Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Netscape Communicator 4.72 Released

Posted by Hemos on Wed Feb 23, 2000 11:46 AM
from the go-out-and-download-it dept.
Quite a number of people have ants in their pants over the latest release of Netscape Communicator. This latest release, 4.72 to be exact, can also be grabbed through their Web site. Here's to hoping it's more stable than my current release. 'Course, Mozilla's getting really really close now...
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Netscape Communicator 4.72 Released | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 369 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4
  • Haven't... by jawad (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:51AM
  • doh! (Score:5)

    by Caspuh (105645) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:54AM (#1250951)
    I was going to post a more insiteful comment, but then Netscape crashed.
  • RPMs? by Robotech_Master (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:54AM
  • Re:Haven't... by rcw-work (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:55AM
  • by SETY (46845) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:56AM (#1250955)
    Mozilla might be getting close for some people, not for me.
    It still has a long way to go. Netscape will crash about once an hour for me when I am doing heavy web browsing.
    My longest Mozilla uptime is 5 minutes. No joke. Slashdot is the only site I can use with it. www.deja.com main page crashes it right away.
    I'm sorry, but Mozilla isn't useable for me. I remember the early Netscape betas years ago and they wer not this unstable.
    And yes I submit bug reports.
    I wish all the mozilla developers good luck, but its a long road ahead to the point where Netscape is replaced.

  • Interesting by slashdot-terminal (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:56AM
  • seems ok, relatively stable by dlc (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:57AM
  • Re:Haven't... by Axiom_D (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:58AM
  • by tjwhaynes (114792) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:58AM (#1250959)

    Yes - I've already downloaded and installed 4.72. Why? Because I'm fed up with having the 4.71 browser flake out every day or so with another error. So far, so good - nothing has died yet :-)

    I've been tracking the Mozilla Seamonkey Milestones since M11, and it seems to be stabilizing up nicely but I'm stuck with using it for browsing behind the firewall at work because we use a SOCKS proxy to the outside world. Alas, as far as I can see this is not supported in Mozilla yet. Anyone have any clues on this one - what is needed to persuade Seamonkey to use the SOCKS proxy? Or does some SOCKS expert wish to sign up for this post on the Mozilla team? It was empty last time I looked.

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    P.S. If I see any posts with the title 'Shoes?' following this one ... :-)

  • Question by ShelbyCobra (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:58AM
  • Re:Haven't... by hey (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:59AM
  • Re:Haven't... by Lxy (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:59AM
  • gifs by grarg (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:00AM
  • Netscape rarely crashes... by Psiren (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:01AM
  • most stable? by nicedream (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:02AM
  • Release notes (Score:5)

    by AT (21754) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:02AM (#1250967)
    The release notes are here [netscape.com].

    Quick summary:
    • Global IME support: users of Windows 95, 98 and NT 4.0 can now download Global IME modules that enable input of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean characters into mail messages and web forms. For more information on using Global IME under communicator, choose International Users from the Help menu. Windows 2000 users should use the fonts and IMEs available on the installation CD. If you're running Windows 98, just select the Windows Update icon in the Start menu. From there, select Product Updates, and download the language support and IMEs you wish to use.
    • User agent support for Windows 2000

  • HOWTO (Score:4)

    by Jikes (123986) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:05AM (#1250969)
    Keep Netscape/Unix From Crashing Like the Overextended Hack Job Piece Of Crap Code It Is - HOWTO

    1) Your distro manufacturer may have packaged netscape incorrectly. See their site for details or upgrades.

    2) Turn off Cascading Style Sheets (Style Sheets) support in your preferences. It generally doesn't work well at all and really isn't all that necessary. And IME it makes NS crash. A lot.

    3) Turn off Java. Turn off Java. Turn off Java.

    4) Turn off Javascript if you don't use somewhat sophisticated sites.

    5) Don't invoke mystery components like Messenger and Composer and all that crap unless you actually need to use them. They tend to suck a bit.

    6) Feed it lots and lots and lots of disk/memory cache, or none at all.

    7) Upgrade. 4.7x is much nicer than previous 4.x releases on all platforms, IME.

    -------------------------

    This is just my experience. With these changes, NS tends to stay up for a few days for me, as opposed to an hour or less previously.

    Take this at well less than face value.

