Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Conflicted (Score 1) 90

Their airfoil design was what got the aviation industry under way, no one else had worked out an actual functional design yet. Otto Lelienthal for example was killed when his glider stalled because of poor airfoil configuration. IIRC they also worked out the mechanics of a wind tunnel trying to figure out the correct shape.

Comment Re:Trump is RIGHT. Wake up, you Communists (Score 1) 147

China learned almost a thousand years ago that attempting to conquer and occupy foreign territory against the wishes of its populace was unsustainable, while trade links and mutual interests could last centuries. Unfortunately the US does not have the history to have learned that, nor the ability to learn from other cultures.

Comment Re:Trump is RIGHT. Wake up, you Communists (Score 1) 147

The Strait of Hormuz consists entirely of Iranian and Omani coastal waters, no international waters there. They have every bit as much right to decide what happens in the Strait of Hormuz as the US and Canada have to decide what happens in the Strait of Juan de Fuca that enters into Puget Sound.

Comment Re:Conflicted (Score 1) 90

Americans blatantly "steal" Chinese IP as well, that's how technology progresses. Or do you think that if China wants to build an airplane they should have to invent a whole new airfoil rather than "steal" from the Wright brothers? I personally have come to think that the whole idea of "imaginary property" is more of a drag on our civilization than a benefit. I used to be of the opposite opinion but the more I learned about the history of technology the less value protecting IP seemed to have for society as a whole.

Comment Re:If it's not US soil (Score 2) 218

But none of the US citizen "illegal combatants" (i.e. fighters who don't wear uniforms) were involved with attacks against the Untied States, so does it magically make it legal for a US president to order their death, in another country no less? No, it doesn't. And does it somehow also make it legal to kill everyone in their vicinity? No, it doesn't. And even if they HAD attacked the US, and were on US soil, does that give the president the right to have them killed without due process? No, it doesn't.

If neo-Nazis in Idaho attack an Army Reserve base to steal weapons can the President just order a Predator drone to fire into his car, possibly with his family in it? It doesn't? Why? They are, after all, "illegal combatants" who directly attacked the US.

These killings are murders, nothing less.

Comment Re:Download? (Score 1) 218

How does CBP know where the upload is? Is the uploaded file publicly accessible or would they need another password to even get their hands on it?

So he's not even back on US soil yet? Habeas corpus does not yet apply.

Defending the concept of a constitution-free tyranny zone for foreigners (where US border patrol somehow still has legal authority?) is fashy enough, but it's really freaking bad when you use it to strip an American citizen of the rights their own country affords them.

Comment Re:If it's not US soil (Score 2, Interesting) 218

Maybe not, but Presidiots since Shrub have decided they have the right to KILL you for your activities in other countries, US citizen or not, and will send a drone to fire a million dollar missile to take out you and everyone in your vicinity. No trial or even any evidence necessary.

Slashdot Top Deals

Try `stty 0' -- it works much better.

Working...