So you completely misunderstand how your "whataboutism" to a completely orthogonal topic (i.e. goalpost moving) is a bad faith argument, meant to distract from the question you don't want to answer.

And then you go on with the bad faith argument.

Nice try, but not everyone around here is as stupid as you, and can recognize your weak shit for what it is.

The sheer tonnage of irony of this cuck spewing right-wing dipshittery while accusing others of being "drowned in Media Propaganda" would stun a John Deere in it's tracks.

So will running it out of diesel fuel because the farmer is bankrupt from having his soybean market taken from him, his fuel input costs doubled, and the importation of 300 million tons of mystery meat that would never pass USDA inspection that he has to contend with; but what are ya gonna do?

What's jarring is if you go back and look at footage from the primary debates in 2016 just how far he's deteriorated. He used to at least tie together a few coherent sentences in a row. Now it's all sundowning gibberish.

The Republican Party should be indicted on elder abuse.

Nowhere except in the sweatiest of fever dreams, is anyone talking about "trans everywhere" and "compulsory" except you.

Why are you lying about what people's positions are? Can't argue against their actual positions, so you need to stand up a giant straw man to knock the hell out of?

Dipshit.

What is hilarious is that many polls show this to be an issue that only 2% of people care about as anything they would vote on. These people are chasing literal non-issues because they lose, and lose big on the issues that voters actually give a fuck about:
- war
- cost of living
- health care
- not being killed by out-of-control federal immigration agents with zero jurisdiction over citizens
- not being fleeced by corrupt swamp creatures that pledged to "drain the swamp"
- not being fucked over by stupendously moronic tariffs, levied by a guy who has no clue who actually pays the tariffs
- not being fucked over by an idiot who starts wars for conditions that only exist due to his complete ineptitude
- not wasting vast sums of money on ego stroking projects like billion dollar ballrooms and an arch nobody asked for
- not fucking over monuments that already exist with chemistry defying stupidity, blamed on (apparently) ninja vandals that can somehow carve 200-foot gashes in the bottom of a pool with nobody noticing, and no camera footage when there are cameras pointed at it 24/7

I could go on, but I don't think I need to.

Of course he uses it. How else could he churn out such slop as:
- him depicted as the Pope
- him depicted as Jesus Christ
- him depicted as some 5-star general with a shitload of ribbons on his chest after being a 5-time draft dodger
- him depicted as having a conversation with George Washington
- all his other racist, idiotic, moronic drivel

This is why he doesn't see any issue with AI: for all he knows, it's just for making stupid videos of him dumping literal shit on protesters - but remember, this is the guy who proclaimed he would bring free speech back while banning journalists for being mean to him in the press.

Thanks for proving that you have nothing but goalpost moving.

Trump is never going to see you being his water boy. He will never know your name, and doesn't care if you exist or not. Why would you constantly defend someone like that?

Why have you made his plain and obvious stupidity your identity's locus?

Oh, the nukes they never had? And swore to never pursue creating / obtaining in any way in the JCPOA that was thrown in the trash?

Who trashed that, by the way?

Who created the current environment for Iran to be enriching towards weapons grade, when they weren't before, as proven by IAEA inspectors that had access to see what they were doing under the JCPOA?

Who bombed Iran, and claimed "obliteration" of their nuclear program? Was that a lie? How can it be obliterated, and then have a functional nuclear explosive only 4 years from now?

Is Trump going to be upset that you don't believe his "obliteration" lie, and that's why you posted anonymous? Or did you post anonymous because you know you're a massive idiot and don't want to be flamed for it?

Also, it's an interesting path to cut where you are blaming Democrats for the hypothetical Iranian nuclear weapons "they could have done something to stop" when THEY LITERALLY DID STOP THEM, and you dumb motherfuckers voted in the guy that made it possible again. Then voted for him again. And are now carrying his water for a war nobody wanted, based on weapons-grade bullshit and lies that you suck down like Coca-Cola.

Please unplug from the Internet for a while, and go get professional help. You can't even reconcile your own bullshit with yourself.

I am absolutely sure that zero history books are going to mention anyone on this pathetic run-down version of a 1950s motel along Route 66 in a ghost town nobody remembers, nor cares about.

Please reacquaint yourself with easily observed reality, for all our sakes.

Past good doesn't excuse current shitty.

Save the "net good" bullshit for the eulogy. We care about what people do in the present.

[Citation needed]

Please quote one elected Democrat -- literally anywhere, at any level of government -- that has said they want Iran to have nuclear weapons.

Fucking clown.

They are all spineless simps that are too afraid of a single guy who they think still holds sway with voters, despite all the signal pointing to the opposite.

Well, too bad for some of them - they'll hear the signal LOUD AND CLEAR come November 3. Maybe the rest see a wake-up call when they become the minority again and are tasked with actually defending all this shit rather than being able to ignore it and hide behind not holding hearings, not actually questioning the actors under oath, and not actually conducting any meaningful oversight.

It's annual review time for these cucks, and the numbers aren't looking good for them. I hope they all get plenty of time to go write memoirs and do Fox News hits come January 3.

The Dem leadership can count to 67, and apparently you cannot.

If they thought they could get it done, they would do it. But they know the Senate math, so trying to impeach a third time is a huge waste of time and energy for no actual benefit.

What they are going to actually do, which can actually work: start impeaching at the cabinet level, starting with Whiskey Pete. The votes are probably there for that one - and definitely are there to haul his ass into oversight committees under oath to answer for his bullshit.

Let's get some accountability for these cucks and see how that goes. Build this thing like a RICO prosecution - you start with the lieutenants, roll them up on the captains, and then go after the bossman.

Probably not, because he was also an intelligent person who could weight multiple facets of information in order to vote for his own interests, unlike the majority of Trump voters who clearly voted against their own interests.

See: the repeated screwing of farmers over the last two years, who by-and-large voted Trump.