Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Giant Airships to Deploy Buildings by 2003

Posted by michael on Sat Jun 09, 2001 07:33 AM
from the sandworms-can't-get-you dept.
UniDyne writes: "CargoLifter, an airship manufacturer based in Germany, plans to build giant-sized airships to drop modular buildings in remote areas and help with disaster relief. These airships are the size of the largest building in my home city: the NationsBank Headquarters here in Charlotte! This article explains the possible uses of these airships and how CargoLifter plans to build a manufacturing hangar in North Carolina. They kind of remind me of something you'd see in an anime series." Mmmmm, CargoLifter.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • airships deploying buildings? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @03:44AM
  • No more hydrogen? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:00AM
  • Never Gonna Happen (Score:3)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:49AM (#164589)
    I was senior crew on the worlds largest and most successfull airship company in the world. I have seen these far-fetched ideas for airships come and go over the years, and NOT ONE has materialized. NOT ONE!!! The airship has only been viable and only will be viable as an advertising platform. Advertising is the only market that has turned a profit in the airship world. While some of the ideas that have come and gone over the years have been good, for one reason or another, the only ones that succeed are those based on arial advertising. Trust me, I know.
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by davie (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:32AM
  • Re:Priorities by RealUlli (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @06:49AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by RealUlli (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @07:04AM
  • Re:One thing made no sense by Plutor (Score:1) Monday June 11 2001, @06:11AM
  • Re:blimp habits by peter (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @06:52PM
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by Zigurd (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @12:03PM
  • You mean like this by Vermifax (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:09AM
  • Re:Hindenburg Uncertainty Principle. by cpt kangarooski (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @02:04PM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by armb (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @11:54PM
  • Meanwhile, here in eastern North Carolina by unitron (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:59PM
  • .. hmm nothing compared to Russia by Crouchy (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:48AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by FFFish (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:08AM
  • Re:Incredible load by FFFish (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:11AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by FFFish (Score:2) Sunday June 10 2001, @07:43AM
  • Nation's bank? by LWolenczak (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:27AM
  • Re:No more hydrogen? by KyleCordes (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:23AM
  • The online implications of this? by falser (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:47AM
  • Re:.. hmm nothing compared to Russia by Loligo (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:08AM
  • Re:Just so long as they don't. . . by moorewr (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @11:59AM
  • Re:Airships, the long awaited by moorewr (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @12:06PM
  • Re:Even if there is a helium shortage... by moorewr (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @12:16PM
  • How (Score:3)

    by tsa (15680) on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:48AM (#164611) Homepage
    How do they connect the building to the blimp? How do they keep the blimp stationary while placing the building on its destined site? And how do they diconnect the building? I can imagine the blimp will go up like a cork once the building is disconnected.
  • Re:Just so long as they don't. . . by Teferi (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @11:21AM
  • Re:How about deploying buildings on the moon or Ma by Teferi (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @11:24AM
  • Caution (Score:3)

    by sharkey (16670) on Saturday June 09 2001, @04:27AM (#164614)
    Sure, it sounds good now, but how long will it be until we have Frogstar fighters picking up buildings at will just because they want someone who is inside?

    --
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by e-gold (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:31AM
  • LAN Party by macdaddy (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:54AM
  • Re:suits me fine by ncc74656 (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @12:11PM
  • Whatever happened to Zeppelin AG? by jcr (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:53AM
  • Ah, here it is! by jcr (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:59AM
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by jcr (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:09AM
  • Re:blimp habits by Velox_SwiftFox (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @08:42PM
  • Re:nonsense by Velox_SwiftFox (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @09:50AM
  • Re:blimp habits by Velox_SwiftFox (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @10:41AM
  • blimp habits (Score:3)

    by Velox_SwiftFox (57902) on Saturday June 09 2001, @04:08AM (#164624)
    Although blimps are certainly an attractive idea for unmanned armed forces surveillance balloons, lifting logs out of areas where sustainable lumbering is being done but roads are impractical or undesirable, and other applications where they can be tethered to the ground as well as their cargo, they are notoriously prone to being damaged or destroyed by unforseen winds and weather conditions, or simply thrown out of control and blown away.

