Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashback: Bricks, Consoles, Projects

Posted by timothy on Tue Nov 28, 2000 06:59 PM
from the blueberry-defeats-apple-film-at-11 dept.
More Lego Sculptures! More game collections going to the highest bidder! More ... P4 benchmarks. Updates below to recent Slashdot stories, and a few tangents not yet here explored. Go crazy!

Ma'am, I'm afraid that Ritalin by itself won't help in this case. Somehow this email from Lego madman (insomniac?) Eric Harshbarger ended up in Hemos's hands, and it's hard to resist. Here he confirms the suspicions of a number of Slashdot readers who looked closely at his previous efforts featured on these pages.

Well, A few weeks ago when I announced my LEGO Mona Lisa, a few folks from Slashdot.org noticed the lower half of a statue ... and some guessed what my next project announcement would be. I've now finally completed a
statue of 'San' from the Japanese Animation film Princess Mononoke.

I wrote quite a lot about this model ... and took many, many pictures, so I hope you enjoy browsing.

I also recently finished a much smaller model of the BSD Daemon mascot.

cheers,

eric

Enough already! crizh writes "Anyone interested in another arguement about the merits of the P4 and whether Tom Pabst is biased against Intel/AMD might want to check out the further update he posted on P4/MPEG4 this morning."

Further submissions in this category must be accompanied by sizeable bribes or at least juicy blackmail. Let's see what people think of the P4 vs. whatever Athon variety is cool in 12 months from now and talk about it again then;)

Sore thumbs, perhaps. An unnamed correspondent points out this enormous videogame auction, venturing as he does so: "Seems to be as big if not bigger than the previous one posted."

I dunno about that, but it sure is a lot of games. Is everyone dumping their consoles to spend the proceeds on exotic vacations, or what?

fuuzy math for a new era Erik Inge Bolsø writes "Earlier this year, slashdot had a scoop about a 1990 and 1995 study called fuzz, which tested the quality of UNIX utilities.

In july this year, a followup study was published, in which they did subject a collection of common apps on Windows NT (and 2000) to the same tests. The results are interesting... Full paper available here."

Brother, can you spare some time? swgill writes "After reading about Microsoft's attempt to reach beginner programmers with free copies of Visual C++ for schools I thought about the main problem that was found: Visual C++ and the related teaching material is all based on the Windows API, and algorithms are treated as secondary as best. I am actually in college in England doing an A-level in Computing where I can see the effects of this educational policy (although we use VB6 instead of VC++6). I have decided to found the libteach project at sourceforge. The idea is to prevent people learning to program in school from being forced to relearn their skills when Micro$oft switches focus again and to also give them an idea of programming for another type of system (RT-Linux anyone?)."

Sounds like a worthy project, albeit for now still in the planning stages. Of course, it's helped by the fact that there are several Open Source OSes chock full of programming languages out there, but not by the lack of decent IDEs available for them.

Update The latest in our Hellmouth Revisited series is now online .

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Slashback: Bricks | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 104 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • by Brian Stretch (5304) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:43PM (#595126) Homepage
    http://www.amdzone.com/flask.cfm

    Athlon-optimized FlaskMPEG on a 1.2GHz DDR Athlon board now outguns Intel's P4 optimized version, with more improvements to come.
  • Re:Grandfather clock by sunryder (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:45PM
  • Blame by ukyoCE (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:45PM
  • Lego BSD guy... by bsDaemon (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:48PM
  • Re:Non PS version of the fuzz paper? by 1010011010 (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:49PM
  • Univ of MD still clean by strredwolf (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:58PM
  • Just to be fair... by 2nd Post! (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:55PM
  • The reason behind the vg auctions... by Vlail (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:56PM
  • by iCEBaLM (34905) <icebalm&icebalm,com> on Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:58PM (#595134)
    I'm actually a student taking a C++ class in school, and if it weren't for microsoft providing the materials, quite frankly, my school would have no computer department. period.

    Too bad this isn't true. GCC works just fine as a C++ compiler, that's a lot of the cost right there. Now for information what exactly does MS provide? Visual C++ Manuals? Look up crap like that on the net, you can find all kinds of C/C++ tutorials, documentation and information teachers can use.

