We should have the tools. I'm not arguing that we should go back to agrarian lifestyles. But somehow we as a society should find a way to not permit wanton waste of resources in the name of cheap, fleeting entertainment.

The issue is that those videos are being created en masse. People would simply not create them in the first place. Making resources so easily available that people waste them without thinking is the reason capitalism has turned our society into a planet destroying machine and called it "quality of life". Nobody's quality of life is improved by the existence of videos of fake cats doing improbable things, yet we've now invested a civilization worth of resources into creating them. It's the broken window fallacy, writ so large that it's unrecognizable.

Problem is people aren't just querying. They're saying "generate a video of a cat riding a shark", which uses a LOT of inference and compute.

But then you would not have learned the value of a 10 second Google search before asking a question with an extremely easy to find answer.

a) I don't believe you. You're lying and there's nothing you can say that will change my mind. I live in Australia where I probably drive to a weekend dinner a distance that you call a "road trip". The number of people here who have done 800+km in a day is vanishingly small. 800km is NOT 8 hours. It'll be around 10 at a minimum even if you're on highway the whole time. There's pee stops. There's traffic and animal slow downs. There's leg stretching and snacking. The fact that you think 800km can be done in 8 hours in any setting other than a controlled speed run tells me that you've probably never driven long distance, ever.

b) If you drive 8 hours with your wife in the car without taking any rest stops, then you are both irresponsible adults. Which tracks with the rest of what you say here.

c) Because making car decisions based on something you do once or twice in your lifetime is stupid. Which tracks with the rest of what you're saying here.

d) Can't afford it? Then go on vacation closer. Driving 2% of the Earth's equatorial circumference because you want a vacay is not a fundamental right you spoiled brat. Get your highly educated kids to chip in for a better vehicle, seeing as you raised them so well.

I hurl insults because I feel it's completely justified. And given the string of factual inaccuracies throughout your post, I doubt you specifically raised kids to go into research fields to help the environment. If you had anywhere NEAR that level of prescience and foresight, you would not think along the lines of "I've earned the right to pollute for no good reason".

a) 800km in a day is beyond being a rare edge case. The % of the population that has ever done, or will ever do, 800km in a single day would be below 1%.
b) In 800km of driving, you will take more than 45 minutes worth of breaks anyway. You just need to use your brain a little and plan it to stop at a charging station. Although, if you're American, I do understand that brain use is quite the ask.
c) There are now EVs capable of going 800km in a single charge, if you truly are doing 800km in a day with any degree of regularity (which I highly doubt)
d) Even if you do wait a bit more, that small price is worth it for a planet we can live on, you childish, stupid, self-centered, short sighted sack of dumb horseshit.

EVs are now a direct replacement for ALL consumer use cases. If you need to tow your shitty trailer home from London to Prague twice a week then bad luck. Charging stations are common enough now.

Defend whatever you want, buddy. The reality is they're literally making it up. The *only* thing they've got is an anonymous source. The documents are completely specious- they contain no alterations to federal contractor requirements whatsoever. Yes, they reference the Justice40 bogeyman, but that, too, make no changes to federal contractor requirements. So pardon me for using the word "biased" when "liars" would have been more fitting.

From an obviously-biased source, yes. Not one reporting the reality of actual federal policy. Ooh, "one senior official!" And "internal memos!" Couldn't possibly be made up, not with their utter failure (and yours) to cite a single public document outlining any policy change whatsoever from the prior half century.

How would the article be any more falsifiable if they had blamed leprechauns? Do you think it might have been leprechauns?

We now have a NUMBER for the value of these data breaches. Time for the Lawyers to use this metric to go after every single data breach.

Were there? How odd that I've mentioned three of them explicitly and you're at zero, even after being called out for your ignorance of *any* of them.

How 'bout if I buy now and pay after I die?

Sure, so ignore what the administration actually did, then. Perhaps the citation of 5 numbers and 3 letters was too difficult for you. Wouldn't surprise me, you really are a dumbass.

To think, it would take one, just *one* citation to any federal official document whatsoever and you could look like less of a dipshit.

To be perfectly honest, I lost track of who I was replying to and who the idiot was. I guess it's me for delivering snark without proper target identification. Apologies.

Latitude is not the only factor. Geography and topology also matter. Although, understanding that requires a high school level of science literacy and as the other guy pointed out, this is a US website after all.