Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Iridium Offers Data service - IRC From Anywhere!

Posted by timothy on Tue Jun 05, 2001 08:40 PM
from the thresholds-and-preferences dept.
quadra writes: "Iridium is now offering satellite data services. For the first time, dial-up and direct internet applications are available anywhere on the planet. Using a data kit attached to an Iridium phone you can either dial up a modem, or use direct internet connectivity. Speeds are rather modest (9600bps) but there's plenty of applications where that'd suffice." OK. I would happily pay $300 / month even for 9.6kbps, if it was unmetered -- I could ride my BikeE the world around with a headmounted display, a twiddler, and a solar-charged laptop in the cargo bin. But prices are hard to find on the Iridium website, which means I can't afford it.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • Dwarves by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:48PM
  • Only 'UPTO' 10 Kb/s by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:00PM
  • Re:Pricing? (Score:4)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:43PM (#173475)
    Phone : $895-1495
    Activation: $50
    Monthly just-because fee: $19.99 to $289 (0 - 250 minutes included)
    Per-minute .99 to .49 (Promotional limited fee)
    Per "data transmission" $1.09
    anyway, one provider isn't afraid to quote prices online. You sort it out:

    http://www.rentexpress.com/iridium/iridium_us_in.h tml [rentexpress.com]

  • wait... by Wakko Warner (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:47PM
  • Re:1s ping: They should be able to do better than by jandrese (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @03:32AM
  • Re:So is my stock still good? by jandrese (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @07:58AM
  • by jandrese (485) <kensama@vt.edu> on Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:06PM (#173479) Homepage Journal
    The article is wrong, Iridium DID offer some data services (they were pretty much still in development when the company went bankrupt though) that were quite unimpressive. Basically, it was a small dongle that attached to the bottom of the phone with an RS232 port on it that you could hook to a laptop. The phone emulated a fairly bare bones 2400bps modem. Unfortunatly the connection was basically just sending data over the same channel it normally sent digitized voice traffic (which is why people used to sound so tinny on those phones, their voice was being encoded at 2400bps!) which left you with rather high latency (~1 second round trip ping times for instance). Because the handoff wasn't perfected yet with the data traffic (sound worked a lot better) you would frequntly be disconnected after 8-15 minutes or so. Honestly, it wasn't fast or reliable enough to run pine over, although it was OK for ftping a mail spool file and opening it locally. Any sort of realtime interactive game is out of the question, and really anything online other than quick email or light web browsing (we had a little program that would proxy the web for us and compress the pages down for transmission over the satellite).

    There is some good news though. The service is a lot better if you get out of the city (driving down 81 I was able to keep the connection running for nearly 20 minutes once) and it does work EVERYWHERE. Finally, you do get better data rates with this than many (most) other commerically avilable satellite services (ComTech (~24 bytes a second, several second latency), OmniTracs (~7-8 bytes a second, several minute latency), and others).

    Next time you need to check your email in the middle of Africa, you will thank your lucky stars that Iridium exists though, since your choices are the cheap-by-satellite-comms standards Iridium, or a much heavier much bulkier much much more expensive satellite solution.

    Down that path lies madness. On the other hand, the road to hell is paved with melting snowballs.
  • Re:NOT "anywhere on the planet" by quadra (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @06:29AM
  • Re:Pricing? (Score:3)

    by sphealey (2855) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:52PM (#173481)
    Ah, but the current incarnation of Iridium wrote off the development and construction costs, so they need only charge for the operations costs plus profit. I am guessing still not inexpensive, but it doesn't have to be the $5/minute of the earlier attempt.

    sPh
  • Holographic Display? by cnvogel (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @11:00PM
  • Re:Nice, but hardly new by Ben Hutchings (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:41PM
  • by Ben Hutchings (4651) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:33PM (#173484) Homepage

    Read the Iridium service details carefully. The 'data service' (data calls to anywhere, presumably converted to standard modem protocols at the PSTN gateway) 'offers a data rate of up to 2.4 Kbps', which is the figure I recall from previously reading about Iridium.

    The 'Internet data service' (which appears to mean using Iridium as your ISP) 'utilizes transparent compression, resulting in a data rate of up to 10 Kbps, depending on content' (my emphasis). So no, Iridium didn't suddenly get faster or start supporting channel bonding. I suspect that the standard data service probably includes such compression too, but the marketing department just forgot to include this misleading statement in its description. This does not turn a 2400 bps connection through Iridium into a 10 kbps connection any more than MNP5 (included in any ordinary modem) turns your 50 kbps connection through the PSTN into a 200 kbps connection.

  • Re:I hope it's better now. by Kha0S (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @03:15AM
  • Re:some would say by esper (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @08:02AM
  • Re:Access from anywhere by Cheeze (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:19PM
  • Wow. by Pope Slackman (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @06:58AM
  • Re:Wow. by Pope Slackman (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @04:07PM
  • Re:Wow. by Pope Slackman (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @10:26PM
  • Re:some would say by griffjon (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:10PM
  • Re:Nice, but hardly new by NMerriam (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:29AM
  • Re:Nice, but hardly new by NMerriam (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:33AM
  • by NMerriam (15122) <NMerriam@artboy.org> on Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:41PM (#173494) Homepage
    This is by far not the first commercial satellite data access, by any criteria.

