It's about you, and me, and that grrrl over there.
I fervently hope the Google purchase of Pyra doesn't result in a Borg-like assimilation of Blogger.com; GeoCities _disappeared_ as a brand after we were assimilated by Yahoo!
If Blogger lowers the threshold by making web publishing as easy as sending an email, the other interesting tidbit that came out of the Blogosphere event was the demonstration of audio blogging [audblog.com] from the folks from AudBlog.com.
Dial AudBlog, enter your s3kr!+ PIN on the cell phone, and you're on the air! You can hold up the phone to record events (this was the mind-blowing way they showed off the product) or talk to the hand to "tell your story."
If Blogger made self-publishing as easy as email AudBlog makes it easy as dialing a phone!
Congrats to the Pyra people, props to Doc, and good luck AudBlog!
Re:what's the limit? (Score:1)
(http://www.bigredgiant.com/)
Re:what's the limit? (Score:1)
News for Nerds, Stuff that matters (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Tuesday July 01 2003, @09:08PM)
Having said that, this Google's acquisition of Pyra Labs is pretty interesting because Google (until today) targets mass majority and Pyra Labs, if I understand correctly, does not target mass majority. Blogging is only for a certain type of population. How would Google transform that into stuff for mass majority if they plan to do so? Interesting to see what they are going to do with Pyra Labs's technologies.
Re:Great! (Score:2)
(http://www.freeipods.com/?r=8857780 | Last Journal: Thursday August 28 2003, @09:39AM)
2)Spend $101M/yr for 2 yrs.
3)???
4)Profit!
How stupid do you think people are?
Re:Helping with the death of weblogging. (Score:1)
(http://www.beezly.org.uk/)
Of course, the AC also missed one important fact. When someone writes things in a blog, do they actually CARE if anyone reads them? I know I don't.
Re:Helping with the death of weblogging. (Score:1)
(http://www.vjoebaldwin.co.uk/)
Blogs can be good for many things. Exposing corporate shams, for instance. If you say what the fsckwad in a certain CompUSA store said/did to you, you are helping people make an informed decision.
This should work well for Google. (Says the person who asked if google.com free email would be available soon!) =)
Re:Helping with the death of weblogging. (Score:2)
(http://blackholeenterprises.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday March 02 2003, @06:15AM)
I have a few friends and family members who read mine to see what I 've been up to lately. There are a few that I read for the same reasons. I'm certain that you don't give a damn about me or them, but the feeling is mutual. We don't do it for you so piss off.
Re:Ick (Score:1)
(http://www.slaveway.com/)
weB-LOG. Or simply stated a Blog
Are you an idiot or just trolling??
Re:Helping with the death of weblogging. (Score:1)
(http://sodalug.net/ | Last Journal: Monday September 13 2004, @10:03AM)