  • Re:Question by grarg (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:05AM
  • Re:too little, too late by Lxy (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:05AM
  • java by kapper (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:06AM
  • Re:Release notes (Score:3)

    by philj (13777) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:06AM (#1250973)
    Don't forget:

    "Netscape Communicator with 128-bit strong encryption is now available worldwide"

    (with the exception of a few countries that
    America hates)

    Saves having to use Fortify instead.
  • Re:RPMs? by arthurs_sidekick (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:07AM
  • by Joseph OConnor (37300) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:09AM (#1250975)
    Put this line in your preferences.js file:

    user_pref("browser.chrome.disableMyShopping", true);

  • Still no good fixes by Dysan2k (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:09AM
  • 4.72? No thanks... by MrHat (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:12AM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by blackc (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:13AM
  • Re:Question (Score:5)

    by zilym (3470) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:13AM (#1250979) Homepage
    I just don't use Netscape for downloading files now. What I do is right click the download link, copy link to clipboard, open an xterm, and then use wget to download the file. That way, if netscape crashes (like it always does), the download is unharmed. Plus, wget is smarter than netscape. If the server isn't letting anyone in at the moment, wget keeps trying. If the connection gets dropped, wget keeps trying and will resume where it left off as soon as it can get reconnected.
  • Re:too little, too late by grarg (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:14AM
  • by Gerv (15179) <`gerv' `at' `gerv.net'> on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:14AM (#1250981) Homepage
    Is this what you want?

    Some Reasons To Try Out A Nightly Build [mozillazine.org]

    Gerv
  • Re:gifs by north.coaster (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:15AM
  • by eriks (31863) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:17AM (#1250984) Homepage
    Looks to me like Navigator (The only useful part of Communicator IMO) is still 4.08... which has been out for months... Unless they actually modified it and didn't change the version number.
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by sterwill (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:19AM
  • What's New? Who knows? by GeekLife.com (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:19AM
  • by Junta (36770) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:20AM (#1250987)
    There are plenty of criticisms that are valid against netscape, and the shop button seems silly to me too, but your criticisms are a bit unjust. If your resolution makes things unreadable, why use it? it seems counterproductive.

    Be gald that the buttons can be disbaled. Since no one has posted how in this thread, here it is, straight from my .Xdefaults:
    Netscape*toolBar.myshopping.isEnabled: false

    That's it.
    To disable the search/my netscape, and add a Find button:
    Netscape*toolBar.destinations.isEnabled: false
    Netscape*toolBar.numUserCommands: 1
    Netscape*toolBar.userCommand1.commandName: findInObject
    Netscape*toolBar.userCommand1.labelString: Find
    Netscape*toolBar.userCommand1.commandIcon: Find
    Netscape*toolBar.search.isEnabled: false

  • AOL Takeover (Score:4)

    by Tassach (137772) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:21AM (#1250988) Homepage
    The quality of Navigator/Communicator seemed to be going downhill long before AOL took over Netscape; the fact that 95%+ of the original Netscape programming staff left after the takeover isn't going to help any. Given the quality (or lack thereof) of AOL's software, I shudder to think about the future of Navigator. I really don't want to have to switch to M$ Internet Exploiter, nor would I want to see a Navigator dumbed down to the level of the AOL client.

    Communicator 4.7 is pretty stable for me under NT, but I have pretty robust hardware (Athalon 550/128MB); it seems much less stable under Red Hat on my K6-II/400. My main gripe is it's speed; it seems to take forever to render a page, even on my Athalon. My other major gripe is that the email and news facilities are annoyingly primitive for such an otherwise mature program. (Plus, PGPFreeware dosn't have a Netscape plugin)

    I havn't had a chance to play with Mozilla yet; but I'm looking forward to seeing the final release. Hopefully Mozilla will fix a lot of the annoyances of 4.x