    It may wind up being less expensive (as the initial costs were all lost), but you can do 9600 on a Globalstar (they're talking about a 30k+, not sure if thats working now or later) and 64k/channel on InMarsat (has been working for years).

    InMarsat can mux together multiple 64k channels to give 128k+ IP access from anywhere on earth. it's not the cheapest way to check your email (at $30+ per minute for a 128k connection) but for remote field work there's not a lot of alternatives.

    We haven't used any Iridium services, but if the Globalstar phones are any indication (and they should be, as its a pretty similar system) the biggest difficulty is keeping the antenna on a satellite. You can lose a connection very easily, and with data just getting extra noise or interference is a lot more of a pain than having the audio from a call drop out for a half-second.

    Once you add dishes to the equation (to get around losing calls from moving the phone) you're basically back to using a larger (but still portable) InMarSat system. If they can come up with a decent dish setup that runs off of batteries for more than 20 minutes of connect time, Iridium would have something novel to offer.

    As it stands, the only thing Iridium is bringing to the table is the potential for lower costs through competition (I'm not complaining -- that's plenty for me!)

    ---------------------------------------------
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by alienmole (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @11:47AM
  • Re:Not kiloBYTES... it's kiloBITS... by mindstrm (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:59AM
  • Re:Pricing? by Pahroza (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:52PM
  • Pricing? (Score:4)

    by Pahroza (24427) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:49PM (#173498)
    According to this [iridium.com] page, you have to contact one of their service providers to find out if there's an additional charge. Being that their prices in general are pretty f'ing high, I wouldn't be surprised it doubled the cost per month. Just a g
  • You already can! (Score:3)

    by Baloo Ursidae (29355) <baloo@ursine.ca> on Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:19PM (#173499) Homepage Journal
    I would happily pay $300 / month even for 9.6kbps

    With AOL's well known idea of speed and thier new pricing plan, you can!

    --

  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by dead_penguin (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:22PM
  • NOT "anywhere on the planet" by CSC (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @10:25PM
  • Re:some would say by Znork (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @01:55AM
  • Expensive by Znork (Score:2) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:12AM
  • Re:This is great for field scientists and engineer by jmauro (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:32PM
  • I am really sick of Quake by jfunk (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:06PM
  • Re:I am really sick of telemetry by jfunk (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @09:42PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by miahrogers (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:53PM
  • a real bent ... by timothy (Score:1) Saturday June 09 2001, @02:34PM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by timothy (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:19PM
  • Numbers by The Silicon Sorceror (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:09PM
  • Re:Numbers by The Silicon Sorceror (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:43AM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by Egotistical Rant (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @10:10PM
  • I am really sick of telemetry by redhotchil (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:44PM
  • 1s ping: They should be able to do better than tha by cyberdonny (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @10:21PM
  • Re:Only 'UPTO' 10 Kb/s by isdnip (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:39PM
  • Re:some would say by QuantumG (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:37PM
  • Re:some would say by QuantumG (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @09:02PM
  • Re:some would say by QuantumG (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @08:07PM
  • Re:some would say by QuantumG (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:21PM
  • Didn't the US Navy get an exclusive? by jcr (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:26PM
  • Re:Nice, but hardly new by sirkin (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:55AM
  • Imagine being an archaeologist, geologist, paleontologist or land surveyor. Now you can instantly file field reports with your colleagues at home or even archive them into one's own home or office database for safekeeping and later retrieval. It think this will be invaluable to many. The revolution continues.
  • Very old news (Score:3)

    by mattr (78516) <mattr.telebody@com> on Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:28PM (#173523) Homepage Journal
    Iridium has had/promised this data service for years. Isn't this beating a dead horse?

    I researched this 9600 bps option for Cambodian community infrastructure.. but even with two of the Iridium investors being close to the leader of this project we still didn't buy into it.

    They've been saying the same thing about how this fills a need for a long time, but other companies have also provided satellite data services for a long time.

    You need a purchase case for a mobile phone or terminal. Doesn't compute unless maybe you're in the military.. or they have dropped prices from orbit.