    -- iCEBaLM
  • Re:Athlon back in the lead! (link) by Elendur (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @05:01PM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by Doug Merritt (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:00PM
  • my favorite quote... by Phexro (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @05:12PM
  • Re:Athlon back in the lead! (link) by conform (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @05:13PM
  • Re:Fuzz by woggo (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @05:30PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Trepidity (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @05:49PM
  • Re:prosecute MS as drug dealers! by Hard_Code (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @04:38AM
  • Speaking of VC++ by Gondola (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @05:02AM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by John_Prophet (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @05:08AM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by Tyriphobe (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:visual c++ by ekidder (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @06:12AM
  • Re:Best quote from Fuzz by ekidder (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @06:20AM
  • Why Can't We All Get Along? Just Like These Guys! by EXTomar (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @06:55AM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by jejones (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:49PM
  • IS there a C++? by mangu (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:50PM
  • Lego Prices by NetJunkie (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:53PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Christ-0-Geek (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:56PM
  • by wnissen (59924) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:58PM (#595152)
    And Microsoft also is willing to cheapyly site-license this stuff to colleges and universities that have the money to pay full price. This is not charity. Most colleges are not so strapped for cash that they couldn't pay for MS Office just like a regular corporation. They could afford to go to a Unix based solution like Framemaker, but MS wants itself to be established as the standard computing platform everywhere. So, MS offers site-licenses really cheap in order to indoctrinate the students into thinking that everyone uses MS.

    This is the same policy that Apple uses, so I am not singling MS out as particularly bad. No company does this as charity.

    Walt
  • Re:visual c++ by jsmaby (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:12PM
  • proprietary APIs? by cpeterso (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:02PM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by Tyriphobe (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:05PM
  • Interesting auction by themushroom (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:07PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Doug Merritt (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:09PM
  • by signe (64498) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:09PM (#595158) Homepage
    Anyone else find it interesting that the "high" bid on the first auction was exactly $75k, which happened to also be the reserve, and was placed by the person who was selling the second auction (simpsonseller). And then his bid on the first auction gets cancelled saying that he didn't think anyone had 75k to spend on games (which sounds more like something the seller would say), and then the first auction immediately gets cancelled. And the second auction gets cancelled at the same time.

    Like a lot of people called it, looks like it was fake from the start.

    -Todd

    ---
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Captain Derivative (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @06:10PM
  • Re:Huh? by Doug Merritt (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:17PM
  • Re:Fuzz by stripes (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @06:13PM
  • Re:Fuzz (Score:3)

    by woggo (11781) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:20PM (#595162) Journal
    The 1995 version of the paper was never actually published. Nevertheless, it's one of the most popular papers ever published at UW/Madison.

    The SWEng community who were refereeing it wanted to see more stuff about testing methodology, whereas the fuzz tests are incredibly simpleminded in their approach and don't fit in to any of the accepted "testing paradigms". That's not to the tests' discredit at all, though, as what they exposed (the incredible fragility of many common C programs) is absolutely amazing.

    I went to a talk that Prof. Miller gave on fuzz about a month ago, discussing the 2000 NT results. I'd personally be really interested to see where the blame for this lack of robustness lies: the applications, the MFC, or the Win32 API. Unfortunately, there's really no way to do that with such simple testing tools.

    You can see Prof. Miller's fuzz page here [wisc.edu]. Bart Miller is a great professor and researcher; as an aside, you should really check out the Paradyn project [wisc.edu] (which is sadly slightly less well-known than fuzz outside of the scientific computing communities) and its child, the dyninst API [dyninst.org]; the purpose of these projects is to allow alteration and instrumentation of stock binaries.


    ~wog
    My opinions are my own and not those of the research group or the university that I am affiliated with.

  • Re:Fuzz by pb (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @06:29PM
  • way too much time on his hands- but isn't it cool? by ptbrown (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @06:33PM
  • Re:visual c++ by sycorob (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @06:37PM
  • Hmm.. (Score:3)

    by Tom7 (102298) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @08:16PM (#595166) Homepage Journal
    My school uses gcc. It's free.
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by wnissen (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @06:56AM
  • you are too chatty by Frog (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @07:20AM
  • Re:Blame by Bilestoad (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @07:23AM
  • Buying extra legos by SanLouBlues (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:07PM
  • Re:Fuzz by woggo (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @07:48AM
  • legos? (Score:3)

    by fjordboy (169716) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:11PM (#595172) Homepage
    Great..just what I need. I was cruising the site, and my little brother was looking over my shoulder...he saw the legos...and since he is already very into legos, he is going to start doing things like this! Thanks a lot slashdot! Now I have to put up with my little brother making weird time consuming/wasting lego creations and then he will ask me to make a webpage for it!!! I think i need a little more net privacy for reading slashdot!!

  • Re:Fuzz by jovlinger (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @08:23AM
  • Fuzz by pb (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:06PM
  • by Christ-0-Geek (246330) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:12PM (#595175)
    I'm actually a student taking a C++ class in school, and if it weren't for microsoft providing the materials, quite frankly, my school would have no computer department. period. The teachers simply lack the funds and initiative to create a computer department unaided. Trying to villianize MS for being charitable is completely rediculous. It's as though you ran out of bad things they've done, and attempt to twist their virtuous acts into something that sounds as though it promotes your whole irrational anti-microsoft stance.

