Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment Re:That's what Nokia, Moto, and Microsoft said (Score 1) 535

Agreed, Apple can get away with inferior underpowered hardware because it's "good enough". Cars are based on acceleration, mileage and safety. Throw in number of charge points and charging time for electric. The great gadgets and software in the Tesla don't even get a mention.

Though if Apple do produce a car, expect to see cracked windows on about half of them driving around.


Comment Re:You're all forgetting something..... (Score 1) 213

The Tesla is an incredible car. I love the finishing, the build quality is great as well as the comfort. The screen is killer as is the software. The A4 size map right in front of you is a game-changer, and you can flick the map up onto the dash behind the wheel so you can navigate at the same time as drive through trickier/busier areas. The acceleration is beyond that of my "European" sports car. The styling is very neutral but I personally find it very pretty.

The "big boys" have been left in the dust. The offerings from BMW, Mercedes and Porsche have been pathetic vapourware. Ferrari are toys, all my friends with Ferraris use them as "weekend cars" and have a Bentley for day to day. I am amazed how such profitable companies like the aforementioned have managed to turn into such dinosaurs.


Comment Re:Pity the big auto companies were so blind. (Score 1) 213

Of all the people that go on about the love of the noise and shifting gears, few have them have driven a Tesla. We will end up having two cars. Tesla for every day, and a sports car just for track days (or a run around Nurburgring). Once you have experienced never having to go to a gas station again, it would be hard to go to a petrol car again.

Interesting Amazon TopGear comment though, makes me think ferries and Eurostar should have Tesla chargers built in. A perfect time to recharge.


Comment Re:Sweden's case won't really matter (Score 0) 146

"The UK had no beef in this originally, they were just acting on an EU arrest warrant"

They acted on an invalid EU warrant. They post-fixed the paperwork later when he was in solitary. And why was he unnecessarily put in solitary? There were so many things wrong about the way the UK went about it.

Bail-jumping was a serious thing to do but Assange had weighed up his options. The risk of being executed evidently outweighed being cooped up in a hole for years. He was pretty much screwed either way.


Comment Re:This affects you personally, yes? (Score 1) 146

I don't get your point. What does being a jerk have to do with anything? The guy took on a massively funded secret organisation in the US government that has the ability to assassinate people with no consequences, and put that country back onto the path of accountable democracy. He put the US on the first step of fixing their democracy. Next is their corrupt Senate and system of lobbying, but that's not his battle.


Comment Re:Competent Authorities (Score 0) 146

It's strange you label 90% of the people as "having no fucking clue". Even if they are the silent majority, most people appreciate the work Assange has done. A lot of them are actually quite literate. He has made a lot of sacrifices, ones that most of us would never make. Without Assange, we would never have had Snowdon. There would be no public debate. Just the gradual slide of democratic nations into a police state.

Your knowledge of France, the law, or even the word capitulate, is suspect. I think you have nothing to contribute so should probably shut up.


Comment ISPs may not have the same objective (Score 2) 316

Remember when BT got lambasted as they intercepted all their user's web page requests using Phorm to be able to track users and insert their own ads into web pages? There was a big backlash with everybody saying a web page should be allowed to travel from a web server to a web browser unmolested. It's no surprise they will jump at an excuse to be able to intercept all their users web pages and manipulate the content before it arrives at the web browser. Sets a great precedent for them.

It would be interesting to see transcripts of Cameron's speech as it's hard to believe he is as idiotic as he has been made out to be. His quote that we must "deal with the Internet" doesn't mean anything as radical as a report button on web pages. Though his quote "We must not allow the internet to be an ungoverned space" is bound to make him a hate figure globally online. I've no idea how his PR man let that slip past. "Just because you are online does not mean you are immune from the law" would have been much better.


Comment Probably too late to be seen but... (Score 1) 269

Why does a distributed social network need servers at all? Why not just flag stuff on your PC to share? It gets copied encrypted into a bittorrent directory using a session key, and that session key is held in a wrapper than can only be unencrypted by the people/group you have 'shared' with. The bittorrent network will ensure it's available even when your computer is off. Adding nodes to boost network speed just means pointing some bittorrent client to that .torrent.


Comment Best distro (Score 1) 303

I would say the winners of 2013 would have been Mint and Ubuntu Unity. The former kept up its head of steam from the previous year, and the latter became so polished it was winning over a lots of haters.

In 2014 Unity got shotgunned by insisting on sticking spyware in the desktop by default and veering towards mobile. Definitely the big losers of 2014. KDE came up with their latest distro based on the new QT but lack of polish on the desktop meant they didn't get much traction.

Gnome desktop has probably made the most progress, but screwed themselves by being the best on minority distro Slackware and the most popular distro Ubuntu running an old buggy version.

So I would say the winner would be Mint due to being the only one not to fuck up.


Comment Re: Mozilla is looking for new sources of revenue (Score 1) 106

I have to agree with BarberaHudson. Of course market share is a major factor in how much advertising is worth. Companies also look at growth. When Firefox was expanding with no end in sight then signing an expensive deal would have been worth it for Google: if Firefox became de facto then they had an exclusive deal and captured all the eyeballs, and if their immature project took off and became de facto then... they still had all the eyeballs. Once growth starts tailing off the value of marketing drops.

However the funding had in part to do with the marketing aspect, and secondly to buy their way into creating a level playing field. They were perfectly aware of the Microsoft embrace and extend, and they way they tried to lock business users into IE using ActiveX plugins. A completely open source browser dedicated to open standards getting a majority share of the market would ensure that the market remained wide open and ripe for picking once they had advanced their own browser far enough to complete.

The deal probably will be renegotiated but will it be a lot of pain? Possibly not. If the investment was wisely used, refactoring, quashing most of the memory leaks, boosting the JS engine, etc, then if they "broke the back" of getting a great stable core then perhaps a renegotiated deal will be fine for both parties. Google certainly can't afford for Firefox to go away yet. With Google facing ant-trust cases in various countries, helping "promote choice" is not a bad PR move either. As well as providing yet another alternative to Safari on Apple.

PS - AC fuck off. You are wrong and BarberaHudson is right

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.