  • Re:Pricing? by fougasse (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:40PM
  • Re:Not kiloBYTES... it's kiloBITS... by big_hairy_mama (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:04PM
  • Re:wait... by dgb2n (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:40AM
  • Re:some would say by Noer (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:59PM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by dchamp (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @09:28PM
  • Re:Didn't the US Navy get an exclusive? by polymath69 (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:52PM
  • Access from anywhere by Kreeblah (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:53PM
  • Re:Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? by cybercuzco (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:12PM
  • Re:Access from anywhere by michael.creasy (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:22PM
  • Just Stay Out of My Way by Cheshire Cat (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @06:19AM
  • Re:IRC From Anywhere? by The_Messenger (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @10:02PM
  • some would say by havardi (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:50PM
  • Re:Access from anywhere by snookerdoodle (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @05:50AM
  • Re:Pirate Communication by regen (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:06AM
  • *actual* prices for iridium service by blintz (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @08:02PM
  • $300 for 9600kbps? (Score:4)

    by small_dick (127697) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:37PM (#173539)
    Geezus, Timothy, I think Taco may be paying you too much.


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
  • Doh! They can just disable your number. by TheLink (Score:1) Thursday June 07 2001, @02:01AM
  • Re:Nice, but hardly new by enneff (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @09:07PM
  • Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? by Tassach (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:40PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by Tassach (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:54PM
  • Re:Haven't they splashed those damn birds yet? by Tassach (Score:2) Friday June 08 2001, @06:39AM
  • Cool! by tcc (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:51PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by tcc (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:54PM
  • Is the phone realy needed? by Faux_Pseudo (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:51PM
  • a/s/l by Salsaman (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @11:14PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by electricmonk (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:10PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by Alien54 (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:23PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by Gordonjcp (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @01:46AM
  • Re:Is the phone realy needed? by stylewagon (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:08PM
  • Driving is already bad enough as it is! :-) by JosephMast (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:36PM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by jchristopher (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:27PM
  • Re:Just Stay Out of My Way by jchristopher (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:29PM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by jchristopher (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:33PM
  • Re:Wow. by jchristopher (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:36PM
  • Re:Wow. by jchristopher (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @08:56PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by isorox (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:41PM
  • Re:Pricing? by PinkyAndThaBrain (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:26PM
  • Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by Rosco P. Coltrane (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:51PM
  • Um these guys have their terms confused... by NNKK (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @02:36AM
  • BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by bikepunk (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:56PM
  • Sounds cool by Traicovn (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:55PM
  • Re:Sounds cool by Traicovn (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:06PM
  • IRC From Anywhere? by Johnny Starrock (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:54PM
  • Re:Why I like this by jonsuen (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @08:15PM
  • New summer job. by jonsuen (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @08:32PM
  • Already done (sort of) by jonsuen (Score:2) Tuesday June 05 2001, @08:06PM
  • Re:some would say by modemboy (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:07PM
  • by localroger (258128) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @04:58PM (#173571) Homepage
    The Iridium sats are in Low Earth Orbit so that they can get sufficient signal strength for a handheld device to connect. This means that the arctic regions are covered, and also that the network needs a lot of satellites -- which it has. Ping time is probably not good compared to landlinks but is nowhere near the delay you'd expect from geosynchronous.
  • So is my stock still good? by serutan (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @11:14PM
  • Somehow "bought" isn't the right word by serutan (Score:1) Monday June 11 2001, @11:32AM
  • Re:Pirate Communication by tristan f. (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:31PM
  • Re:BIKING GEEKS UNITE!!! :) by tristan f. (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:34PM
  • Re:Not first, but a good one nonetheless! by tristan f. (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @06:37PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by agallagh42 (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:28PM
  • Pricing by gmanske (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @08:47PM
  • Re:Dwarves by number one duck (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:11PM
  • Re:some would say by number one duck (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:13PM
  • Re:some would say by number one duck (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:23PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by MacGod (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:16PM
  • Re:Slow speed but also horrendous ping time by MacGod (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:41PM
  • Are you sure it's 9600? by GreyPoopon (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @12:19AM
  • IRCing with a phone by an ominous cow ward (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @07:07PM
  • Re:Already done (sort of) by Ratbert42 (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @04:41AM
  • Re:Pirate Communication by Ratbert42 (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @04:46AM
  • by Zen Mastuh (456254) on Tuesday June 05 2001, @05:37PM (#173588)

    I have heard of pirate radio stations that operate like this: A van loaded with a transmitter and other broadcasting equipment drives around a small area, say a few square miles. The F.C.C. always has a hard-on to catch these guys.

    When the current incarnation of Iridium declares bankruptcy and threatens a satellite storm and is bailed out by the government and sold for pennies on the dollar, the new owners will be able to implement significantly higher transmission rates and sell the service at a bargain. People who pirate tunez, warez, or pr0n could locate themselves in a dense urban area, say NYC, and cruise around on a bike or on foot, broadcasting anything. The F.C.C. guys would be able to get GPS coordinates for the location, but if you factor in the error and the population density, it would be practically impossible to locate the perpetrator.

    People tend to think technology will be used to enslave us, but here is a case of technology increasing liberty.

  • Re:You already can! by _Anadin_ (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @11:14PM
  • someone did by Papa Don't Preach (Score:1) Tuesday June 05 2001, @11:41PM
  • Shameless self-promotion by Bob_GS (Score:1) Wednesday June 06 2001, @06:36AM
(1) | 2