Why do you think it's bad that GH isn't a slave to jerks?

The bottom line is that this degenerate had no contract with either NPM or GH, so the literally owed him nothing. They could have stayed neutral, but they didn't have to.

Being a jerk has consequences, even if they are not legally-mandated consequences.

He has the mind and maturity of a child. He thinks that if he insincerely apologizes to his sister it will make everything better and he'll still get that new Nintendo game he was having a tantrum over.

Because he acted like a child. He got put in time-out. What kind of hell do you live in where bad actions have no consequences?

GH does not owe anyone but paying customers an account. He gave away something for free and got pissed when people took his offer at face-value. Well, GH gave him something for free and then temporarily took it away when he proved to be a child.

People who wear safety equipment sometimes die despite their precautions. It would be illogical to mock them for doing someone sensible and rational, just because it didn't work due to some unforeseen circumstance.

Not only do these anti-vax advocates not take precautions for themselves, they also attempt to convince other people to be equally negligent. THAT deserves mocking, at a minimum. Really they should be vilified and only remembered for the evil they committed.

One of my oldest friend's mother was an anti-vaxxer. She died to COVID-19. The harm these people do is real. Someone out there convinced my friend's mother to commit suicide.

Just because something is a personal choice doesn't mean a person makes a good choice. When people advocate TO OTHERS that they make bad choices, mocking them is the LEAST we can do in retaliation. They really deserved to have been tortured to death, but at least karma got them for us.

I was using desktops as a kid before the Web was invented.

Does it need to be justified?

The question of justification is moot, as it begs the question: does it need to be justified in the first place?

It's still censorship when a private person or organization does it. What it isn't is illegal or immoral.

There was nothing a rational person could even imagine as being an insurrection after the 2016 election. You are clearly an irrational shit stain.

I suspect there's a large overlap between "conservatives" and people who say dumb shit in order to hurt other people. Whether it's convincing them that vaccines are bad or that insurrection is necessary to prevent a "fraudulent" election from being certified. Or that trans people are evil non-humans who are trying to take over society and scare little girls in public restrooms.

It's sabotage because he intentionally broke the code. That act fits every rational definition of the term. You need to have your head bashed in with a two-by-four until you get some morals.

There's a big difference between the ball going missing the ball being swapped for a hand grenade mid-play.