    There are good reasons why they are not used for passenger or military service otherwise, repeated attempts to use them have resulted in loss of the airships and their crews, for reasons totally unrelated to the Hindenberg - Bringing up their relative nonflammability is largely a straw-man argument in their favor.

    Yes, they can be made to work in average weather and winds - but expecting this to keep them safe is about as intelligent as expecting building a seaside house at the same level as the average high tide and expecting it to therefore stay dry - and tides are considerably more predictable than sudden changes in the weather.

    Pardon me, but I would greatly prefer these potential juggernauts to stay downwind of wherever I am when loaded down with the buildings, locomotives, et cetra the article envisions - if at all, considering again that the wind direction may change.

  • Re:hm. by Arjuna (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @06:24AM
  • Wake up - it has happened by fnj (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @01:39PM
  • Fast Food Drop Testing... by wowbagger (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:53AM
  • Re:No more hydrogen? by Yokaze (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:09AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by Tymanthius (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:39AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by Tymanthius (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:29AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by Tymanthius (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:45AM
  • Or even.... by Churchill (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:49AM
  • Possible dangers of airships by Ukab the Great (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:55AM
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by cybercuzco (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:10AM
  • Re:How by SilverSun (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:38AM
  • Re:Hindenburg Uncertainty Principle. by Catbeller (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:32AM
  • Airships, the long awaited by Catbeller (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:21AM
  • Final Fantasy by Velex (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @01:06PM
  • Fuller by Animats (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:17AM
  • Priorities (Score:4)

    by Animats (122034) on Saturday June 09 2001, @08:24AM (#164640) Homepage
    The CargoLifter web site resembles a dot-com with too much venture capital and a bad business concept. The product isn't ready, but the theme park and the visitor's center are open. They have seven locations and twelve business units. They did all the irrelevant stuff first.

    If they had one medium-sized airship ferrying around bulky medium-weight stuff like drilling rigs and transmission towers, and real customers using it, it would be a better company.

  • Their offload procedure... by Valdez (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @02:28PM
  • Re:How about deploying buildings on the moon or Ma by Salsaman (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @11:51AM
  • Re:DAX ~= Dow by mmkhd (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @01:31PM
  • by mmkhd (142113) on Saturday June 09 2001, @04:57AM (#164644)
    I have read a lot of dismissive comments about cargolifter here. And it is true that they face a lot of technical difficulties.

    But they are very serious about building this keeled airship (not a blimp, not a zeppelin).

    They have build the production facilty in Germany, an incredibly big hangar. They do have lots of investors, many of them companies that will benefit from the finished product.

    Yes their stock is slumping, but that is no wonder in the current climate at the stock exchanges, it _is_ a very risky venture.

    But this is not some crazy venture, von Gablenz is going about it in a very level headed way. When they premiered on the stock market during the bubble, they did not go to the "Neuer Markt" where the bubble economy was rampant. They went into the MDAX. The DAX is Germany's equivalent of the Dow, the MDAX holds the next 100 smaller companies (not small caps, more like middle caps, damn my restriceted vocabulary). This means that they are very interested in a steady, level headed developement of Cargolifter, instead of making big bucks fast.

    To sum it up: Cargolifter is a risky, crazy thing, but they are very sure of accomplishing this technological feat. The already have funding up to the finished full scale operating prototype (their estimates).

    So watch out! If it can be done, their doing it. It is incredibly interesting technology and it will be fun to watch how they are going to do it. Their web site holds a lot of information and many good pictures of side projects and the big hangar. http://www.cargolifter.com

    Marcus
  • Just so long as they don't. . . by kfg (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:19AM
  • by NevDull (170554) on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:44AM (#164646) Homepage Journal
    Wired ran a much more in-depth article about this last August [wired.com]. It also discussed worldwide helium shortages which may come about because of such increased demand.

    -Nev
  • by sfstich (173141) on Saturday June 09 2001, @04:07AM (#164647)
    But have any of those other projects had a 400 M$ budget.

