Slashdot Log In
Linux Firmware For Some 802.11b Access Points
Posted by
timothy
on Fri Jan 18, 2002 10:08 AM
from the now-that-is-a-busybox dept.
from the now-that-is-a-busybox dept.
drwho writes "This just unveiled at the BAWUG meeting tonight: Linux firmware for Access Points. Check this URL for more info. I haven't tried it yet but it looks great!" The upshot is that certain Access Points can be flashed with a stripped-down Linux system, which makes them more flexible than they'd be under the included firmware. There are even some screenshots of a modded access point booting up.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Linux Firmware For Some 802.11b Access Points
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 145 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

2.4.x (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:2.4.x (Score:4, Interesting)
- iptables -A INPUT -s --source-mac [mac address of my allowed devices] -j ACCEPT
Not neccessarily complete or accurate in terms of syntax, but you get the gist. Nothing requiring too much memory usage, but enough to ensure you can limit the use of the access point to trusted devices.iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o [er, whatever the interface is called] -j MASQUERADE
Re:2.4.x (Score:5, Insightful)
IPSec on the access point. Screw WEP!
Re:2.4.x (Score:4, Insightful)
Sweet! (Score:3, Funny)
firewall replacement (Score:5, Insightful)
AirPort (Score:1)
Ciryon
Slogan (Score:5, Funny)
"All your base stations are belong to us"
.. Sense of humor
Mirror of Screenshots (Score:4, Informative)
Finally (Score:3, Informative)
Same Some Bucks? (Score:3, Insightful)
Great (Score:2)
(I have the SMC ezconnect 2652 AP)
The site is getting slower and slower so I may have to wait until next week before I find out
I also wonder how much WEP it supports
Woohoo! (Score:1, Flamebait)
FAQ and SS mirror (Score:2, Redundant)
SS1: http://draco.meatbarn.com/OpenAP/screenshot_boot_1 .jpg [meatbarn.com] 1 .jpg [meatbarn.com] 1 .jpg [meatbarn.com]
SS2: http://draco.meatbarn.com/OpenAP/screenshot_boot_
SS3: http://draco.meatbarn.com/OpenAP/screenshot_boot_
Slasdotted (Score:1, Redundant)
Hmm, security? (Score:5, Interesting)
After the initial install with the SRAM card the access point can be upgraded over the network.
Does that mean the vendors of access points do not write protect the operating system on the hardware level? Or are future modifications only possible when the jumper remains in the upgrade position? If the jumper becomes meaningless after the upgrade, its implementation is a serious design flaw and an undetected rooting waiting to happen.
NoCatAuth (Score:1)
-Aaron
Hardware (Score:4, Informative)
( ref: http://opensource.instant802.com/hardware.php )
Tested: US Robotics 2450, SMC EZconnect 2652W
Time to buy an SMC for me
How are they doing bridging? (Score:2)
AFAIK, the bridging code is loaded to the PCMCIA card each boot. Did they manage to keep the file and just replay it or did they reverse-engineer the bridging code?
Not that I am really concerned, bridging a wireless LAN to your wired LAN is bad news unless there is zero need for security (aka my home).
Re:How are they doing bridging? (Score:4, Informative)
If the card is based on the Prism chipset, there's already a Linux driver that will operate the card in Host AP mode by implementing some of the functions normally present in the access point's Infrastructure mode in user space. Other things are handled by the card.
For example, the card itself will handle time-dependent functions like beacon-sending. And it will handle hardware-dependent functions like WEP encrypt-decrypt (optionally). But the association table and all the rest of the functions are part of user space.
Incidentally, you don't need the Host AP driver for your Wireless card to operate a bridged network. Oddly enough, the bridge code in the Linux kernel functions just fine with a wireless card in Peer-to-Peer mode -- it is, after all, just another interface to the kernel itself. What you won't get in peer to peer is sophisticated association handling -- that means that the signal strength meter in your wireless tools won't work exactly right in most commercial packages.
Can I use this to turn my old notebook into an AP? (Score:2, Interesting)
a driver for prism2 cards which works well enough, but lacks roaming support and in the latest version
WEP doesn't seem to work.
I had been looking for AP software under Linux, but the prism2 card combined with bridging in the kernel
was all I could find. It works, but could be better.
So, the question is, if I could use this to turn an old notebook into something more usefull. And,
if so, why has it only been announced as Linux for certain AP hardware.
Security (Score:1)
PC104 Bus on there? Think of the potential. (Score:1)
Repeater? (Score:3, Insightful)
You can build an AP on a PC: (Score:4, Informative)
http://people.ssh.com/jkm/Prism2/
Bridging software: http://bridge.sourceforge.net
Use serial port for modem backup? (Score:4, Interesting)
Why wireless? (Score:1)
I turn off my linux firewall every night, but
a small device checking it's heartbeat [slashdot.org] on the serial console could make it look like a 99.9999 system...
base station / stereo component question (Score:1)
Spare me. (Score:1)
Linux on apple airports (Score:1)
http://www-hft.ee.tu-berlin.de/~strauman/airpor
pretty cool
nocat (Score:1)
http://nocat.net/
Linux for the Airport (Score:3, Informative)
Re:802.11b ? (Score:1)
Re:802.11b ? (Score:3, Informative)
Nokia Wireless LAN [nokia.com]
I'm using (Nokia) 802.11b for all my home stuff now. No more cables running across the floor (This is really a wife pleaser
Re:Airport Killer!! (Score:2)
Why would I run this linux thing over the OS that's already on the Airport, an OS that's specifically designed for this operation.
Re:So? (Score:2, Funny)
You know, that could really put the "panic" back in "kernel panic".
Re:802.11b ? (Score:2, Informative)
http://pasadena.net/vacation/
Re:802.11b ? (Score:1, Informative)
http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.11.html [ieee.org]
Most of the rest of the information around the 'net just paraphrases or simplifies the content from this document. Check this out for the real meat.