    "The axiom 'An honest man has nothing to fear from the police'
  • Re:gifs by grarg (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:25AM
  • ohh.. Howto, are you a crack baby? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:25AM
  • Navigator beyond 4.0x by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:28AM
  • Re:HOWTO by Gleef (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:28AM
  • by mosch (204) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:28AM (#1250994) Homepage
    The Linux NS is much more stable than the FreeBSD NS (scary, eh?). I'm posting this from Linux NS running on FreeBSD 3.4, a common enough option that there's actually a port for linux netscape in the freebsd ports collection.
    ----------------------------
  • Thought it was me. by mong (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:31AM
  • by GeekLife.com (84577) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:32AM (#1250996) Homepage
    I headed over to Google and searched for "Netscape Navigator 4.72" [google.com]... Check out who comes up 1st (and 2nd, and 3rd, and 6th) with Netscape.com nowhere to be seen.
  • Fixed the JS/CSS bug? by barzok (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:32AM
  • by MindStalker (22827) <jlarsen.fsu@edu> on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:33AM (#1250998) Journal
    Mozilla has had socks support for a while now, you can setup proxies manually by editing the prefs50.js file. Also in the new nightly builds I believe its possible to configure proxies in the mneus. Well m14 should be out any day now, so you can wait untill then if you want.
  • Re:Cherchez la moolah by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:34AM
  • Re:RPMs? by cmg (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:MEEPT!!!!! by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:Question by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by drwiii (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:41AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by cperciva (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:41AM
  • Strong Encryption? by Zefram (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:44AM
  • Re:Question by GoofyBoy (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:51AM
  • Re:Navigator beyond 4.0x by rcw-work (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:52AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by mong (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:54AM
  • Re:Fixed the JS/CSS bug? by hanche (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:54AM
  • Platform support (Score:5)

    by The Man (684) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:56AM (#1251012) Homepage
    Netscape/AOL's choice of platforms to support makes no sense to me. Figure this: Linux 2.2 is the current version; most people have stopped using 2.0 by now. Libc5 hasn't been supported by its authors in almost three years. So why is it that the Linux 2.2/glibc version is a) still unsupported, and b) linked against not-even-current versions of those libraries, especially when they still support 2.0/libc5???

    As if that weren't sufficiently annoying, there's not been a Linux/SPARC version since 4.51, but there are five Solaris versions. Of course, none of those are for current versions of Solaris either. All this, of course, would be excusable if they didn't have any systems to build on or they weren't going to support oddball platforms (I will admit that Linux/SPARC is marginal, though it has multiple supported distributions and a growing user base), but then why oh why are there two SINIX builds??? Most people don't even know WTF SINIX _is_, much less have it.

    The point? It doesn't seem like Netscape understands what people are actually using today. If the objective is to be compatible with as much as possible, then not having up-to-date Linux builds for at least Intel, SPARC, and Alpha makes no sense. For that matter, they don't even claim to support Solaris 7 or 8. 2.5.1 is itself archaic. If the objective is instead to support only the most popular platforms, then I certainly don't see the need for five Solaris builds, two AIX builds, anything related to SINIX, or a Linux 2.0/libc5 build. The obvious platforms to support would be Solaris 7, Linux 2.2-intel/glibc, the latest AIX, the latest Digital Unix, and IRIX 6.5.

    So what can we do to increase their awareness of this problem? Numerous polite letters have garnered either no response or a polite "get lost" form letter. Ideas?

    Alternate paranoid theory: AOL wants all the Unix builds to be against old systems so that people will switch to windoze and buy more aol service. Pretty paranoid, but aol is pure evil after all.

    PS: Kudos to the mozilla team for recognizing the value of compatibility and multi-platform support. The Linux/SPARC build works as well as any other.

    --TM, still using 4.51 on Ultralinux, the preferred platform of all major deities

  • Re:Navigator is still 4.08!??? by snubber1 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:00AM
  • Re:gifs by homer_ca (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:01AM
  • Netscape optimized RPMS by johnnyb (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:02AM
  • Netscape's Great (Score:3)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:02AM (#1251017)

    Well I think Netscape's great- twice the performance and a lot more stable than anything else made by other people who haven't paid me as much cash to say that.

    Barry Fishcake
    Senior VP, Mindcraft [rinkworks.com]

  • Re:most stable? by DGolden (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:03AM
  • by FascDot Killed My Pr (24021) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:03AM (#1251019)
    I've been using M13 as my ONLY browser (at work) for two weeks. I use it pretty heavily, and I go to Deja approx once per day.

    I have not had one single crash of the browser. (I have had mail crash on me).