    The company seems to be quite determined, so if they can find a decent solution for the two obvious problems (wind and getting the thing certified by the state governments), there probably would be some market for them to tap. (It's at the moment incredibly hard and to transport very bulky freight).

    But as the stock price [comdirect.de] shows, quite a lot of people don't think they will be successful anymore.

    --
    This signature has been deprecated...

  • DAX != Dow by Scareduck (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @02:21AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by oingoboingo (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:15AM
  • Biggest attraction by Alien54 (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:51AM
  • by fantom_winter (194762) on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:46AM (#164651)
    A German company is making plans to build huge dirigibles capable of picking up already-assembled fast-food restaurants, locomotives, even fully equipped hospitals and setting them down in villages with no roads or in big cities tangled in traffic or in Third World settlements recovering from disaster.

    Hmm.. sounds like a wonderful target for a scud missile.

    Or maybe just a good way to perform McDonalds Drop Testing. Hmm.. Science project, anyone?

  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by Blancmange (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:48AM
  • Re:How by Blancmange (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:18AM
  • Re:How by Blancmange (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:56AM
  • Re:Airships in combat by Blancmange (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:37AM
  • by martyb (196687) on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:53AM (#164656)

    Here's a link to the company [cargolifter.com]'s info on the CL160 airship: http://www.cargolifter.com/2001/content/solution_e /index-160.htm [cargolifter.com]

    Additional info on the company and its other products, etc. can be found here: http://www.cargolifter.com/2001/repository/portal_ noscript_e.html [cargolifter.com]. There are even links to a theme park!

  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by beowulfshaeffer (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @11:39AM
  • Re:Caution by SmellMyTeenSpirit (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:32AM
  • hm. (Score:3)

    by SmellMyTeenSpirit (207288) on Saturday June 09 2001, @03:51AM (#164659) Journal
    Buckminster Fuller had some idea akin to this. His plan was to mass produce his Dymaxion Houses and airlift them by zeppelin to where ever. I can't find an exact refrence to this, but I know I read it somewhere. Here's a good Buckminster Fuller page. http://www.cjfearnley.com/fuller-faq.html
  • Re:Wired Article - Much more in-depth by dnh (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @03:12PM
  • Re:Hindenburg Uncertainty Principle. by dnh (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @03:16PM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by dnh (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @03:56PM
  • Re:How by euangray (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:48AM
  • Oh, the Humanity! by Bender Unit 22 (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:53AM
  • Re:blimp habits by Weh (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:55AM
  • Re:No more hydrogen? by vacamike (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:14AM
  • Re:How by Kraft (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @12:57PM
  • move on demand by hyrdra (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:47AM
  • What if.... by suwain_2 (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:01AM
  • Re:Never Gonna Happen by Zandru (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:58AM
  • Airships WILL Return by moosesocks (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @03:37AM
  • Re:How by Sven Tuerpe (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:57AM
  • Re:How by MrDolby (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:13AM
  • This century in flight. -or- Significant digits by MulluskO (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:52AM
  • One thing made no sense by freeweed (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:02AM
  • Re:Their offload procedure... by Konovalev (Score:1) Monday June 11 2001, @04:54AM
  • For those who doubt it would work... by claud9999 (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:58PM
  • Re:How by Professor J Frink (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @08:06AM
  • Airships in combat by Punikki (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:36AM
  • Hmm.... by Punikki (Score:1) Sunday June 10 2001, @12:01AM
  • Re:Incredible load by 6EQUJ5 (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:58AM
  • Incredible load by 6EQUJ5 (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @04:25AM
  • Right of way by $hotgun (Score:1) Monday June 11 2001, @05:41AM
  • Airship cities by viva1917 (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @02:09PM
  • Buckminster Fuller's Idea by sirosi (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @06:53PM
  • Oh yah, Go Airships! by ColGraff (Score:2) Saturday June 09 2001, @07:07AM
  • suits me fine by ramb0z0 (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @05:18AM
(1) | 2