Comment Re:Raises questions for sure (Score 1) 74
Comment Re:Smdh (Score 1) 17
The straightforward solution is for the UPS manufacturers to jitter the test time and it becomes a total non-issue.
From TFA:
Fortunately, the solution may be relatively straightforward, at least for big batteries and backup systems. Rather than having thousands of devices perform the same task at the same moment, manufacturers could introduce small variations into their software schedules, preventing the minutely pile-up.
Indeed, they have already contacted the manufacturer of one of the systems they identified, and the company issued a software update that relaxed the strict periodicity of its system checks.
Comment Logitech gives its employees that day off! VLDL... (Score 1) 55
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=logi...
Also, Viva La Dirt League made a few funny skit videos on GTA (check out their other ones too): https://www.youtube.com/@VivaL...
Comment Re:The AI agent is too useful (Score 2) 40
But they have put up another term and condition to protect themselves from errant customers. If the AI makes a mistake but the customer is adamant that they're in the right, the airline now has a specific clause to refuse them.
Comment Obi-Wan... (Score 1) 225
For me, I felt like old Ob-Wan: https://www.youtube.com/shorts...
Comment Re:Renewables are the way to go (Score 1) 225
What has any of your tiresome arguing with me got to do with the point I was making about the purpose of China's fleet of new coal plants? All you've done so far is get fixated on the fact that I said "peakers" instead of the more precise "load following and also some peakers".
Grids that are modern compared to the world average and use a lot of coal include China, the US, India, Germany, Japan and South Korea. All of them still predominantly use their coal for baseload, although all of them are transitioning to using it for flexibility as well. China and the US are the only ones to use some coal for true peaking, ie shutting off for several hours and then re-starting within 24 hours. Some of the US fleet has a capacity factor under 20% because it's being used in this way. Obviously this is not a role well-suited to coal. But it's still being done.
I have no idea why you fixated the way you did. Especially when your subsequent blanket statements were at least as inaccurate as my opening one.
Comment Um, Gulf of what PBS? (Score 2) 27
Okaloosa County in Florida eventually stepped in to purchase the ship and bring it to the Gulf of Mexico
Good for you, now let's re-check your federal funding and access to the White House Press Pool
Comment how much money did the investors make from this? (Score 1) 4
Why are the investors complaining?
Comment Re:Capsized? (Score 0) 27
Comment Re:Capsized? (Score 4, Insightful) 27
You know artificial reefs are supposed to be places where ocean wildlife are supposed inhabit and thrive, right? To prepare a ship for this is a ton of work because they have to clean the ship of all the stuff that would poison wildlife.
And explosives leave lots of residual chemicals that impact wildlife.
Anyhow, there's nothing wrong with settling on the side. Maybe if you're diving to see it's not pleasant, but I'm sure the fish and such don't really care.
Comment Re:Not really news (Score 0) 40
Right now, when an AI routinely commits federal crimes like hacking government web sites, nobody is held accountable.
Nobody held accountable is par for the course in this U.S. Administration. Hopefully both of those will change in about 2 years.
Comment Re:how can we possibly be back to this? (Score 2) 74
The executive branch will try pretty hard to bury this. They’ll probably succeed through distraction, same as always. Huang’s goose might be cooked, but he also might know enough about Trump’s under-the-table dealings that the admin might protect him. I dunno.
Comment Re:how can we possibly be back to this? (Score 1) 74
I'm thinking the chinese spy thing might also do so - that's a massive legal risk due to violation of export controls. Nvidia is on the hook for third party exports or "reexports", same as any other business who ships things that fall under export controls.
They got paid, and they were paid to not look too carefully. And the US Government takes a dim look on that and doesn't brook any bullshit excuses. Or, at least, they used to less than a year ago - Applied Materials got rung up for about a quarter billion in civil fines for reexport of semiconductor equipment in February. Corporate officers who are found to willingly violate can get up to 20 years in prison. The laws state that it can be fines of over $300k *per violation* and apparently Megaspeed was buying and reexporting billions worth of Nvidia products, but that doesn't go as far as it used to I guess (har har).
Comment Re:If true.... (Score 1) 74
If the board is happy with the CEO, they'll conveniently not-look-too-hard, or settle privately with any spurned lovers.