whoever57 writes: A UK Premier League football match (Manchester United vs. Bournmouth) was called off, 76,000 people were evacuated from the stadium and a "controlled explosion" carried out because of a "suspicious device". What was the device? A fake bomb that had been left behind by a security exercise. The exercise involved an external company and sniffer dogs. This incident also raises the question of how the pre-game security sweep did not find the device.
whoever57 writes: In the UK, a celebrity couple were able to convince the Appeals Court to grant an injunction about the fact that the couple took part in a threesome. The injunction only covers England and Wales, so a Scottish newspaper named the couple. Obviously, the injunction doesn't extend outside the rest of the UK, so the couple have been named in US publications. The UK newspapers have take the issue to the UK's Supreme Court, where one judge made the incredible remark: "Hard copy newspapers in some respect may be regarded as causing less harm than the internet which is, subject to deletions, technically permanent." Someone needs to show this judge the Wayback Machine, and explain how deleting information off the Internet is not possible. They should also show the judge how history is preserved on Wikipedia.
whoever57 writes: In another overreaction by counter-terrorism officers, a truck with exposed wiring and a couple of gas cans caused a partial shut down of Times Square. The driver was hit with 10 summonses after he was identified. The offenses that the driver was charged with appear to be minor issues.
whoever57 writes: District Judge Quentin Purdy has ordered that Navinder Singh Sarao should be extradited to the USA. This is not the last step for Mr. Sarao, as the extradition must next be reviewed by the Home Secretary. Mr. Sarao is accused of causing the "Flash Crash" of 2010 in which the Dow Jones index dropped 600 points in minutes. He faces 22 criminal charges, for "spoofing" (entering and withdrawing orders to manipulate the market). As the submitter, it's not clear to me how this man did anything different from the high-speed and algorithmic traders do every day.
whoever57 writes: A California jury in one of the cases between Synopsys and Atoptech found copyright infringement in Atoptech's use of the "Primetime commands". These companies compete in the field of EDA ("Electronic Design Automation") software: software that is used by semiconductor companies to design ICs.
The Primetime commands are merely an interface. Atoptech has their own implementation of the functionality that these commands demand. This can be seen as similar to the Oracle Vs Google lawsuit, in which an appeals court has found that providing a similar interface (via header files) can constitute copyright infringement. Naturally, there will be appeals in this case.
whoever57 writes: Infoworld has a an article about a discussion at LWN.net which talks about the recent compromise of the Linux mint isos and how Mint is really a security nightmare and a hack. One poster refers to the fact that Linux mint names packaes such that the names collide with existing Debian packages, the fact that Mint pulls binary packages directly from Ubuntu repositories and the the Mint developers also include packages that may infringe on copyright (typically closed-source products that allow downloads, but not redistribution). There is some praise for the work that the Mint developers have done with Cinnamon and Mate, but no mention that Mint is one if the few distros that offers an option that does not use systemd.
whoever57 writes: Talia Jane was employed by Yelp in San Francisco. After posting in an open letter to Yelp's CEO, Jeremy Stoppelman, that her after-tax income of $8.15 was insufficient to provide basic necessities, like heating, food, etc. she discovered that she had been fired. How did she discover? Her work email stopped working. Even her boss did not know what had happened. Stoppelman denies having a hand in her firing, making the vague claim that “(There are) two sides to every HR story...". I guess, he didn't personally turn off her email, perhaps he did not even take the decision to fire her, but, as the person who ultimately sets the culture and policies of the company, his claim to not be directly responsible is unconvincing.
whoever57 writes: A former employee of Yahoo is challenging Yahoo's performance review and termination process. The ranking system was introduced to by Ms. Mayer on the recommendation of management consultants McKinsey & Co.. Gregory Anderson, an editor who oversaw Yahoo’s autos, homes, shopping, small business and travel sites in Sunnyvale, Calif. is claiming that the ranking and termination process was flawed to the extent that the terminations were not based on performance and hence constitute mass layoffs, which require notice periods under both California and Federal law. He is also alleging gender discrimination, under which women were given preferential treatment over men in the hiring, promotions and layoff processes.
whoever57 writes: Google UK has come to an agreement with HMRC (Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) under which it will recognize a larger share of its UK sales in the UK, instead of funnelling them through the Republic of Ireland. In addition, Google will pay 130M UK Pounds in back taxes representing tax on sales since 2005.
whoever57 writes: The UK government now plans to ban companies from using encryption that cannot be decrypted on demand. There does not appear to be any consideration of whether others, perhaps with malicious intent will be able to leverage the same weaknesses in encryption, or perhaps the UK government believes that the impossible can be achieved just because they can pass a law? The UK government apparently hopes that people are not aware of Snowdon and the revelations that came out of "Loveint", stating: “I think it is absurd to suggest the police and the security services have a kind of casual desire to intrude on the privacy of the innocent...They have enough difficulty finding the guilty. No-one has produced any evidence of casual curiosity on part of the security services."