    I was anxiously waiting for M14 to clean up some interface/formatting/speed problems, but apparently they aren't going to do one(?)
    --
    Here is the result of your Slashdot Purity Test.
  • by ixx (11362) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:04AM (#1251020) Homepage Journal
    better yet use a hex editor or something such thing (i like bvi since it uses vi commands) and change the the "Shop" string to "/." and the url to slashdot.org. The string "Shop" can be found by searching for "toolBar*Myshopping.labelString:" and the url netscape shopping url can be found my searching for "tshop.html" Be sure you just replace and do not enter more characters than are already there or you will the binary will be useless. Make a backup and work on a second copy.

    I make a xdelta patch so I can apply it on all the linux computers I use. The patch is specific to the build version though (do about: and you will see the version on the title bar). The newest one I have is for v4.7 build [en] 19990915. I have downloaded 4.72, but have not made a patch for it yet. I ran it and played around for a bit, and after seeing that it still displays the same annoying bugs as 4.7 I put off making a patch for now.

    Anyhow my navigation bar has the following:

    (forward)
    reload
    casa
    search (goes to goole. you can edit the url for this too)
    [fm] (freshmeat.net)
    print
    security
    /. (slashdot.org)
    halt
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:09AM (#1251021)
    I've been using netscape since it was version 1.x but finally this week, i got too pissed off at navigator for crashing, etc, i downloaded internet explorer 5.01 for win98 and it is just sooooo much faster and better than ns 4.7. almost nobody can deny it is a better product. the rendering speed alone is worth the price of download. i don't think i am ever going back unless i am using linux or on a school computer.

    if you have no other reason to use IE other than Microsoft hatred that's fine. But if you want to see what Mozilla will hopefully eventually being like, just download IE and see for yourself.

  • Re:AOL Takeover by AT (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:11AM
  • Re:HOWTO by IntlHarvester (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:14AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by mong (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:15AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by snubber1 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:16AM
  • Re:java plugin by Mazzella! (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:16AM
  • 4.72 seems better (Score:3)

    by Niomosy (1503) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:19AM (#1251030)
    After installing it I launched it... comes up much faster than 4.7 (on NT). Certainly faster than Mozilla or IE. Also, for those that haven't tried... copy your Netscape plugins directory contents into the Mozilla plugins directory. Quicktime works pretty well (it skips a little but wasn't that noticable on the X-Men preview). Flash is... "not entirely stable" (to steal from C3PO). Works on some sites and doesn't work on others (shockwave.com of all things)
  • Re:most stable? by DGolden (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:19AM
  • Re:Cherchez la moolah by rbf (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:19AM
  • Re:Netscape rarely crashes... by JohnnyCannuk (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:20AM
  • Re:HOWTO (Score:3)

    by StaticLimit (26017) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:22AM (#1251035) Homepage
    2) Turn off Cascading Style Sheets (Style Sheets) support in your preferences. It generally doesn't work well at all and really isn't all that necessary. And IME it makes NS crash. A lot.

    3) Turn off Java. Turn off Java. Turn off Java.

    4) Turn off Javascript if you don't use somewhat sophisticated sites.

    5) Don't invoke mystery components like Messenger and Composer and all that crap unless you actually need to use them. They tend to suck a bit.

    6) Feed it lots and lots and lots of disk/memory cache, or none at all.

    My god man! What's the point? You've turned off everything that makes it worthwhile to install a 4.x generation browser in the first place, haven't you?

    If none of the new features work... the solution is: Stick with the old version.

    - StaticLimit
  • Wget... by Ka0s (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:23AM
  • I switched... by Cyclope (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:24AM
  • what the heck for? by Jose (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:25AM
  • Re:Netscape's Great by drinkypoo (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:27AM
  • New feature? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:28AM
  • Does 4.72 fix the serious Composer bugs? by Johann (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:30AM
  • Hmmm... Netscape 128 bit link broken by Zen (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:31AM
  • Removing the Evils by Zule_Boy (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:32AM
  • So-called "Smart Update" by jlv (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:33AM
  • by irix (22687) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:33AM (#1251046) Journal
    What do you want ot bet that MS has hundreds of GeoCities pages with the words "click here to download Netscape" and a link to the Microsoft homepage :)
  • Re:Strong Encryption? by trupoet (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:35AM
  • Re:Netscape optimized RPMS by Schifter (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:36AM
  • by Traal (147061) <traal@eLIONtek.chalmers.se minus cat> on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:39AM (#1251050)
    Why disable it? Change it to something cool instead! Add to your ~/.Xdefaults