    Microsoft will probably never become free for everyone or open sourced, but just deal with it. However, when they do provide charity (for FREE) to schools so as to aid in education, you had better respect that.


    -CoG

    "And with HIS stripes we are healed"
  • Re:Speaking of VC++ by marms (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @08:49AM
  • libteach by Kreeblah (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:13PM
  • Auction by retep (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:06PM
  • Re:Best quote from Fuzz by TheRealSlimShady (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @08:51AM
  • Re:IS there a C++? by WillSeattle (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @08:54AM
  • LibTeach and vendor-neutral C++ or C# by WillSeattle (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:07PM
  • suspicious auction by cheeserd00d (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:15PM
  • Does not look like they posted... by StarTux (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:15PM
  • Drug dealers give out free samples,too by Doug Merritt (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:20PM
  • Re:visual c++ by QuantumG (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:23PM
  • Non PS version of the fuzz paper? by Malc (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:28PM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by Christ-0-Geek (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:34PM
  • Re:Drug dealers give out free samples,too by CaptainCarrot (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:32PM
  • Re:Grandfather clock by arnald (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:39PM
  • prosecute MS as drug dealers! by small_dick (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:45PM
  • More than proprietary APIs... by 2nd Post! (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:52PM
  • Re:Fuzz by stripes (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @04:58PM
  • APIs and theory together by breic (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @10:15PM
  • Re:Grandfather clock by Cederic (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @10:21PM
  • Fuzzy by TheRealSlimShady (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @11:33PM
  • Best quote from Fuzz by TheRealSlimShady (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @11:39PM
  • Re:APIs and theory together by Captain Derivative (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @09:12AM
  • Re:Speaking of VC++ by tom's a-cold (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @09:28AM
  • Dumping consoles for exotic vacations? Nah... by Aurel42 (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:17PM
  • AMD started the FSB façade. by AFCArchvile (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:18PM
  • Re:Speaking of VC++ by Gondola (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @10:00AM
  • Hmmm...p.2 by sparty (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:19PM
  • Re:Athlon back in the lead! (link) by conform (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @11:24AM
  • Re:legos? by fantomas (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:19PM
  • Re:Fuzzy Math? by woggo (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @02:39PM
  • Grandfather clock by fishbowl (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:19PM
  • Mirror of Fuzz paper by retep (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:22PM
  • Re:visual c++ by QuantumG (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @04:01PM
  • visual c++ (Score:3)

    by skt (248449) on Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:24PM (#595209)
    Not all classes that teach C++, using the free M$ VC++ compiler, focus on the Windows API. I know someone who is taking a class now and the class focuses on objects and algorithms. The Windows API isn't even mentioned in the class, the only programs they are writing are console win32 apps.

    Of course, the GNU compiler + a text editor + gdb is the best way to learn how to program. Many colleges use it as a teaching tool, so it's good to learn how to use it early so you don't run into it later on, after using the VC++ compiler for a while. The nice thing about this compiler is that it forces you to learn about makefiles, object files, etc. These types of things are hidden from the programmer in a simple VC++ environment.
  • Fuzzy Math? by TheFlu (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:26PM
  • Re:Buying extra legos by rabidcow (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:31PM
  • Re:visual c++ by ekidder (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:38PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Christ-0-Geek (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:39PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by ZeroConcept (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:41PM
  • Re:Reply to the Visual C++ rant: by Cryptnotic (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:43PM
  • Hogwash. by 1010011010 (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @03:43PM
  • Re:Fuzzy by -kyz (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @11:43PM
  • Re:Best quote from Fuzz by -kyz (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @12:14AM
  • Re: all the plural talk about legos. by King of the World (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @12:32AM
  • Re:visual c++ by Vanders (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @02:43AM
  • Re:Fuzz by stripes (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @03:17AM
  • Re:visual c++ by horza (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @04:07AM
  • Re:Fuzz by pb (Score:1) Wednesday November 29 2000, @09:31PM
  • Tools by laslo2 (Score:2) Wednesday November 29 2000, @04:08AM
  • Re:Non PS version of the fuzz paper? by Malc (Score:1) Thursday November 30 2000, @09:31AM
  • Re:Grandfather clock by mrjrogers (Score:1) Tuesday December 05 2000, @02:49PM
  • Mirror of lego by Fjord (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:35PM
  • Re:visual c++ by ekidder (Score:1) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:35PM
  • How about KDevelop? by 31337du0d (Score:2) Tuesday November 28 2000, @02:39PM
(1) | 2