    ! Replace "Shop" with something useful:
    Netscape*strings.22495:http://slashdot.org
    Netscape*myshopping.labelString:/.
    Netscape*myshopping.documentationString:Go to Slashdot
    Netscape*myshopping.tipString:Slashdot
  • Re:Thought it was me. by wherley (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:40AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by look (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:41AM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by fsck (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:41AM
  • Re:what the heck for? by NCFlipper (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:43AM
  • Agreed.... by k00lg00z (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:44AM
  • by Rayban (13436) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:44AM (#1251056) Homepage
    If you want to see what's changed, check out the Release Notes [netscape.com]! Looks like a lot of changes, few fixes.
  • Re: Overextended Hack Job Piece of Crap by bluebomber (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:46AM
  • Re:Release notes by fsck (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:46AM
  • Re:Haven't... by captredballs (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:49AM
  • Re:Navigator is still 4.08!??? by Fiore2 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:49AM
  • Re:HOWTO by grrzes (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:51AM
  • Re:Hmmm... Netscape 128 bit link broken by fsck (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:54AM
  • Re:Release notes by habig (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:58AM
  • Do we vote with more than our mouths? by Isao (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:03AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by norom (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:03AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by Matt (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:04AM
  • What is SINIX? by cpeterso (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:08AM
  • Re:HOWTO by Frac (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:08AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by Accipiter (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:11AM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by Frac (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:11AM
  • Re:HOWTO by seanb (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:11AM
  • Go here (Score:3)

    by MatriXOracle (33400) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:13AM (#1251078) Homepage
    You can download Navigator standalone 4.72 for *nix here [netscape.com]. I don't think there's a Windows Navigator 4.72 though, that's probably still at 4.08. Oh well.
  • Re: no other reason to use IE other than MS hatred by CodeShark (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:18AM
  • Re: what's an Athalon? by CodeShark (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:20AM
  • Re:HOWTO by The Man (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:22AM
  • by hawk (1151) <hawk@eyry.org> on Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:23AM (#1251083) Journal
    I'm certain that there are valid uses for javascript out there. So far, though, the only uses I have seen are
    a) popu-up advertising
    b) taking control of the display away from the user in general
    c) creating links where a real link would have done at least as well
    d) forcing of automatic forwarding to an advertising site
    e) a single case where it was used to enable nested choices--choose the textbook then the chapter.

    Only e) even vaguely benefits the user, and this is arguable. a-d all either affirmatively harm the user, or are crummy programming.

    If your page requires javascript to function, unless you're doing something rather exotic with user data, it's almost certainly wrong. More than that, I'll go to one of your competitors--I used to use foxnews, but they're not enough better than CNN to put up with this.

    hawk
  • Look at it this way by MatriXOracle (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:23AM
  • Quite a number of people have ants in their pants by Sri Lumpa (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:25AM
  • by Foogle (35117) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:33AM (#1251087) Homepage
    Why is it that everyone that Mozilla works fine for thinks that everyone that Mozilla does not work fine for must be suffering from delusions. Mozilla may in fact work fine for you. It doesn't work fine for me though. It crashes ALL the time for me. It crashes all the time for a lot of people, actually.

    And based on the undisputable truth that Mozilla does crash consistently on some systems, I would have to say that no, Mozilla is not almost ready for primetime. They clearly have way too many bugs that have yet to be tracked down.

    Having said that, I would like to point out that I am not saying that Mozilla should be ready for regular use. I understand that it is an Alpha, and I wholeheartedly expect it to get much much better as it moves on. But you can't have it both ways.

    -----------

    "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by NickHolland (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:35AM
  • M13 works for me by SilentReproach (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:36AM
  • You can get Navigator >4.08 at least for Linux by Steelehead (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:37AM
  • Re: Overextended Hack Job Piece of Crap by tjwhaynes (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:37AM
  • Re:Platform support by The Man (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:40AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by whoop (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:41AM
  • Re:HOWTO by kip3f (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:44AM
  • Re:Huh? by p.oshea (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:46AM
  • Netscape 4.72 and Mozilla by Listen Up (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:49AM
  • Re:RPMs? by thue (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:50AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by Refrag (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:52AM
  • Re:gifs by Dman33 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:52AM
  • Re:HOWTO by Ded Bob (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:53AM
  • No Reboot Solution for NT by bughunter (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:54AM
  • Nothing new. by drag-po (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:59AM
  • Re:Do we vote with more than our mouths? by Zelphyr (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:59AM
  • Re:Platform support by Ded Bob (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:03AM
  • Re:Netscape optimized RPMS by johnnyb (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:04AM
  • Re:Haven't... by Camel Pilot (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:04AM
  • Re:M13 works for me by gargle (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:04AM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by BRSQUIRRL (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:06AM
  • by sammy baby (14909) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:06AM (#1251117) Journal
    Hey. That's pretty funny. :)

    Just a guess: the Google guys claim that what sets their search engine apart from so many others is that it weights sites based on other sites that link to it - if your site gets linked from one that sells widgets, a search for widgets is more likely to pull your site.

    Now, think of how many pr0n sites make you click one of those "I understand and agree with the terms of service" links. Almost invariably, the "I don't agree - I'm under 18" link takes you to Disney's page.

    So, searches for some "adult" key phrases bring up Disney, by sheer force of association. (Dear god. I can't imagine what would happen if their lawyers got wind of this.)

  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by MrEfficient (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:08AM
  • Most stable Netscape on Debian/unstable by Adnans (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:10AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by gargle (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:11AM
  • Re: Overextended Hack Job Piece of Crap by Quintin Stone (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:13AM
  • Re:I'm smoking M13--and it tastes great! by SEAL (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:16AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? Neither. by Chagrin (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:19AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by romco (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:20AM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by davie (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:24AM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by tigerand (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:28AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by orabidoo (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:28AM
  • Re:The CHANGELOG (release notes) by cmpute (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:33AM
  • Re:javascript sophisticated??? by powerlord (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:33AM
  • cnn.com also works for me by FascDot Killed My Pr (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:34AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by DennisZeMenace (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:38AM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by bilenkey (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:39AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by gargle (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:43AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by pli (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:50AM
  • Re:HOWTO by Elbereth (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:52AM
  • On Hacking the prefs.js file by Kozz (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:55AM
  • Re:Prior comment is what's wrong with Linux today by sterwill (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:59AM
  • That's not "insightful", it's incorrect by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:59AM
  • Re:Platform support by powerlord (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:00AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? Neither. by GeekLife.com (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:03AM
  • Re:Question by maniack (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:05AM
  • Arggggggg!$@#!$#$! by vicviper (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:07AM
  • Netscape is dying... If not dead already... by Ektanoor (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:08AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by norom (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:10AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by whatever3 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:15AM
  • Re:Navigator is still 4.08!??? by singularity (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:27AM
  • Netscape and Memory (was: Re:Removing the Evils) by Kymermosst (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:33AM
  • Re:HOWTO by subimage (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:47AM
  • Re:Navigator is still 4.08!??? by Zan Thrax (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:48AM
  • It does have uses - compression is one by Bjarke Roune (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:50AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by Zan Thrax (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:51AM
  • Mozilla is NS6? by cpeterso (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:51AM
  • Re:What is SINIX? by lqd (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:52AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by Zan Thrax (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:53AM
  • Re:Platform support by The Man (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:54AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by exekewtable (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:58AM
  • Re:Question by ShelbyCobra (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:59AM
  • Re:Haven't... by MikeBabcock (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:01PM
  • Re: Overextended Hack Job Piece of Crap by datazone (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:01PM
  • Re:Haven't... by puetzk (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:22PM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by gargle (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:26PM
  • Re:Netscape is dying... If not dead already... by Kilzall (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:26PM
  • by Sethb (9355) <bokelman@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:32PM (#1251185) Homepage
    Run Win2K, best of both worlds. I'm running it on my home machine, played Unreal Tournament and Age of Empires II: Age of Kings for several hours last night without so much as a hiccup. Most games run on Windows 2000, at least most good ones :) I wanted to slap the local Software Etc. punk when he told me that they weren't supposed to sell Windows 2000 to anyone other than small-business customers "Because you can't play any games on it" I told him I had the beta version, and it had worked just fine for my games for the last 6 months. He told me he had it, and not only couldn't he play games, it didn't work with his cable modem either. I promptly decided he was a retard and left. Useful link: http://ntgamepalace.3dfiles.com/ [3dfiles.com] That site will tell you which games and hardware have been found to work with Windows 2000. Of course, it says that my HP Digital Camera C200 works with Windows 2000, and I can't get it to, so your mileage may vary.
    ---
  • IE better? by cout (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:38PM
  • Re:HOWTO by poink (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:39PM
  • Re:You're a dumbass. by snubber1 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:39PM
  • Re:Platform support by guacamole (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:41PM
  • Re:Still no good fixes by puetzk (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:42PM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by My_Favorite_Anonymou (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:51PM
  • Re:Haven't... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @12:59PM
  • by kevlar (13509) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:01PM (#1251193)
    Wow! That amazes me! I'm wondering how you're actually using the program! I had it crash 4 times in under an hour just surfing sites, so I stopped using it. I have respect for the Mozilla team, but they've got a long way to go from what I've seen by using the browser. I dunno, maybe they're all trivial fixes.
  • Re:My last post and moderation by Shadowcaster (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:08PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by philtH_ (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:09PM
  • Crashing on Password Dialogs under Linux by Omegaman (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:13PM
  • [OT] With All Due Respect by MikeV (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:18PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by bcilfone (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:26PM
  • Re:I'm smoking M13--and it tastes great! by matsh (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:27PM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by cxd204 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:29PM
  • Re:I'm smoking M13--and it tastes great! by Romen (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:40PM
  • by CentrX (50629) on Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:50PM (#1251205)
    They just don't seem to care. There are too many unfixed bugs in Netscape, some of which are actually new, introduced in 4.72 A few highlights from the Linux/Unix section at http://hom e.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/4.7/relnotes/windows-4. 72.html#unix [netscape.com]

    "Using the Insert Link command (or the Link button) in Composer or when composing HTML messages may cause Communicator to crash." This is a brand-spanking new bug in Netscape 4.72 Why don't they fix this stuff before they release it? Or, barring that, at least take out the feature so people don't crash Netscape by using it.

    "If you attempt to use Messenger the very first time you run Communicator, it may quit with an "Illegal instruction" message."

    "If you delete your only IMAP server and then add a POP server, Communicator may quit."

    "A previous workaround for Unix systems, to avoid the freezing on startup of the edit or compose window, has been changed." Is it just me, or does this just sound silly? Changing workarounds, why don't they just fix it!?

    I wouldn't mind this so much, except they're introducing new features, mostly useless features, before they even bother to fix these bugs.

    Chris Hagar

  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by SPK (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @01:55PM
  • Re:Do we vote with more than our mouths? by thebruce (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:00PM
  • heh by CrAlt (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:02PM
  • Re:Strong Encryption? Here! by rickmoen (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:04PM
  • Thats why god made /tmp by CrAlt (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:07PM
  • Japanese Input by Kanasta (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:11PM
  • NS hit or miss? by CrAlt (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:17PM
  • Re:New feature? by BrookHarty (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:24PM
  • Re:Mozilla is NS6? by spathi (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:24PM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by CrAlt (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:26PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by Dave Walker (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:30PM
  • I might be wrong...but by CrAlt (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:31PM
  • Re:Haven't... by lunatik17 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:37PM
  • Netscape and Infoworld by Dave Walker (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:42PM
  • Re:Navigator is still 4.08!??? by Cameroon (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @02:56PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:03PM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by IkeTo (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:05PM
  • Agreed. My tips are: by Wench (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:13PM
  • don't forget fortify! by toppk (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:27PM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by Mondo54 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:45PM
  • Cannot convert string "false" to type Boolean by Wench (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:49PM
  • dammit! by Mondo54 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:50PM
  • Re:Japanese Input by brusk (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @03:59PM
  • Re:*That's* good??? by swingerman (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @04:27PM
  • Re:Japanese Input by RottenApple (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @04:37PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @04:39PM
  • You can do most of this via prefs.js, but... by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @04:54PM
  • Re:You can do most of this via prefs.js, but... by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @04:57PM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by TummyX (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:00PM
  • Re:doh! by Coniagas (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:00PM
  • Re:ohh.. Howto, are you a crack baby? by PerlGeek (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:02PM
  • Re: There's a W2K games patch too by TummyX (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:03PM
  • Re:Haven't... by lunatik17 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:03PM
  • Re:You're a dumbass. by TummyX (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:07PM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by anim8 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:15PM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? BUT by rjamestaylor (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:26PM
  • Re:Coincidence/Conspiracy? Neither. LUSER by anim8 (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:27PM
  • Re:You can do most of this via prefs.js, but... by bicho (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:36PM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by norkakn (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:38PM
  • Re:Haven't... by SMT (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:43PM
  • Re:HOWTO by vanyel (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @05:46PM
  • google search for MS-IE yields Netcenter by legoman (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:06PM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by RottenApple (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:16PM
  • Re:AOL Takeover by caferace (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:23PM
  • Re:Hmmm... Netscape 128 bit link broken by caferace (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:33PM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by TummyX (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @06:36PM
  • Re:It does have uses - compression is one by jacobito (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:36PM
  • Nonsense :) by / (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:43PM
  • You forgot "FILTERS FILTERS FILTERS" by / (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @07:54PM
  • Annoying bug still not fixed by supz (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @08:58PM
  • M13 Works Great?! Tell me your secret! by Epitaph (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @09:00PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by bcilfone (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @10:50PM
  • How to disable Shop button and My Netscape by bcilfone (Score:1) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:20PM
  • Re:Do we vote with more than our mouths? by slim (Score:2) Wednesday February 23 2000, @11:30PM
  • Re:too little, too late by Helge Hafting (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @12:00AM
  • Re:RTFM by fR0993R-on-Atari-520 (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @12:28AM
  • 2.0 vs 2.2 (Was:Platform support) by Mop (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @12:39AM
  • Re:cnn.com also works for me by Foogle (Score:2) Thursday February 24 2000, @12:49AM
  • Re:Platform support by Alex (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @01:48AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by RottenApple (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @02:21AM
  • Re:What is SINIX? by flawed (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @02:25AM
  • Re:Thought it was me. by LukeyBoy (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @02:44AM
  • Re:Mozilla?? What are you smoking? by GregWebb (Score:2) Thursday February 24 2000, @02:54AM
  • I've been buying it for the last 3 versions by gruntvald (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @03:24AM
  • Get nightly builds is a little more stable by Sleepy (Score:2) Thursday February 24 2000, @04:21AM
  • Re:doh! by theMAGE (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @04:22AM
  • Re:Coincidence or Conspiracy? by Bastiaan (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @05:15AM
  • I've fscking had it with Netscape. by phee (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @06:57AM
  • Re:How to disable Shop button and My Netscape by -Walrus- (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @08:46AM
  • Re:Use IE if you run Windows by TummyX (Score:2) Thursday February 24 2000, @08:47AM
  • Apple contributions to Mozilla by Colin Simmonds (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @08:53AM
  • Re:Mozilla is NS6? by powerlord (Score:2) Thursday February 24 2000, @11:18AM
  • Re:4.72? No thanks... by joepeg (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @04:48PM
  • Re:Platform support by pb (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @05:02PM
  • It was an XFree86 bug! by alecf (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @07:11PM
  • Re: Overextended Hack Job Piece of Crap by medcalf (Score:1) Thursday February 24 2000, @07:48PM
  • Re:Do we vote with more than our mouths? by thebruce (Score:1) Friday February 25 2000, @04:46AM
  • Re:You can do most of this via prefs.js, but... by ixx (Score:1) Saturday February 26 2000, @12:35PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by ixx (Score:1) Saturday February 26 2000, @12:40PM
  • Re:How to disable Shop button and My Netscape by ixx (Score:1) Saturday February 26 2000, @12:42PM
  • Re:How to disable Shop button and My Netscape by ixx (Score:1) Saturday February 26 2000, @12:46PM
  • Re:Disabling shopping button.. by m3000 (Score:1) Tuesday February 29 2000, @01:47PM
  • Why even use the navigation bar? by au3 (Score:1) Tuesday February 29 2000, @04:58PM
  • Re:Why even use the navigation bar? by ixx (Score:1) Tuesday February 29 2000, @08:28PM
  • A few modifications to your javascript... by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday March 01 2000, @06:08AM
  • made a slashdot thread for netscape mod discussion by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday March 01 2000, @06:25AM
  • Rblah... make that link article.pl?sid=netscape by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday March 01 2000, @06:26AM
  • correct link by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday March 01 2000, @06:50AM
  • The REAL correct link :) by ixx (Score:1) Wednesday March 01 2000, @06:53AM
  • Thanx for proving my point by SpiceWare (Score:1) Thursday March 02 2000, @09:15AM
  • 78 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4